techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Software > General Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 9, 2007, 07:46 PM   #1
Sasqui
Eligible for custom title
 
Sasqui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,041 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 814
Thanked 899 Times in 733 Posts

System Specs

Windows XP or XPx64 using more than 2 CPU's???

So... according to MS, this is the lowdown on #CPUs supported by OS:

Operating system Number of processors Physical RAM
Microsoft Windows Server 2003, Standard Edition 4 4 gigabytes (GB)
Microsoft Windows Server 2003, Standard x64 Edition 4 32 GB
Microsoft Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition 8 64 GB
Microsoft Windows Server 2003, Enterprise x64 Edition 8 1 terabyte
Microsoft Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition 32 128 GB
Microsoft Windows Server 2003, Datacenter x64 Edition 64 1 terabyte
Microsoft Windows XP Professional 2 4 GB
Microsoft Windows XP Professional x64 Edition 2 128 GB

Question regarding XP and XPx64... are there any other flavors or upgrades of XP that will use more than 2 physical processors? Yes, I know going to Server 2003 is one answer.

I assume this means having a quad core and XP will do you not a shit bit of good...?
Sasqui is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2007, 08:13 PM   #2
Grings
1000 Posts
 
Grings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 1,983 (0.83/day)
Thanks: 96
Thanked 187 Times in 166 Posts

System Specs

i think microsoft differentiate between cores and physical cpu's, so you could use 2 quad cores with xp
Grings is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2007, 09:22 PM   #3
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.49/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Yeah Grings is right. Microsoft basically goes by the number of cpu sockets. XP Pro will support systems with 2 cpu sockets filled, the number of cores doesn't matter. If they existed, you could run 2 1,000 core cpus on XP Pro.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 02:08 PM   #4
Sasqui
Eligible for custom title
 
Sasqui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,041 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 814
Thanked 899 Times in 733 Posts

System Specs

It looks that way. I got this from a Microsoft “fact sheet”:

" Multiprocessing and multicore support. The platform is designed to support up to two single-core or multicore x64 processors for maximum performance and scalability with no additional licensing cost to customers. "

Now… the way I read that, if you have two quad core processors, it will indeed use all eight physical cores. There isn’t much more detail that I could find other than that statement. If anyone has any concrete links, please do share.
Sasqui is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 04:54 PM   #5
DanTheBanjoman
Seņor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.59/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

Support isn't a problem, it is licensing. And Microsoft indeed counts on a per socket basis. The discussion started way back with HTT.
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts