techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Sep 26, 2007, 02:56 AM   #1
Polaris573
Senior Moderator
 
Polaris573's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Little Rock, USA
Posts: 3,284 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 68
Thanked 765 Times in 451 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Polaris573

System Specs

AMD Announces AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black Edition

Advanced Micro Devices has announced its new central processing unit (CPU) that is officially aimed at enthusiasts and gamers who dare to overclock and tweak their systems. The new processor from the Black Edition lineup comes with unlocked multiplier, which allows to easily set it working at higher clock-speed, getting additional performance virtually for free.

The AMD Athlon 64 X2 processor 5000+ Black Edition is an affordably-priced, dual-core processor targeted to the consumer channel, boasting a customizable clock multiplier for tunable performance, enabling mainstream end-users to reap the benefits of setting their own speed limits, a statement by the world’s largest maker of x86 central processing units maker reads.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black Edition microprocessor works at 2.60GHz, features dual-channel DDR2 memory controller, 1MB of level-two cache (512KB per core) and is compatible with socket AM2 mainboards featuring 1000MHz HyperTransport bus. The chip has 65W thermal design power and is made using 65nm process technology.



The customizable clock multiplier and auto-adjustable memory frequency of the new chip enables amateurs and value-conscious enthusiasts to maximize the performance of their desktop computers without substantial hassles. Typically enthusiasts have to increase base HyperTransport bus speed from default 200MHz, which eventually causes not only CPU clock-speed boost, but also alters HT bus and memory frequency, meaning that other components apart from the microprocessor also should be able to handle increased speeds. Previously customizable clock multiplier were only available on high-end AMD Athlon 64 FX processors that could retail for as much as $1000 per chip.

Given that not all enthusiasts may want to invest additional money into high-end mainboard, memory modules and spend additional time ensuring that all components work well enough, AMD’s Black Edition processors Athlon 64 X2 6400+ and 5000+ do seem to be appealing solutions for overclocking. Since nowadays computer enthusiasts and gamers tend to acquire CPUs from Intel Corp., AMD crucially needs to attract attention of those groups with attractive options.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black Edition processors will only be available in channel market. The chips will come as processor-in-box (PIB) package, but without cooling systems. The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black Edition microprocessors cost $136 in 1000-unit quantities, up slightly from $125, the cost of typical model 5000+.

Source: X-bit Labs

Last edited by Polaris573; Sep 26, 2007 at 04:49 PM.
Polaris573 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 02:58 AM   #2
Corrosion
200 Posts
 
Corrosion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maplewood, Mn
Posts: 362 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 70
Thanked 74 Times in 51 Posts

System Specs

Im guessing this is gonna be a good chip, 65nm also its hopefully and probebly gonna oc high as hell! if this bad boy works good ill get this instead of a core 2 duo
__________________
“lol..is that cats head through a painting ?” -azazel

Corrosion is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 03:07 AM   #3
ktr
Eligible for custom title
 
ktr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bay Area, California, USA, Earth
Posts: 6,158 (2.34/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 708 Times in 595 Posts

System Specs

Not bad at all, its pretty much an FX60 with a 65nm...
ktr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 03:30 AM   #4
ChaoticBlankness
200 Posts
 
ChaoticBlankness's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: A small crate floating in the Pacific..
Posts: 408 (0.16/day)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

System Specs

Cheap, fast, unlocked, and a low power 65nm design refresh.. it's like my dual core K8 dreams are coming true.
__________________
AMD + INTEL: "Why can't we be friends..? Why can't we be friends..?"

[img disabled]http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/1774/teamfortressclubhousebn1.jpg[/IMG]

http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=60243
ChaoticBlankness is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 03:32 AM   #5
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,296 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,818
Thanked 12,454 Times in 7,920 Posts

System Specs

While this is a very cool chip, why does AMD even bother advertising a last-gen chip? All chips should be unlockable anyway, more control for the user.
I wish I went from s754 to AM2 instead of s939. I want the new stuff!!!!
__________________
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 03:46 AM   #6
pbmaster
1000 Posts
 
pbmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,985 (0.79/day)
Thanks: 131
Thanked 295 Times in 275 Posts
Send a message via AIM to pbmaster

System Specs

I wanted me a Phenom!!!
__________________


“pbmaster your tongue in your mouth speaks the truth” -von kain
pbmaster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 04:10 AM   #7
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,296 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,818
Thanked 12,454 Times in 7,920 Posts

