|
Jun 8, 2005, 12:45 AM
|
#11 |
 Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,497 (0.84/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 46 Times in 29 Posts
 |
I know what you mean there. It should push the prices of the X850's and so on down too.
-Dan |
|
|
|
Jun 8, 2005, 04:48 AM
|
#12 | |
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California, U.S.A.
Posts: 1,990 (0.62/day)
Thanks: 552
Thanked 511 Times in 216 Posts
|
Quote:
It could spell a lot of trouble for Ati to be in such a position...
__________________
Main Rig: See System Specs HTPC Game room: Ci7 SB 2600K@4.5Ghz - Asus ROG Maximus IV Gene-Z - EVGA 2xGTX680s SLI - 4x4GBs GSkill Ripjaws - 2x120GBs Vertex 3MIOPS - OCZ 1.25 kW PSU HTPC Bedroom: C2Q Q9550@3.4Ghz - Asus ROG Striker II - EVGA 2xGTX680s SLI - 2x4GBs Kingston HyperX - 2x120GBs Agility 3 - SB Recon3D - Silverstone 1 kW PSU Lappy: Samsung Series 7 NP700G7C - Ci7 IVB 3610QM@2.3~3.3Ghz - 17.3" 1920x1080 120 Hz - GeForce GTX675M - 16GBs 1600Mhz RAM - 512GBs Crucial M4 - 6X BluRay |
|
|
|
|
Jun 8, 2005, 06:20 AM
|
#13 |
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,316 (1.35/day)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 166 Times in 89 Posts
 |
Well no one knows how well it is going for nvidia, either.
__________________
bellybuttons are great holes, their single purpose is to suck up pinkys
-DanTheBanjoman |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why the FX line sucks/sucked so bad. | AshenSugar | Graphics Cards | 36 | Feb 14, 2007 12:23 AM |
| ATI's answer to Intel's 975x ? | //mAr | News | 15 | Jun 2, 2006 07:26 PM |
| guesses on Nvidia's answer to the X1900? | naseltzer | Graphics Cards | 26 | Feb 2, 2006 11:22 PM |
| NVIDIA's G80 to battle ATI's R580 in 06 | bishop40k | News | 5 | Jul 21, 2005 03:58 PM |
System Specs
