![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a (0/day)
|
multiplier or fsb
i noticed that the 5000 black box is doing pretty good because of an unlocked multiplier. i thought that a high multiplier was worse for your OC untill memory started to keep you back. i thought that was the whole point behind 2000 fsb
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Maximum Overclocker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12,236 (5.15/day)
Thanks: 2,054
Thanked 2,039 Times in 1,549 Posts
|
You don't have 2000 FSB. If I had 2000 FSB, my CPU would be running at 26GHz (I wish!!
)Your HT link is 1000, the link with the rest of the system, and it is double-pumped, therefore they come up with the 2000MHz HT link thing. Just like DDR800 isn't 800MHz as many people say. If thier RAM was really 800MHz, it would be DDR1600. DDR800 = 400MHz. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Severn, MD, USA.
Posts: 2,949 (1.28/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 189 Times in 185 Posts
|
Err the right combo of multiplier, memory dividers, and fsb really gets the oc working as hard as possible. Some mobos actually have a hole where if you hit that fsb, the performance drops because it loosens it's latencies.
__________________
Power User Teenager Club Laptop Overclocking club Thanks button....hit it if someone helped you, not a difficult concept really. [img disabled]http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?t=1&uid=8351&iehack=.jpg[/img] |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a (0/day)
|
o >.> well, while i'm at it, can heat make an oc unstable or just kill hardware?
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Severn, MD, USA.
Posts: 2,949 (1.28/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 189 Times in 185 Posts
|
Both.
__________________
Power User Teenager Club Laptop Overclocking club Thanks button....hit it if someone helped you, not a difficult concept really. [img disabled]http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?t=1&uid=8351&iehack=.jpg[/img] |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
I'm the only one
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HU5 1LL
Posts: 7,214 (2.75/day)
Thanks: 474
Thanked 951 Times in 780 Posts
|
i think both,but i'm not 100%
__________________
http://img.techpowerup.org/110324/v6351cpuzvalj197.jpg ]Monster E6300 oc http://www.techpowerup.com/gallery/2163.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a (0/day)
|
well, this has been an educational twenty minutes. i was wondering why i had such horrid instability at 68/59 degrees
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Maximum Overclocker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12,236 (5.15/day)
Thanks: 2,054
Thanked 2,039 Times in 1,549 Posts
|
^^lol
72C is the melting point for an Athlon
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a (0/day)
|
yep. that's why i keep it at a nice, cool 68/ next voltage increment spells death, tho.
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Maximum Overclocker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12,236 (5.15/day)
Thanks: 2,054
Thanked 2,039 Times in 1,549 Posts
|
I wouldn't consider 68c anywhere near cool. My old P4 PrescHOT only ran 54c on the stock cooler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a (0/day)
|
well, if it doesn't cause damage, it's cool enough for my needs
i've brought it up to 71 degrees before, too. i think the melting point is 74
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,985 (0.80/day)
Thanks: 131
Thanked 295 Times in 275 Posts
|
The performance loss you're seeing may actually be heat damage...I feel sorry for that CPU LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() |
You don't want athlons running above 65c load for any amount of time. You need to either increase the cooling capacity or lower your overclock...or you WILL have dead hardware.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a (0/day)
|
i'm one of those people who gets their limitations in writing and abuses whatever leeway we can get. that's military training. so, core 1 at 58, core 2 at 68. actually, now that i see heat is causing instability, i'll have to rethink that. in case i destroy something, i can get an fx-64 for under $100 from a friend of mine.
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|