![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() |
60hz vs 70hz
just curious can anyone explain to me the difference between the two of these? will one look better/perform better than the other? I can sort of tell a difference when I switch my monitor between the two but I cant figure out what the difference is..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: England
Posts: 2,690 (1.09/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 157 Times in 134 Posts
|
70Hz give you a better refresh rate, so it reduces flicker on your monitor.
__________________
[img disabled]http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/anti_mind_virus.png[/img] Knowlege is power. Power corrupts. Be evil, study hard. “E-mail Devil-Boy challenging him to a duel. Sabers, if possible.” -DanTheBanjoman
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 342 (0.16/day)
Thanks: 44
Thanked 59 Times in 25 Posts
|
You notice it more at higher resolutions, eg 640x480 @ 60Hz looks fine but 1600x1200 @ 60Hz looks very flickery! If you have the option to increase the refresh rate you should do so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() |
Also some people are sensitive to various refresh rates. A friend of mine got badly ill after gaming on a 60hz monitor. Took us a while to figure out what happened, but increasing the refresh rate past 70hz solves the problem.
I've even heard of some people having seizures, but I wouldn't know firsthand.
__________________
![]() “it's unit of measure for preasure, and at <100 it's enough to suck a rats eye balls out threw his ass!” -nora.e
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 342 (0.16/day)
Thanks: 44
Thanked 59 Times in 25 Posts
|
It's along the same lines of people being sensitive to strobe lighting. It happened to a friend of mine who (at the time) was using an amstrad CPC 464. Going back a few years now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: techPowerUp!
Posts: 1,107 (0.43/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 36 Times in 34 Posts
|
It doesn't apply to LCD monitors though, 60hz is fine for LCD monitors because they work differently than CRT monitors. 60hz on a CRT is awful, but 60hz on an LCD doesn't even make a difference.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dawsonville, GA
Posts: 467 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 187
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
Personally, I can't look at a CRT under 75hz. But my eyesight is horrible
.
__________________
“Nemesis is supposed to be badass.” -Metal-Head
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Maximum Overclocker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12,236 (5.16/day)
Thanks: 2,054
Thanked 2,039 Times in 1,549 Posts
|
I've been 60hz since I was 8 (I'm 15 now). Doesn't bother me, thank god, cause I got a 60hz monitor and they are very expensive to go out and buy one just to get more refresh cycles/sec
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: techPowerUp!
Posts: 1,107 (0.43/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 36 Times in 34 Posts
|
Quote:
EDIT: I can take about 72hz.. that's what I ran my old CRT on. Looks a WHOLE lot better and more soothing to the eyes IMO. 75 is even better but I couldn't run 75hz at 1280 res.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() |
I do notice a difference between 60hz and 70hz on a lcd monitor, now that I have tried it out. in games everything is much smoother and if I turn really sharp I wont notice as many screen refreshes. 70hz ftw!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,985 (0.80/day)
Thanks: 131
Thanked 295 Times in 275 Posts
|
I game fine on my 17" CRT @ 60 Hz...and my eyesight is terrible too!!! I can stare at it for hours and hours and hours.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: techPowerUp!
Posts: 1,107 (0.43/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 36 Times in 34 Posts
|
It does not make a difference on an LCD monitor.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Power User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.49/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
|
He's right. It doesn't matter what you set the refresh rate to in the software, the LCD's hardware converts it to 60Hz for display. It's the LCD's natural refresh rate. Any difference you think you may notice is just the placebo effect.
CRTs are entirely different story, altogether. The higher, the better on a CRT.
__________________
![]() Visit Ashentech “What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dawsonville, GA
Posts: 467 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 187
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
“Nemesis is supposed to be badass.” -Metal-Head
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() |
eh, my LCD is set at 74 HZ right now and it was set at 60hz. you're telling me that the settings on my monitor is not true?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Power User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.49/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
|
Well, sort of. The signal going to the monitor is 74Hz, but the monitor still only outputs 60Hz if it's an LCD.
__________________
![]() Visit Ashentech “What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Power User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.49/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
|
More or less. It's just the nature of the way pixels respond, and the way it interacts with the backlight.
__________________
![]() Visit Ashentech “What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Doctor Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,544 (10.98/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,686 Times in 6,387 Posts
|
CRT: 72Hz is the 'official' flicker free refresh rate
LCD: stuck at 60, because they dont HAVE a refresh rate. Refresh rate is how often the entire screen updates, but LCD do it pixel-by-pixel, so the screen itself (8ms, 2ms, 16ms, etc) determines how well it does here. Setting the refresh higher on an LCD only allows you to run a higher FPS if you have Vsync on, it really doesnt change anything else.
__________________
![]() Edumacational thread about PC Audio My external HDD's.5x samsung 1TB + 2x Seagate 1.5TB = 8 TB external storage 32 Bit OS vs 64 bit OS information How to get hardware accelerated H264 playback (DXVA) Netbook Owners United! |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() |
okies, well thanks. back down to 60hz for me then...no point making something work harder than it has to
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Eligible for custom title
|
60Hz vs 70Hz.... very confusing question.
If you are on TFT, then probably the 60Hz is better. The electronics of most TFTs are designed to match 60Hz to give a rock solid screen. If you run too fast, then some colors tend to shimmer ot moire. If you have a CRT, then usually 70Hz is much better, and less likely to interfere with your incandescent lighting. However, sometimes the resolution of the faster speed maxes out at a lower resolution. Horses for courses. Try it. And see what works best with your screen+graphics card+lighting situation. (PS. I run my TFT's at 60Hz... MUCH MUCH better image stability and colour control than 70Hz.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia, Sydney
Posts: 5,023 (2.07/day)
Thanks: 412
Thanked 361 Times in 266 Posts
|
I run at 75
![]() Anyway, higher refresh rates generally give smoother action.
__________________
AMD Radeon X1950~HD4000 Support Clubhouse “Mac: "Woah, what are you doing?" Mac says as he levitates in the air.
PC: "Playing Half-Life 2, this is my gravity gun."
Mac: "Well I can sort of do that."
PC: "Technically Mac, you have to become me first."” -From_Nowhere
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,378 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 511
Thanked 144 Times in 131 Posts
|
Woot I've been running my CRT with 60hz for 11 years now lol, I know still stuck with old ACER CRT
hehehe just saving greens for newer parts or maybe move unto LCD , off topic tho, which 1 eats more electricity lcd or crt? Thanks
__________________
![]() Siggy c/o stefanels!! Thanks man \m/ Knowledge is power, guard it well.
Solaris Utility DVD 3.0 Hail to the mod godz! CyberDruid and MKmods GPU-Z Validation erocke'rs GPU Driver Uninstall Guide |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Eat, sleep, game!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Great Yarmouth, England
Posts: 5,321 (1.67/day)
Thanks: 614
Thanked 530 Times in 430 Posts
|
My Sony 19" SXGA LCD monitor only does 60Hz and Im happy with that
At first I thought it must be shit because my 17" LCD would go upto 75Hz.This may be of interest to you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frames_...in_video_games
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | ||
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: techPowerUp!
Posts: 1,107 (0.43/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 36 Times in 34 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|