techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Sep 12, 2007, 03:16 PM   #1
malware
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to malware Send a message via MSN to malware Send a message via Skype™ to malware

System Specs

G.Skill DDR3-1600 CL7 is Coming

Taiwan-based memory manufacturer G.Skill announced today right after Super Talent its new DDR3-1600 CL7-7-7-18 (F3-12800CL7D-2GBHZ) memory modules. The new high-end G.Skill memory guarantees clock speed of 1600MHz (PC3-12800) and timings of CL7-7-7-18. The new F3-12800CL7D-2GBHZ kit is available now in matched pair of 2x 1GB modules. G.Skill also offers lifetime warranty with these modules. For more information and specifications of the new PK series products, please go here.




Source: G.Skill

Last edited by malware; Sep 12, 2007 at 07:34 PM.
malware is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 12, 2007, 03:57 PM   #2
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,746 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,114 Times in 3,705 Posts

System Specs

It seems to me that DDR3 latencies are coming down and speeds are going up a lot quicker than DDR2 latencies and speeds did. That might just be me though...
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 12, 2007, 03:58 PM   #3
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.98/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

Wow, seems DDR2 is maxed out and now all companies are plodding on the DDR3 line. Impressive looking ram and nice heatsinks to boot. Wont be too much longer and the timings should go down to around 4 or 5
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 12, 2007, 05:40 PM   #4
effmaster
1000 Posts
 
effmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rocket City, Alabama (Huntsville)
Posts: 1,013 (0.48/day)
Thanks: 91
Thanked 78 Times in 37 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to effmaster

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by WarEagleAU View Post
Wow, seems DDR2 is maxed out and now all companies are plodding on the DDR3 line. Impressive looking ram and nice heatsinks to boot. Wont be too much longer and the timings should go down to around 4 or 5
Unless im mistaken and correct me if im wrong on this the higher the clock speed the higher the latency in general (i mean sure you can reduce latency to a degree butg not by that much really) and last i checked DDR3 clock speeds are going up and the clocks will probably for the most part either stay put where they are or go up 1 or for latency. Correct me if im wrong about any of this please.

And yes i hope we all know that its better to have higher slock speeds than lower latencies
effmaster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 13, 2007, 08:16 AM   #5
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.48/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by effmaster View Post
And yes i hope we all know that its better to have higher slock speeds than lower latencies
Not always. My system does better with 1000MHz 4-4-4-12, than it does at 1200MHz 5-5-5-15.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 13, 2007, 08:33 PM   #6
effmaster
1000 Posts
 
effmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rocket City, Alabama (Huntsville)
Posts: 1,013 (0.48/day)
Thanks: 91
Thanked 78 Times in 37 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to effmaster

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wile E View Post
Not always. My system does better with 1000MHz 4-4-4-12, than it does at 1200MHz 5-5-5-15.
What areas does it do better in?
effmaster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 13, 2007, 08:35 PM   #7
d44ve
1000 Posts
 
d44ve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,878 (0.84/day)
Thanks: 79
Thanked 322 Times in 152 Posts
Send a message via MSN to d44ve

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by effmaster View Post
What areas does it do better in?

In the ass kicking area!


sorry... couldnt resist
d44ve is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2007, 06:55 AM   #8
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.48/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by effmaster View Post
What areas does it do better in?
Everything that is ram intensive. And I mean everything.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2007, 04:43 AM   #9
effmaster
1000 Posts
 
effmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rocket City, Alabama (Huntsville)
Posts: 1,013 (0.48/day)
Thanks: 91
Thanked 78 Times in 37 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to effmaster

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wile E View Post
Everything that is ram intensive. And I mean everything.
but last I heard was that when it came to games Higher MHZ was better than latency????
__________________
“i'd wear tpu panties.” -Random Murderer
“Good to see that you have your issue resolved!!Can I have 700 dollars?” -3991vhtes
Mussels i only pissed on the electric fence after i was told not to - DONT DO THAT.)
Musselsif erotic thoughts made me have seizures, i'd stop looking at porn
How to clean your toilet: http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=40450
effmaster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2007, 05:44 AM   #10
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.48/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by effmaster View Post
but last I heard was that when it came to games Higher MHZ was better than latency????
It just depends. Sometimes Ram can do more work at a lower frequency, but tighter timings, because it's getting more accomplished per clock. It depends on the difference in frequency and timings.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts