techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 29, 2007, 07:25 AM   #1
malware
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to malware Send a message via MSN to malware Send a message via Skype™ to malware

System Specs

Microsoft Issues Windows Vista Hotfix for Gaming - KB940105

Microsoft has made available the following Windows Vista KB940105 hotfix. All NVIDIA GeForce 6, 7 and 8 series users should install this update in order to resolve potential Graphics Virtual Address problems that may occur when running Windows Vista OS. This hotfix resolves abnormal application behavior such as crashes and extremely low frame rates when running some 3D applications at very high graphics settings. This issue has been most commonly noticed on high-end graphics cards and the following applications: Battlefield 2, Battlefield 2142, Civilization IV, Company of Heroes, Half-Life 2, Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle Earth II, Supreme Commander, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas. In order for this hotfix to be effective, GeForce customers must also update to the latest ForceWare Release 163 drivers.

Source: Microsoft
malware is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2007, 10:49 AM   #2
mikey8684
200 Posts
 
mikey8684's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Infront Of PC ... Perth, WA
Posts: 352 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 26
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts

System Specs

anyone put it to the test yet ?

might DL soon

mikey8684 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2007, 11:08 AM   #3
NympH
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 38 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts

Im using it, but i don't notice any difference, as usual...
NympH is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2007, 11:11 AM   #4
Zero Cool
500 Posts
 
Zero Cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Prague, CZ
Posts: 585 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Zero Cool

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by NympH View Post
Im using it, but i don't notice any difference, as usual...
nothing stopped working? thats unusual!
Zero Cool is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2007, 11:42 AM   #5
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.99/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

Are the Geforce 6,7 and 8 cards more prone to problems with gaming in Windows vista?
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2007, 11:55 AM   #6
Zero Cool
500 Posts
 
Zero Cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Prague, CZ
Posts: 585 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Zero Cool

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by WarEagleAU View Post
Are the Geforce 6,7 and 8 cards more prone to problems with gaming in Windows vista?
then...ATi?

Gaming was fine on my 7900gtx
Zero Cool is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2007, 12:23 PM   #7
Pinchy
3500 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 4,650 (1.80/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 360 Times in 344 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Pinchy

System Specs

All games are fine on the 6800GO in the laptop. Dont see a reason to update to it (plus i cant update to 163 drivers....stupid dell ).
__________________
mATX rig: TT Lanbox Lite, GA-G33M-DS2R, q9300, 4GB G.Skill Pi PC8000, 2x640GB Samsung F1's in RAID 0, LG 20x DVD+/RW, HIS IceQ HD4670 512MB, Gigabyte G-Power PRO, TT 450W TR2 RX Modular PSU
HTPC: i-Cute iBox, GA-MA780GM-S2H, 4850e, 2GB G.Skill PC6400, 1x640GB WD SE16, Onboard HD3200, D-link XtremeN PCIe, Leadtek WinFast DVR3100 H Tuner, 450W Vantec PSU
Server: Custom made case, EPIA Mini-ITX mobo, 1GHz VIA, 1GB PC2700 SO-DIMM, 1TB WD, Gigabit PCI LAN card, 60W 12V AC adapter
Pinchy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2007, 03:03 PM   #8
Flint
25 Posts
 
Flint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: G'burg, MD
Posts: 41 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

...and what about users of ATI video cards? the MS site says nothing about this being exclusive to any brand, so is this recommended for us ATI users too? http://support.microsoft.com/kb/940105
Flint is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2007, 03:30 PM   #9
FAXA
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 158 (0.07/day)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

System Specs

My BF2 has stopped crashing YAY!!!
__________________
He who laughs last thinks slowest.

011000110110100001100101011001010111001101100101

FAXA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2007, 03:54 PM   #10
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,544 (10.98/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,686 Times in 6,387 Posts

System Specs

i've been running this one for a while, anandtech has info about it.

this DOES work on ATI. What it does, is fixes a bug.


In DX9, the video card ram was shadowed into the memory address space, so that the 32 bit programs/drivers could access and modify it as if it was system ram.

However, for some reason it was always maxed out in vista - if you have a 768MB GTX, that was 768MB of address space gone. Under 32 bit vista, when you hit 4GB address space.... you crashed. BF2142 on titan maps was very prone to this.

All this fix does is reduces the amount a fair bit, so its not at max - a 768MB card might use 200-300MB now, giving you some more headroom before you crash. A proper fix should come out some time in the future, but most people are reccomending vista x64 instead.


P.S
It should be noted that this affects memory *address space* and not system memory itself - system memory is part of the address space, video card ram, and all shadowed ROM's (bios, PCI cards, etc use some) - however, i have noticed 1-200MB less ram usage after installing this, i assume this difference will be lower for users with less than 512MB of total video ram.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mussels For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 29, 2007, 03:59 PM   #11
Flint
25 Posts
 
Flint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: G'burg, MD
Posts: 41 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

Thanks, Mussels. I'll DL it later on.
Flint is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2007, 04:02 PM   #12
Grings
1000 Posts
 
Grings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 1,983 (0.83/day)
Thanks: 96
Thanked 187 Times in 166 Posts

System Specs

good find mussels, i wonder if this would help that guy having issues with 2 1gb 2900's and 8gb ram that was on here a while back (i know he was on 64 bit, but maybe theres a good few bugs linked to extra address space available)
Grings is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2007, 05:27 PM   #13
effmaster
1000 Posts
 
effmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rocket City, Alabama (Huntsville)
Posts: 1,013 (0.48/day)
Thanks: 91
Thanked 78 Times in 37 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to effmaster

System Specs

Does this update only affect desktop video cards or will it work on My geforce Go 7600 even though its a laptop graphics card it has 256 MB on it
effmaster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2007, 08:18 PM   #14
wiak
1000 Posts
 
wiak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,681 (0.53/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 199 Times in 156 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
i've been running this one for a while, anandtech has info about it.

this DOES work on ATI. What it does, is fixes a bug.


In DX9, the video card ram was shadowed into the memory address space, so that the 32 bit programs/drivers could access and modify it as if it was system ram.

However, for some reason it was always maxed out in vista - if you have a 768MB GTX, that was 768MB of address space gone. Under 32 bit vista, when you hit 4GB address space.... you crashed. BF2142 on titan maps was very prone to this.

All this fix does is reduces the amount a fair bit, so its not at max - a 768MB card might use 200-300MB now, giving you some more headroom before you crash. A proper fix should come out some time in the future, but most people are reccomending vista x64 instead.


P.S
It should be noted that this affects memory *address space* and not system memory itself - system memory is part of the address space, video card ram, and all shadowed ROM's (bios, PCI cards, etc use some) - however, i have noticed 1-200MB less ram usage after installing this, i assume this difference will be lower for users with less than 512MB of total video ram.
yep vista x64 is the best system for you gaming rig ^^
vista 32bit is the best system for you htpc
in vista x64 you get more than 3GB RAM!, this is why you can get upto 16GB on motherboards when running x64 version of windows aka windows amd64

all heil to amd for getting this revolution to the consumer
wiak is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2007, 10:54 PM   #15
Solidus J2K
 
Solidus J2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lima - Perú
Posts: 3 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

Bioshock now works fine in Dx10 mode (no more RT 2.03 + D3DOverride Triple Buffering in DX10 enable)
__________________
||CPU|| Intel C2D E6300 @ 3.0Ghz 1.44v w/ Arctic Freezer 7 Pro ||MOBO|| ASUS P5N-E SLI w/ ThermalRight HR-05 SLI + ThermalTake EXTREME SPIRIT II ||RAM|| G.Skill 2x1GB DDR2 800 @ 860 w/ Evercool NEON CRAB. ||GPU|| Foxconn 8800GTS 575/1800 w/ ThermalRight HR-03+ ||CASE|| MGE XG Dragon ||PSU|| HEC Winpower 550W ||HD|| Seagate ATA200GB / SATA80GB

Last edited by Solidus J2K; Aug 29, 2007 at 11:58 PM.
Solidus J2K is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 30, 2007, 03:18 AM   #16
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,544 (10.98/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,686 Times in 6,387 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grings View Post
good find mussels, i wonder if this would help that guy having issues with 2 1gb 2900's and 8gb ram that was on here a while back (i know he was on 64 bit, but maybe theres a good few bugs linked to extra address space available)
Yes. He'd have lost 2GB just to his cards alone, with the bug.

Quote:
Originally Posted by effmaster View Post
Does this update only affect desktop video cards or will it work on My geforce Go 7600 even though its a laptop graphics card it has 256 MB on it
This affects the vista OS - however, with only a 256MB card, it wouldnt affect it all that much.
Dont forget you need the 163.xx drivers, they arent available on laptops yet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wiak View Post
yep vista x64 is the best system for you gaming rig ^^
vista 32bit is the best system for you htpc
in vista x64 you get more than 3GB RAM!, this is why you can get upto 16GB on motherboards when running x64 version of windows aka windows amd64

all heil to amd for getting this revolution to the consumer
Vista64 is great - so is 4GB ram
And shhhh, the intel users *cough* who are running x64 *cough* might hear you

(Intel did have 64 bit first, just not a chip that did 32 and 64 simultaneously)
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3, 2007, 10:13 AM   #17
R_1
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 449 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 39 Times in 26 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
(Intel did have 64 bit first, just not a chip that did 32 and 64 simultaneously)
There was Intel Itanium possessor in year 2003 when AMD64 was introduced on the market. I still remember looking Intel website - the cheapest price was 7000$ for a CPU. It was a server CPU on PCB with DDRSDRAM level3 cash and IA-64 architecture. Intel didn't manage to sell even 10 000 of this CPU till 2003 , but MS made an OS for Itanium. There was an opinion that Itanium CPU is only for DB servers and it is a long term Intel goal to introduce 64bit computing to the desktop PC's (10 yarns or so).
R_1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3, 2007, 07:51 PM   #18
Grings
1000 Posts
 
Grings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 1,983 (0.83/day)
Thanks: 96
Thanked 187 Times in 166 Posts

System Specs

Itanium wasnt x86 though, and no more compatible with x86 than the 64bit RISC chips in the early 90's
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIPS_architecture
Grings is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts