Official X1950Pro vs 7900GS Database

[tigger]

my chip is at 3.2ghz,not 3.5ghz.

soon(this week) i am getting a e6750 and a asus p5k-dlx,i am hoping to try the 6750 in my p5b-dlx before my mate takes it.

[p_o_s_pc]

Here is 3D mark 03 after some new drivers and tweaking my RAM ORB link http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...0&UID=10910506
I will have AM3 soon. Video card is 560/900

[BTK]

I have a 7900gs NOT a GT @ theonetruewill

-----------
so it's like this

7900gs oc'd and good single core

3d05 - 10.5k
3D06 - 5.2k

with oc'd core 2 duo in 3d06 - 6k

and vmodded with c2d you get 7.1k in 3d06

--------

i think 7900gs is >x1950pro and 7900gt if oc'd enough and >7900gtx if vmodded

here's mine NOT vmodded 3D05

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/66/3d05bn5.jpg

10.5k 05

and 06 and member 06 is multithreaded and i got single core

http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/7716/3d06ku3.jpg
5.2k

with a 3 GHz C2d that would easilty be over 6k

http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e19/leebragg/6048.jpg
not vmodded

amd then vmodded

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/9669/06in1.jpg

[theonetruewill]

@ Newtekie and others- I've specified new options for the FEAR benchmark to make it really quite excruciating on the cards but allow everyone's screen to perform it at a relatively low resolution; so could you please change to those settings and re-post.
Thanks

Here's mine.
Min: 29 Average: 66 Max: 191

Oh and just for laughs there's also an example of how wrong CPU-Z can get it!

[p_o_s_pc]

I don't have FEAR so that is one i am not going to be able to use.

[theonetruewill]

Originally Posted by p_o_s_pc

I don't have FEAR so that is one i am not going to be able to use.

Thats my point- it's great benchmark, BUT we need one we can all use I'm gonna try out the Serious Sam 2 demo in the Downloads section

[mitsirfishi]

Originally Posted by tigger69

heres my 3d05

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...0&UID=10907594

decent score tigger nice to see someone on the x1950 bench

[tigger]

thanks i wasnt expecting over 10k to be honest.

[p_o_s_pc]

i got over 110k in AM3 will post SS when i get my rig back online

[mitsirfishi]

well one of my singles scores 11k easy and they are 256mb depends on your clockspeeds on your card mine push 650/1550 and 650/1640 wish the mem and cores clocked like the xt's

[p_o_s_pc]

here is a SS of AM3
CPU 2.8ghz GPU 560 vram 902

[newtekie1]

Originally Posted by theonetruewill

@ Newtekie and others- I've specified new options for the FEAR benchmark to make it really quite excruciating on the cards but allow everyone's screen to perform it at a relatively low resolution; so could you please change to those settings and re-post.
Thanks

Here's mine.
Min: 29 Average: 66 Max: 191

Oh and just for laughs there's also an example of how wrong CPU-Z can get it!

So you want it on High and Maximum for graphics, got you. I just set both to Maximum. I'll re-run it and just replace the screenshot(so you should only have to change the numbers).

EDIT: New numbers on in! 46/81/215

Originally Posted by theonetruewill

Thats my point- it's great benchmark, BUT we need one we can all use I'm gonna try out the Serious Sam 2 demo in the Downloads section

FEAR Multiplayer is a free download and has the benchmark build in also.

EDIT: Nevermind, it forces you to switch to SinglePlayer when you use it...

[theonetruewill]

Originally Posted by newtekie1

So you want it on High and Maximum for graphics, got you. I just set both to Maximum. I'll re-run it and just replace the screenshot(so you should only have to change the numbers).

EDIT: New numbers on in! 46/81/215



FEAR Multiplayer is a free download and has the benchmark build in also.

EDIT: Nevermind, it forces you to switch to SinglePlayer when you use it...

Make sure every option is set as in my attachments on the first post- everything is set to max or on- bar the few that make it run faster.

[newtekie1]

Originally Posted by theonetruewill

Make sure every option is set as in my attachments on the first post- everything is set to max or on- bar the few that make it run faster.

That is what I did, that is also exactly the same as just setting Computer to High and Graphics Card to Maximum.

[theonetruewill]

What the hell- why is my score so low??? Computer also goes to "Maximum". You got V-sync on?

[newtekie1]

Originally Posted by theonetruewill

What the hell- why is my score so low??? Computer also goes to "Maximum". You got V-sync on?

No, I don't have V-Sync on, why would I artificially limit my framerate in a benchmark, that defeats the purpose of a benchmark.

[theonetruewill]

Originally Posted by newtekie1

No, I don't have V-Sync on, why would I artificially limit my framerate in a benchmark, that defeats the purpose of a benchmark.

oh shit- .......shhhh about my intellectual inadequacies! No really- how the damn hell didn't I work that out...

[newtekie1]

We all have our brain farts from time to time.

[p_o_s_pc]

Originally Posted by newtekie1

We all have our brain farts from time to time.

not me.(jk)

[JC316]

Why not throw in the 2600XT and the 8600's as well, since they are the "replacements" ATM for those card?

[theonetruewill]

Originally Posted by JC316

Why not throw in the 2600XT and the 8600's as well, since they are the "replacements" ATM for those card?

It started as a thread for people comparing the 7900GS and 1950Pro primarily but to be honest it's a tad on the shady side when it comes to my agenda. I want to create a complete database of all graphics benchmarks and this was a great way to get the best layout and experiment with the links while also putting an end to the questions over which is better: the 7900GS stock and oc'd vs 1950Pro stock and oc'd. If all goes well I may try to start a complete benchmark compilation in this style.

I want to keep this thread separate at the moment, but I could create another one just for the 2600's vs 8600's? Oh and also, any changes to the layout if I were to do this?

[JC316]

Originally Posted by theonetruewill

It started as a thread for people comparing the 7900GS and 1950Pro primarily but to be honest it's a tad on the shady side when it comes to my agenda. I want to create a complete database of all graphics benchmarks and this was a great way to get the best layout and experiment with the links while also putting an end to the questions over which is better: the 7900GS stock and oc'd vs 1950Pro stock and oc'd. If all goes well I may try to start a complete benchmark compilation in this style.

I want to keep this thread separate at the moment, but I could create another one just for the 2600's vs 8600's? Oh and also, any changes to the layout if I were to do this?

Hmm, with just the 2600XT vs the 8600's, I know who is going to win that, but when you throw in other "Mid range" cards, you can see how well it does. I may make one like this for all of the midrange cards.

[Kursah]

Here's my 7 month old Powercolor x1950pro, it will only OC to 621/756 with timings modified bios, 770 w/stock timings in bios. It does great in games still, I still wish it would OC more on the core, not so sure about vmodding the GPU on it...

Well here's my score screens (one orb link for 05) in AQ, 3dm01, 03, 05 and 06, it's been a while since I ran them, figured I'd run them again and see what I could get.

3dM 05 Link, Score 10919...: http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...0&UID=10918838

[Widjaja]

Another addition to the 3DMARK05 bench for x1950PRO.
This was more than I expected from my system and this is without the driver futuremark provides to give you the best possible mark.

Stock settings:-
AMD X2 4800+ @ 2.4Ghz
Sapphire X1950pro 512MB AGP @ 580/702





http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...0&UID=10920041

One guy I met on a forum benched his rev2 Sapphire with his P42.8Ghz and only scored 5300 or something like that in 05 which shows how much a CPU can bottleneck a GPU.

[mitsirfishi]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5511933
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3423743
there is a x1950pro cf run will it finnaly be put on the 1st page :P