![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
|
Intel Processor and Pricing Chart for Early 2008
X-bit labs has prepared a nice chart illustrating all the information available for future Intel chips including pricing of the Intel 45nm Yorkfield CPUs and info on Intel's goliath - Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770. The story also indicates that after the introduction of the new 45nm CPUs in January, 2008, Intel will not cut prices of its existing Intel Core 2 Quad processors below $266.
![]() Source: X-bit labs |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 949 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 136
Thanked 35 Times in 23 Posts
|
juuuicy !!!!
I AM LOOKIN AT THE Q9550 2.83GHZ FOR $530 MMMM MMMM ! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Staff
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine
Posts: 4,279 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 411
Thanked 480 Times in 428 Posts
|
ok now AMD your turn to strike back
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: May 2006
Location: TX, USA
Posts: 6,464 (2.54/day)
Thanks: 292
Thanked 790 Times in 706 Posts
|
I think im going with the Q9450
any news on what multiplier they have ?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Sold my stars!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,650 (3.12/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 1,227 Times in 1,036 Posts
|
q6600 only 40 bucks more then the e6600 wtf...
__________________
![]() Need any Graphics Made? Visit Graphic Artists United! R.I.P Megan--Heaven has a new angel |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts
|
Quote:
1066Mhz QP = 266Mhz and 1333Mhz QP = 333Mhz. The Q9450 (which would be my choice as well, 12MB and cheap) is 8 x 333Mhz = 2.66Ghz. At 400Mhz that's 3.2Ghz, or in other words a QX9770 for a quarter of the price. Hopefully they're easy to overclock. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 65 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
q9550 has 8,5 multiplier. hmm
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Maximum Overclocker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12,236 (5.16/day)
Thanks: 2,054
Thanked 2,039 Times in 1,549 Posts
|
The prices of current processors aren't dropping?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New York / Israel
Posts: 1,293 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 60
Thanked 95 Times in 73 Posts
|
It's funny you call the QX9770 "Goliath".
Because it is defeated by my "David" - Q6600 @ 3.8Ghz (4.0Ghz possible). Ironic, isn't it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2,650 (1.25/day)
Thanks: 80
Thanked 217 Times in 160 Posts
|
wel it may have a higher overclock then the q6600?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() Don't get me wrong, but after only one run from QX9550, 11 world records were broken into pieces...you're going nowhere with your Q6600.
__________________
techPоwerUp! Last edited by malware; Oct 13, 2007 at 08:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() |
Ohh, at this rate we'll eliminate ram and just run everything from cache, while ram acts as the slow page file :P
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 717 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 50
Thanked 65 Times in 51 Posts
|
Phenom : T-Minus 1+ months and counting!
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() [SOVEREIGN'S uATX HTPC : OPTERON 1216 @ 2.8Ghz] [CURRENT STABLE OC : 3.0Ghz & 2GB MEM] [POWERED BY : AMD/ATI | CRUCIAL | nVIDIA™] PCs are a lot like air conditioners - they both work great until you open up windows! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Bird of Prey
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.99/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
|
that E8800 (or whatever it is) for 266 looks very nice. Intel has finally got it with the prices, took them long enough Id say.
__________________
=-TheEagle-= ![]() http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454 “You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120 - Edited for content and clarity
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() |
Damn. The future is looking good
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New York / Israel
Posts: 1,293 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 60
Thanked 95 Times in 73 Posts
|
Quote:
First, off it's NOT a new architecture. Secondly, the cache would get you like 1-5% more performance. Thirdly, the world records were done at 5.5Ghz. Fourthly, you know nothing about this.. but I'm not trying to be rude. And yes, my Kentsfield will KILL ANY Yorkfield at stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Oakham, UK
Posts: 2,035 (0.93/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 83 Times in 81 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia, Sydney
Posts: 5,023 (2.07/day)
Thanks: 412
Thanked 361 Times in 266 Posts
|
Quote:
"Same architecture" Oh right, you're an intel CPU engineer now? OF COURSE NOT. Intel obviously has changed the CPU's architecture, example, longer pipelineing, etc. They arent ignorant, and by logic the new QX9xxx/E9xxx series will be faster at the same clockspeed. Even if your Q6600 can do 4.0Ghz...Do we care? This isnt the overclocking thread, this is the front page news.
__________________
AMD Radeon X1950~HD4000 Support Clubhouse “Mac: "Woah, what are you doing?" Mac says as he levitates in the air.
PC: "Playing Half-Life 2, this is my gravity gun."
Mac: "Well I can sort of do that."
PC: "Technically Mac, you have to become me first."” -From_Nowhere
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SAN ANTONE, TX
Posts: 393 (0.16/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
my e6600 looks like a 286 compared to that QX9770...
__________________
new rig! my laptop pwns your pc well most of your pc'sASUS c90s barebone 15.4in WSXGA+ - Intel Core2Duo E6600 Conroe - Nvidia 8600gt 512mb - Corsair 2gb DDR2 RAM - Hitachi 80gb 7200rpm - Intel wireless a/b/g/N and bluetooth 2.0 - VISTA Ultimate madness?
THIS IS TECHPOWERUP!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() |
If your e6600 is a 286 then my p4 has the power of a dot matrix printer :P
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Severn, MD, USA.
Posts: 2,949 (1.28/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 189 Times in 185 Posts
|
Quote:
Second, cache is huge when you're talking about large multi-threaded processes, especially in the Intel architecture. Third, what's your point? Your q6600 is overclocked, why not compare it to the max overclock of a qx9770. The 9770 will def have a unlocked multi (well if current extreme versions point to anything) which will make it easier to overclock. Also, the fact the at 45nm, they produce less heat so therefore can overclock higher will mean your 4.0 will be eaten by like a 4.2 or higher. The list goes on and on, but the point is the q6600 is in no ways superior to the qx9770
__________________
Power User Teenager Club Laptop Overclocking club Thanks button....hit it if someone helped you, not a difficult concept really. [img disabled]http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?t=1&uid=8351&iehack=.jpg[/img] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Power User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.49/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
|
Ummm, what's the difference between E8190 and E8200? All the specs are identical.
__________________
![]() Visit Ashentech “What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Severn, MD, USA.
Posts: 2,949 (1.28/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 189 Times in 185 Posts
|
Typo probably....look they have a e6550 and a e6540....same thing.
__________________
Power User Teenager Club Laptop Overclocking club Thanks button....hit it if someone helped you, not a difficult concept really. [img disabled]http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?t=1&uid=8351&iehack=.jpg[/img] |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
where the hell are my stars
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,021 (6.43/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,753 Times in 2,222 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ok this is just funny its like me saying my A64 will beat ANY P4 @ stock its just stupid lets compare apples and oranges while were at it...also the tweaking will be minuit but if other intel die shrinks say anything it will oc like a whole new beast expect 7ghz on these new C2D and 6.5ghz on the C2Quads...cache well it would be nice if intel would replace the damn FSB already so they didnt have to use these retardedly big and bulky cache sizes which limit the ENTIRE oc....finally you honestly dont know SHIT FROM GOLD SO STOP MAKING BLANKET STATEMENTS THAT YOU DONT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|