![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
McLovin
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: My house.
Posts: 6,280 (2.35/day)
Thanks: 105
Thanked 340 Times in 246 Posts
|
Firefox 3.0 Beta 1 Memory Usage Tested
Ever since Firefox 3.0 Beta 1 was released to the public, people have been wondering whether or not memory usage was any better. An independent tester decided to take it upon himself to investigate. Running a Windows Vista Home Premium system with 2GB of RAM that had never had Firefox installed on it before, the man put each browser under three different testing scenarios (that were equivalent between the two systems). First, he loaded five web pages into the browser. Then, he loaded a single page and let the browser idle for 10 minutes. Finally, he loaded 12 pages and waited five minutes. The results are very interesting.
Firefox 2.0.0.9 used 35,640KB of RAM on the first test, 47,852KB on the second test, and a staggering 103,180KB on the last test. Firefox 3.0 Beta 1 at first did not seem to be doing much better, using 38,644KB and 63,764KB of RAM on the first and second tests, respectively. However, on the final test, Firefox 3.0 Beta 1 required only 62,312KB, over 40,000KB less than what Firefox 2.0.0.9 required. For comparison, Internet Explorer 7 used 89,756KB on the final test. Please check out the source link for screenshots and more detailed test results. Source: ZDNet |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 5,081 (2.49/day)
Thanks: 451
Thanked 640 Times in 526 Posts
|
From version 2.0.0.9, I had 178,xxxK of Ram usage before I made the switch. That was with all my extensions added in as well. I had 9 extensions and two themes installed. When I went to FF Beta 3, my memory usage dropped drastically. To about 45 or 60K. (I cant recall exactly what off hand atm) Still pretty damn good. Then again, all of my extensions and themes arent FF3.0 ready yet. So Ill have to wait and see.
__________________
Raid Arrays Explained Wanna look up your BSOD code? Heatware under CrAsHnBuRnXp http://crashtown.myminicity.com/ind CrAsHnBuRnXP's For Sale Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Bird of Prey
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.99/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
|
I had well over 130k usage on firefox 2.0.0.9 myself. Ive noticed a dramatic decreases in the newest beta release.
__________________
=-TheEagle-= ![]() http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454 “You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120 - Edited for content and clarity
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,773 (1.14/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 382 Times in 302 Posts
|
This is good news, I have a constant use of test three, but replace that 5min with 5 hours or more. Currently 9 tabs open with 282,648KB mem usage, can't wait for 3.0 to go final. Nothing wrong with 2.0.0.9 besides memory usage, so I'm not in hurry to be a beta tester
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Doctor Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts
|
i've had over 400MB of ram used before, 20 odd tabs open (i dont restart this PC, i only sleep it sometimes)
__________________
![]() Edumacational thread about PC Audio My external HDD's.5x samsung 1TB + 2x Seagate 1.5TB = 8 TB external storage 32 Bit OS vs 64 bit OS information How to get hardware accelerated H264 playback (DXVA) Netbook Owners United! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|