![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
|
G.Skill DDR3-1600 CL7 is Coming
Taiwan-based memory manufacturer G.Skill announced today right after Super Talent its new DDR3-1600 CL7-7-7-18 (F3-12800CL7D-2GBHZ) memory modules. The new high-end G.Skill memory guarantees clock speed of 1600MHz (PC3-12800) and timings of CL7-7-7-18. The new F3-12800CL7D-2GBHZ kit is available now in matched pair of 2x 1GB modules. G.Skill also offers lifetime warranty with these modules. For more information and specifications of the new PK series products, please go here.
![]() Source: G.Skill Last edited by malware; Sep 12, 2007 at 07:34 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Semi-Retired Folder
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,746 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,114 Times in 3,705 Posts
|
It seems to me that DDR3 latencies are coming down and speeds are going up a lot quicker than DDR2 latencies and speeds did. That might just be me though...
__________________
Rig1: System Specs. Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5 Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Bird of Prey
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.98/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
|
Wow, seems DDR2 is maxed out and now all companies are plodding on the DDR3 line. Impressive looking ram and nice heatsinks to boot. Wont be too much longer and the timings should go down to around 4 or 5
__________________
=-TheEagle-= ![]() http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454 “You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120 - Edited for content and clarity
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rocket City, Alabama (Huntsville)
Posts: 1,013 (0.48/day)
Thanks: 91
Thanked 78 Times in 37 Posts
|
Quote:
And yes i hope we all know that its better to have higher slock speeds than lower latencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Power User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.48/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
|
Not always. My system does better with 1000MHz 4-4-4-12, than it does at 1200MHz 5-5-5-15.
__________________
![]() Visit Ashentech “What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rocket City, Alabama (Huntsville)
Posts: 1,013 (0.48/day)
Thanks: 91
Thanked 78 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Power User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.48/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
|
Everything that is ram intensive. And I mean everything.
__________________
![]() Visit Ashentech “What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rocket City, Alabama (Huntsville)
Posts: 1,013 (0.48/day)
Thanks: 91
Thanked 78 Times in 37 Posts
|
but last I heard was that when it came to games Higher MHZ was better than latency????
![]() ![]()
__________________
“i'd wear tpu panties.” -Random Murderer
“Good to see that you have your issue resolved!!Can I have 700 dollars?” -3991vhtes
Mussels i only pissed on the electric fence after i was told not to - DONT DO THAT.)Musselsif erotic thoughts made me have seizures, i'd stop looking at porn How to clean your toilet: http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=40450 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Power User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.48/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
|
It just depends. Sometimes Ram can do more work at a lower frequency, but tighter timings, because it's getting more accomplished per clock. It depends on the difference in frequency and timings.
__________________
![]() Visit Ashentech “What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|