System Specs

Me too pb. I'm itching to buy a new system... The wait is driving me to constantly push my Opteron further. It can't take much more. I'll probablly go and blow some cash on a new water cooling setup. I mean
__________________
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 04:26 AM   #8
FatForester
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 937 (0.41/day)
Thanks: 94
Thanked 155 Times in 139 Posts

System Specs

Pretty cool, but considering the amount of hype they gave it, I say WEAK!!! Yea, this is intriguing but it's based on old tech. All it really does is show how desperate AMD is. Poor AMD...
FatForester is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 04:29 AM   #9
DaMulta
My stars went supernova
 
DaMulta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma T-Town
Posts: 10,337 (4.11/day)
Thanks: 1,449
Thanked 1,477 Times in 1,113 Posts

System Specs

I bet the chip can hit 3.5 Ghz, and for a chip that will cost around 150USD that is going to be nice.
__________________
ocLIT The Hardware Punishers
DaMulta is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 05:23 AM   #10
Weer
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New York / Israel
Posts: 1,293 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 60
Thanked 95 Times in 73 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaMulta View Post
I bet the chip can hit 3.5 Ghz, and for a chip that will cost around 150USD that is going to be nice.
I wouldn't count on that. You'd have a big problem getting any K8 CPU above 3.0Ghz.
Weer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 05:29 AM   #11
DaMulta
My stars went supernova
 
DaMulta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma T-Town
Posts: 10,337 (4.11/day)
Thanks: 1,449
Thanked 1,477 Times in 1,113 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weer View Post
I wouldn't count on that. You'd have a big problem getting any K8 CPU above 3.0Ghz.
I can get my 62 to 3.2 and it's 90nm

I have seen 6000+ on the TPU hit 3.5 on AIR. That is also a 90nm Chip.

Now a chip that is 65nm and unlocked we havent seen pushed yet.
__________________
ocLIT The Hardware Punishers
DaMulta is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 05:33 AM   #12
Solaris17
Creator Solaris Utility DVD
 
Solaris17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Reinacting scenes from platoon with Charlie Sheen
Posts: 13,709 (4.79/day)
Thanks: 4,367
Thanked 3,295 Times in 2,311 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Solaris17 Send a message via AIM to Solaris17 Send a message via MSN to Solaris17 Send a message via Yahoo to Solaris17 Send a message via Skype™ to Solaris17

System Specs

i wish the actual cpu was black instead of silver
__________________
I Made the Millionth post! | "Please come to WI now so I can beat you over the head with a bratwurst."-Kreij
PS3 mod 8500/8600GT Mod Guide Rebuild a Copperhead Heat Ware
NF4 Ultra SLI Mod Solaris Utility DVD 4.0 Broken CPU pin guide
Vista Mark
Solaris17 is offline  
2 Million points folded for TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 05:41 AM   #13
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.94/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

sure is DaMulta. there is nothing wrong with milking the cow and thats what they are doing. Its not really OLD tech considering they came out with AM2s not that long ago.
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 06:03 AM   #14
DaJMasta
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 475 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 37 Times in 21 Posts

System Specs

I think it's odd the new black edition is so low with the specs (first was 6400+..... now a 5000+?) and I'm not terribly sure what makes a die shrink equate to a gamer's/OCer's chip, but It could be a very good performer regardless, and is sure to be pretty cheap.

Just too bad it will be completely overshadowed by quads and Core 2 procs.
DaJMasta is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 06:06 AM   #15
XooM
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Close to FrozenCPU.com
Posts: 478 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Send a message via AIM to XooM

System Specs

nah, its legitimately old tech; the core architecture has changed very little in what... 4 years?
__________________
“yeah i'm sorry .. i'm not so good at programming.. i just started” -W1zzard
XooM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 06:07 AM   #16
mandelore
2000 Posts
 
mandelore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK-small Village in a Valley Near Newcastle
Posts: 2,917 (1.16/day)
Thanks: 33
Thanked 152 Times in 127 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
Me too pb. I'm itching to buy a new system... The wait is driving me to constantly push my Opteron further. It can't take much more. I'll probablly go and blow some cash on a new water cooling setup. I mean
had a dream last night i was off buying 1337 DDR2 ram for my phenom setup, thats how bad its getting! its starting to invade my dreams!!!
mandelore is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 06:30 AM   #17
rhythmeister
500 Posts
 
rhythmeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Belfast...N. Ireland mate!
Posts: 822 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 32 Times in 28 Posts

System Specs

Blooming typical, I go and buy an fx-62 and now they release this wee bargain beastie!
__________________
My xbox360 says:http://www.360voice.com/tag/lof666

Feel free to add me then get cut in two with a Lancer WOOT WOOT
rhythmeister is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 08:06 AM   #18
Weer
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New York / Israel
Posts: 1,293 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 60
Thanked 95 Times in 73 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaMulta View Post
I can get my 62 to 3.2 and it's 90nm

I have seen 6000+ on the TPU hit 3.5 on AIR. That is also a 90nm Chip.

Now a chip that is 65nm and unlocked we havent seen pushed yet.
All K8 chips use the same flaw in the design - can't get above 3.0Ghz. It has nothing to do with the power envelope.

65nm on the 6000+ is the same as 80nm of the X1950 Pro - lowers temps, nothing more.
Weer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 10:44 AM   #19
rhythmeister
500 Posts
 
rhythmeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Belfast...N. Ireland mate!
Posts: 822 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 32 Times in 28 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weer View Post
All K8 chips use the same flaw in the design - can't get above 3.0Ghz. It has nothing to do with the power envelope.

65nm on the 6000+ is the same as 80nm of the X1950 Pro - lowers temps, nothing more.
Eh? MANY fx-62s can get >3.2GHz...including mine and has been verified as doing so by it's previous lucky owner, EdLSmith on DIYstreet
__________________
My xbox360 says:http://www.360voice.com/tag/lof666

Feel free to add me then get cut in two with a Lancer WOOT WOOT
rhythmeister is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 10:53 AM   #20
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.39/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weer View Post
All K8 chips use the same flaw in the design - can't get above 3.0Ghz. It has nothing to do with the power envelope.

65nm on the 6000+ is the same as 80nm of the X1950 Pro - lowers temps, nothing more.
You are flat out wrong. I've had my X2 6000+ to 3.5GHz on water. Other members have achieved the same, with a better clocking chip, on simple air.

Link with my screenshots: http://forums.techpowerup.com/showpo...0&postcount=32
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 10:57 AM   #21
DanTheBanjoman
Señor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.56/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by XooM View Post
nah, its legitimately old tech; the core architecture has changed very little in what... 4 years?
FSB increased from 400MHz (Banias) to 1600MHz (Stoakley), added 64 bit extensions (Core2), more IPC, 4 times as many cores(Kentsfield, Clovertown, etc), 4 way capable(Tigerton), SSE3, SSSE3 and SSE4(Penryn) just to name a few
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 11:15 AM   #22
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.39/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanTheBanjoman View Post
FSB increased from 400MHz (Banias) to 1600MHz (Stoakley), added 64 bit extensions (Core2), more IPC, 4 times as many cores(Kentsfield, Clovertown, etc), 4 way capable(Tigerton), SSE3, SSSE3 and SSE4(Penryn) just to name a few
I think he was talking about the core architecture of AMD cpus. AKA: K8
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 11:17 AM   #23
-=l32andon=-
25 Posts
 
-=l32andon=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 43 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weer View Post
All K8 chips use the same flaw in the design - can't get above 3.0Ghz. It has nothing to do with the power envelope.

65nm on the 6000+ is the same as 80nm of the X1950 Pro - lowers temps, nothing more.
I can't believe that you are saying a 6000+ cannot get above 3.0GHz. I can hit 3.4 with mine on air. That's with cheapie xms2 ram! Runs all 3Dmark apps & wPrime, etc.... stable.
I would love to get one of these 65nm chips, but I'll wait for the quads. Really wish the 6000+ was an unlocked 65nm , just imagine that!
-=l32andon=- is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2007, 11:21 AM   #24
DanTheBanjoman
Señor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.56/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wile E View Post
I think he was talking about the core architecture of AMD cpus. AKA: K8
Confusing name Core is
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DanTheBanjoman For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 26, 2007, 11:25 AM   #25
-=l32andon=-
25 Posts
 
-=l32andon=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 43 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

6000+ is K8, right? if he's talking about all K8 architecture then the 6000+ is included.
-=l32andon=- is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts