techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 13, 2007, 04:19 PM   #1
malware
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to malware Send a message via MSN to malware Send a message via Skype™ to malware

System Specs

Intel Processor and Pricing Chart for Early 2008

X-bit labs has prepared a nice chart illustrating all the information available for future Intel chips including pricing of the Intel 45nm Yorkfield CPUs and info on Intel's goliath - Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770. The story also indicates that after the introduction of the new 45nm CPUs in January, 2008, Intel will not cut prices of its existing Intel Core 2 Quad processors below $266.



Source: X-bit labs
malware is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to malware For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 13, 2007, 05:36 PM   #2
zOaib
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 949 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 136
Thanked 35 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

juuuicy !!!!

I AM LOOKIN AT THE Q9550 2.83GHZ FOR $530 MMMM MMMM !
zOaib is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 13, 2007, 05:48 PM   #3
nflesher87
Staff
 
nflesher87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine
Posts: 4,279 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 411
Thanked 480 Times in 428 Posts
Send a message via AIM to nflesher87 Send a message via MSN to nflesher87

System Specs

ok now AMD your turn to strike back
nflesher87 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 13, 2007, 05:50 PM   #4
DOM
Eligible for custom title
 
DOM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: TX, USA
Posts: 6,464 (2.54/day)
Thanks: 292
Thanked 790 Times in 706 Posts

System Specs

I think im going with the Q9450

any news on what multiplier they have ??
__________________
DOM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 13, 2007, 05:55 PM   #5
panchoman
Sold my stars!
 
panchoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,650 (3.12/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 1,227 Times in 1,036 Posts

System Specs

q6600 only 40 bucks more then the e6600 wtf...
__________________


Need any Graphics Made? Visit Graphic Artists United!
R.I.P Megan--Heaven has a new angel
panchoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 13, 2007, 06:12 PM   #6
Jizzler
2000 Posts
 
Jizzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOM_ATI_X800XL_PCI-E View Post
I think im going with the Q9450

any news on what multiplier they have ??
Divide the Mhz of the CPU by the bus.

1066Mhz QP = 266Mhz and 1333Mhz QP = 333Mhz.

The Q9450 (which would be my choice as well, 12MB and cheap) is 8 x 333Mhz = 2.66Ghz. At 400Mhz that's 3.2Ghz, or in other words a QX9770 for a quarter of the price. Hopefully they're easy to overclock.
Jizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 13, 2007, 06:16 PM   #7
dsdsdk
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 65 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

q9550 has 8,5 multiplier. hmm
dsdsdk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 13, 2007, 06:22 PM   #8
hat
Maximum Overclocker
 
hat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12,236 (5.16/day)
Thanks: 2,054
Thanked 2,039 Times in 1,549 Posts

System Specs

The prices of current processors aren't dropping?
__________________
My Heatware
“Inb4 smartphone LN2 overclocking.” -radrok
hat is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 13, 2007, 07:18 PM   #9
Weer
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New York / Israel
Posts: 1,293 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 60
Thanked 95 Times in 73 Posts

System Specs

It's funny you call the QX9770 "Goliath".
Because it is defeated by my "David" - Q6600 @ 3.8Ghz (4.0Ghz possible).

Ironic, isn't it?
Weer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 13, 2007, 07:45 PM   #10
Morgoth
2000 Posts
 
Morgoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2,650 (1.25/day)
Thanks: 80
Thanked 217 Times in 160 Posts

System Specs

wel it may have a higher overclock then the q6600?
Morgoth is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 13, 2007, 07:49 PM   #11
malware
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to malware Send a message via MSN to malware Send a message via Skype™ to malware

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weer View Post
It's funny you call the QX9770 "Goliath".
Because it is defeated by my "David" - Q6600 @ 3.8Ghz (4.0Ghz possible).

Ironic, isn't it?
How do you know that Q6600 will be faster than the fastest 45nm Yorkfield? 3.2GHz base clock, new architecture, 12MB L2...you'll need more than a 3.8GHz quad Kenti.
Don't get me wrong, but after only one run from QX9550, 11 world records were broken into pieces...you're going nowhere with your Q6600.
__________________
techPоwerUp!

Last edited by malware; Oct 13, 2007 at 08:16 PM.
malware is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 13, 2007, 08:20 PM   #12
magibeg
1000 Posts
 
magibeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,367 (0.53/day)
Thanks: 126
Thanked 200 Times in 151 Posts

System Specs

Ohh, at this rate we'll eliminate ram and just run everything from cache, while ram acts as the slow page file :P
__________________
Arguing with the moderators is like shaking your fist at God. There's nobody there; and if there is, he's not listening. And if he's listening, all you're doing is pissing him off
Fold for Tech Power Up!!
magibeg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 13, 2007, 10:23 PM   #13
Sovereign
500 Posts
 
Sovereign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 717 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 50
Thanked 65 Times in 51 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by nflesher87 View Post
ok now AMD your turn to strike back
Phenom : T-Minus 1+ months and counting!

Quote:
Originally Posted by AMD
Dubbed a successor to the Athlon, the CPU will be one of the first true quad-core desktop processors, according to AMD; unlike Intel's Core 2 Quad or Xeon 5300, the Phenom in its X4 version will have four cores that can speak directly with each other at high speed rather than two dual-core halves that need to use the less efficient system bus.
Please no flames, just responding to a bud's post.
__________________


[SOVEREIGN'S uATX HTPC : OPTERON 1216 @ 2.8Ghz] [CURRENT STABLE OC : 3.0Ghz & 2GB MEM] [POWERED BY : AMD/ATI | CRUCIAL | nVIDIA™]

PCs are a lot like air conditioners - they both work great until you open up windows!
Sovereign is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 13, 2007, 10:32 PM   #14
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.99/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

that E8800 (or whatever it is) for 266 looks very nice. Intel has finally got it with the prices, took them long enough Id say.
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 14, 2007, 01:19 AM   #15
ex_reven
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413 (1.39/day)
Thanks: 117
Thanked 181 Times in 166 Posts

System Specs

Damn. The future is looking good
ex_reven is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 14, 2007, 01:35 AM   #16
Weer
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New York / Israel
Posts: 1,293 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 60
Thanked 95 Times in 73 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by malware View Post
How do you know that Q6600 will be faster than the fastest 45nm Yorkfield? 3.2GHz base clock, new architecture, 12MB L2...you'll need more than a 3.8GHz quad Kenti.
Don't get me wrong, but after only one run from QX9550, 11 world records were broken into pieces...you're going nowhere with your Q6600.
Are you kidding?
First, off it's NOT a new architecture.
Secondly, the cache would get you like 1-5% more performance.
Thirdly, the world records were done at 5.5Ghz.
Fourthly, you know nothing about this.. but I'm not trying to be rude.

And yes, my Kentsfield will KILL ANY Yorkfield at stock.
Weer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 14, 2007, 01:37 AM   #17
J-Man
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Oakham, UK
Posts: 2,035 (0.93/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 83 Times in 81 Posts
Send a message via MSN to J-Man

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOM_ATI_X800XL_PCI-E View Post
I think im going with the Q9450

any news on what multiplier they have ??
Same.
J-Man is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 14, 2007, 01:59 AM   #18
tkpenalty
Eligible for custom title
 
tkpenalty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia, Sydney
Posts: 5,023 (2.07/day)
Thanks: 412
Thanked 361 Times in 266 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weer View Post
Are you kidding?
First, off it's NOT a new architecture.
Secondly, the cache would get you like 1-5% more performance.
Thirdly, the world records were done at 5.5Ghz.
Fourthly, you know nothing about this.. but I'm not trying to be rude.

And yes, my Kentsfield will KILL ANY Yorkfield at stock.
First off... I dont know where you are coming from but you sound like some immature, overconfident person. Seriously grow up, you have no basis to make those claims, and doing it here on the front page?

"Same architecture" Oh right, you're an intel CPU engineer now? OF COURSE NOT. Intel obviously has changed the CPU's architecture, example, longer pipelineing, etc. They arent ignorant, and by logic the new QX9xxx/E9xxx series will be faster at the same clockspeed. Even if your Q6600 can do 4.0Ghz...Do we care? This isnt the overclocking thread, this is the front page news.
__________________
AMD Radeon X1950~HD4000 Support Clubhouse

“Mac: "Woah, what are you doing?" Mac says as he levitates in the air. PC: "Playing Half-Life 2, this is my gravity gun." Mac: "Well I can sort of do that." PC: "Technically Mac, you have to become me first."” -From_Nowhere
tkpenalty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 14, 2007, 02:14 AM   #19
ex_reven
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413 (1.39/day)
Thanks: 117
Thanked 181 Times in 166 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weer View Post
Secondly, the cache would get you like 1-5% more performance.
5% more performance is 150mhz. A few mhz is often the difference between winning and losing in overclock competitions as we have seen in past news.
ex_reven is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 14, 2007, 03:11 AM   #20
TXcharger
200 Posts
 
TXcharger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SAN ANTONE, TX
Posts: 393 (0.16/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

System Specs

my e6600 looks like a 286 compared to that QX9770...
__________________
new rig! my laptop pwns your pc well most of your pc's
ASUS c90s barebone 15.4in WSXGA+ - Intel Core2Duo E6600 Conroe - Nvidia 8600gt 512mb - Corsair 2gb DDR2 RAM - Hitachi 80gb 7200rpm - Intel wireless a/b/g/N and bluetooth 2.0 - VISTA Ultimate

madness?
THIS IS TECHPOWERUP!!!
TXcharger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 14, 2007, 04:04 AM   #21
magibeg
1000 Posts
 
magibeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,367 (0.53/day)
Thanks: 126
Thanked 200 Times in 151 Posts

System Specs

If your e6600 is a 286 then my p4 has the power of a dot matrix printer :P
__________________
Arguing with the moderators is like shaking your fist at God. There's nobody there; and if there is, he's not listening. And if he's listening, all you're doing is pissing him off
Fold for Tech Power Up!!
magibeg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 14, 2007, 04:57 AM   #22
kwchang007
2000 Posts
 
kwchang007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Severn, MD, USA.
Posts: 2,949 (1.28/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 189 Times in 185 Posts
Send a message via AIM to kwchang007

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weer View Post
Are you kidding?
First, off it's NOT a new architecture.
Secondly, the cache would get you like 1-5% more performance.
Thirdly, the world records were done at 5.5Ghz.
Fourthly, you know nothing about this.. but I'm not trying to be rude.

And yes, my Kentsfield will KILL ANY Yorkfield at stock.
First, it's a tweaked version of current Core 2s
Second, cache is huge when you're talking about large multi-threaded processes, especially in the Intel architecture.
Third, what's your point? Your q6600 is overclocked, why not compare it to the max overclock of a qx9770.

The 9770 will def have a unlocked multi (well if current extreme versions point to anything) which will make it easier to overclock. Also, the fact the at 45nm, they produce less heat so therefore can overclock higher will mean your 4.0 will be eaten by like a 4.2 or higher. The list goes on and on, but the point is the q6600 is in no ways superior to the qx9770
__________________
Power User
Teenager Club
Laptop Overclocking club


Thanks button....hit it if someone helped you, not a difficult concept really.

[img disabled]http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?t=1&uid=8351&iehack=.jpg[/img]
kwchang007 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 14, 2007, 06:40 AM   #23
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.49/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Ummm, what's the difference between E8190 and E8200? All the specs are identical.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 14, 2007, 02:14 PM   #24
kwchang007
2000 Posts
 
kwchang007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Severn, MD, USA.
Posts: 2,949 (1.28/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 189 Times in 185 Posts
Send a message via AIM to kwchang007

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wile E View Post
Ummm, what's the difference between E8190 and E8200? All the specs are identical.
Typo probably....look they have a e6550 and a e6540....same thing.
__________________
Power User
Teenager Club
Laptop Overclocking club


Thanks button....hit it if someone helped you, not a difficult concept really.

[img disabled]http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?t=1&uid=8351&iehack=.jpg[/img]
kwchang007 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 14, 2007, 11:40 PM   #25
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,021 (6.43/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,753 Times in 2,222 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weer View Post
Are you kidding?
First, off it's NOT a new architecture.
Secondly, the cache would get you like 1-5% more performance.
Thirdly, the world records were done at 5.5Ghz.
Fourthly, you know nothing about this.. but I'm not trying to be rude.

And yes, my Kentsfield will KILL ANY Yorkfield at stock.



ok this is just funny its like me saying my A64 will beat ANY P4 @ stock its just stupid lets compare apples and oranges while were at it...also the tweaking will be minuit but if other intel die shrinks say anything it will oc like a whole new beast expect 7ghz on these new C2D and 6.5ghz on the C2Quads...cache well it would be nice if intel would replace the damn FSB already so they didnt have to use these retardedly big and bulky cache sizes which limit the ENTIRE oc....finally you honestly dont know SHIT FROM GOLD SO STOP MAKING BLANKET STATEMENTS THAT YOU DONT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts