techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Dec 3, 2007, 05:51 AM   #1
malware
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.73/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to malware Send a message via MSN to malware Send a message via Skype™ to malware

System Specs

Samsung Develops GDDR5 Memory at 6Gbps

Samsung Electronics has announced that it has developed the world's fastest memory, a GDDR5 (series five, graphics double-data-rate memory) chip that can transfer data at six gigabits per second (Gbps). Samsung's GDDR5, which will be introduced at a density of 512 Mb (16Mb x 32) chips, is capable of transmitting moving images and associated data at 24 gigabytes per second (GBps). The new Samsung graphics memory operates at 1.5 volts, representing an approximate 20% improvement in power consumption over today's most popular graphics chip, the GDDR3. Samples of Samsung's new GDDR5 chip have been delivered to major graphic processor companies last month and mass production is expected in the first half of 2008. Samsung expects that GDDR5 memory chips will become standard in the top performing segment of the market by capturing more than 50% of the high-end PC graphics market by 2010.



Source: DigiTimes
malware is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 05:59 AM   #2
GLD
500 Posts
 
GLD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 954 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 119 Times in 69 Posts

System Specs

Damnit! I am still on DDR1.
GLD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 06:00 AM   #3
wazzledoozle
3500 Posts
 
wazzledoozle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,316 (1.35/day)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 166 Times in 89 Posts
Send a message via AIM to wazzledoozle Send a message via MSN to wazzledoozle

System Specs

That's a tremendous amount of bandwidth.
__________________
bellybuttons are great holes, their single purpose is to suck up pinkys
-DanTheBanjoman
wazzledoozle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 06:02 AM   #4
KennyT772
2000 Posts
 
KennyT772's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,933 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 103 Times in 98 Posts

System Specs

My god...Who wants to bet ATI will be all over this?
__________________
Xfire Heatware
KennyT772 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 06:22 AM   #5
OnBoard
2000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,773 (1.13/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 382 Times in 302 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by GLD View Post
Damnit! I am still on DDR1.
Actually you are not, this is graphics memory and you are using GDDR4 I'm still on 3 and even after next GPU upgrade I'll be on it.
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 06:33 AM   #6
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.11/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,526 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

It looks like this will require a powerful GPU in order to take full advantage of the bandwidth.
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 06:41 AM   #7
a111087
2000 Posts
 
a111087's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: US
Posts: 2,521 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 190 Times in 157 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by GLD View Post
Damnit! I am still on DDR1.
lol, you are fine, it's not Gddr, not ddr
and i also think that not every GPU will be able to really take an advantage of this memory
__________________
a111087 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 06:42 AM   #8
a111087
2000 Posts
 
a111087's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: US
Posts: 2,521 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 190 Times in 157 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyT772 View Post
My god...Who wants to bet ATI will be all over this?
+1
__________________
a111087 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 06:48 AM   #9
jocksteeluk
1000 Posts
 
jocksteeluk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The 13th room on the 13th floor of the 13th building.
Posts: 1,427 (0.53/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 48 Times in 39 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyT772 View Post
My god...Who wants to bet ATI will be all over this?
i doubt it, with AMD struggling on component pricing and Samsung wanting to drive ram prices up i cannot see anyone rushing to implement this technology at a premium just yet.
__________________
XXXI III MCMLXXXII
jocksteeluk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 07:09 AM   #10
robodude666
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 133 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 20 Times in 14 Posts

System Specs

Can't wait to see how well these will work

Think its possible that someone will use these for a SSD drive, even though they are meant as graphics memory? 6Gbps is a hella lot of speed!
robodude666 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 09:10 AM   #11
Ketxxx
Eligible for custom title
 
Ketxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kingdom of gods
Posts: 6,380 (2.42/day)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 580 Times in 412 Posts

System Specs

At last, maybe GDDR2 will now finally drop off the fact of the earth. I mean my god, wtf were they thinking with GDDR2? It ran hotter, slower even with its massively faster clock speeds, and was only capable of a 128bit memory bus. I hope whoever had the idea of "improving" GDDR with GDDR2 got fired.
__________________
WARNING: I am cracking down on stupidity in the forums. Anyone caught making a dumb statement clearly not knowing many, if any of the facts, will promptly be directed to xtremesystems.

Sig edited. If anyone wants to know about the E4400 (E7200 sold) drop me a PM
Ketxxx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 09:23 AM   #12
Random Murderer
3500 Posts
 
Random Murderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida, where it's hot as hell.
Posts: 4,096 (1.73/day)
Thanks: 1,007
Thanked 678 Times in 508 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ketxxx View Post
I hope whoever had the idea of "improving" GDDR with GDDR2 got fired.
lol, he died when a gddr2 chip exploded and hit him in the eye
__________________
“People just need a reason to live. Some peoples reason is to bitch on the Internet. W1zz is just giving these sad souls a reason to live. Hes like a saint. Saint W1zzard.” -TheMailMan78
Mars: Apparently I have been there before, but I don't recall.
Not all who wander are lost...
Random Murderer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 09:27 AM   #13
Ketxxx
Eligible for custom title
 
Ketxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kingdom of gods
Posts: 6,380 (2.42/day)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 580 Times in 412 Posts

System Specs

Haha, I hope that actually happened
__________________
WARNING: I am cracking down on stupidity in the forums. Anyone caught making a dumb statement clearly not knowing many, if any of the facts, will promptly be directed to xtremesystems.

Sig edited. If anyone wants to know about the E4400 (E7200 sold) drop me a PM
Ketxxx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 10:07 AM   #14
craigwhiteside
500 Posts
 
craigwhiteside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK, Liverpool
Posts: 926 (0.46/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
Send a message via MSN to craigwhiteside

System Specs

guess that may be going into the 8950's
__________________
WoOp WoOp!

Overclocked Gamers
craigwhiteside is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 12:17 PM   #15
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

If GDDR(x) is faster and more power efficient than regular DDR(x) then why doesnt the industry move over to GDDR(x) for system memory. Obviously, its more expensive, but with SO MANY enthusiast mobos and components, then surely this is what we need to BREAK the benchmarks.
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 12:23 PM   #16
Random Murderer
3500 Posts
 
Random Murderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida, where it's hot as hell.
Posts: 4,096 (1.73/day)
Thanks: 1,007
Thanked 678 Times in 508 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemonadesoda View Post
If GDDR(x) is faster and more power efficient than regular DDR(x) then why doesnt the industry move over to GDDR(x) for system memory. Obviously, its more expensive, but with SO MANY enthusiast mobos and components, then surely this is what we need to BREAK the benchmarks.
because the architecture is too different.
__________________
“People just need a reason to live. Some peoples reason is to bitch on the Internet. W1zz is just giving these sad souls a reason to live. Hes like a saint. Saint W1zzard.” -TheMailMan78
Mars: Apparently I have been there before, but I don't recall.
Not all who wander are lost...
Random Murderer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 12:41 PM   #17
Scrizz
2000 Posts
 
Scrizz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brandon, FL, US
Posts: 2,129 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 728
Thanked 292 Times in 267 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Scrizz

System Specs

Holy S***! GDDR5. I can't wait till GDDR6.
wow
__________________
~Scrizz Protected, Mother Approved~
Scrizz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 12:48 PM   #18
tigger
I'm the only one
 
tigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HU5 1LL
Posts: 7,214 (2.75/day)
Thanks: 474
Thanked 951 Times in 780 Posts
Send a message via MSN to tigger

System Specs

I think these will get bought for ati/nvidia to use on their flagship graphics cards tho' at least.
tigger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 04:36 PM   #19
effmaster
1000 Posts
 
effmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rocket City, Alabama (Huntsville)
Posts: 1,013 (0.48/day)
Thanks: 91
Thanked 78 Times in 37 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to effmaster

System Specs

You know this will be implemented by ATI ASAP just like they did with the X1950's XTX's with the GDDR4 memory to compete with the then just about to release Nvidea 8800's
__________________
“i'd wear tpu panties.” -Random Murderer
“Good to see that you have your issue resolved!!Can I have 700 dollars?” -3991vhtes
Mussels i only pissed on the electric fence after i was told not to - DONT DO THAT.)
Musselsif erotic thoughts made me have seizures, i'd stop looking at porn
How to clean your toilet: http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=40450
effmaster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 05:05 PM   #20
hacker111
200 Posts
 
hacker111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MA United States
Posts: 332 (0.16/day)
Thanks: 48
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

WOW 6gbps???
hacker111 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 06:23 PM   #21
Random Murderer
3500 Posts
 
Random Murderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida, where it's hot as hell.
Posts: 4,096 (1.73/day)
Thanks: 1,007
Thanked 678 Times in 508 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by effmaster View Post
You know this will be implemented by ATI ASAP just like they did with the X1950's XTX's with the GDDR4 memory to compete with the then just about to release Nvidea 8800's
um, gddr4 was implemented quickly by ati because they created it.
__________________
“People just need a reason to live. Some peoples reason is to bitch on the Internet. W1zz is just giving these sad souls a reason to live. Hes like a saint. Saint W1zzard.” -TheMailMan78
Mars: Apparently I have been there before, but I don't recall.
Not all who wander are lost...
Random Murderer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 06:42 PM   #22
tigger
I'm the only one
 
tigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HU5 1LL
Posts: 7,214 (2.75/day)
Thanks: 474
Thanked 951 Times in 780 Posts
Send a message via MSN to tigger

System Specs

How does the jump to each consecutive form of graphics ram work then? Is it a smaller process,or differant chips or method of addresing the ram.I kinda understand with system ram.
tigger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 06:54 PM   #23
Random Murderer
3500 Posts
 
Random Murderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida, where it's hot as hell.
Posts: 4,096 (1.73/day)
Thanks: 1,007
Thanked 678 Times in 508 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tigger69 View Post
How does the jump to each consecutive form of graphics ram work then? Is it a smaller process,or differant chips or method of addresing the ram.I kinda understand with system ram.
well, gddr4 isn't really a big enough improvement over gddr3 to warrant a new name, but ati uses weird marketing it's really more like gddr3.5.
the new name denotes architecture type.
there was never gddr1, because graphics cards actually used ddr system ram chips. gddr2 is specialized ddr2 system memory, and gddr3 was actually a completely new architecture. gddr4 was optimized gddr3, and gddr5 is ddr3 system memory that has been shrunk to reduce power usage but still allow high frequencies and throughput.
__________________
“People just need a reason to live. Some peoples reason is to bitch on the Internet. W1zz is just giving these sad souls a reason to live. Hes like a saint. Saint W1zzard.” -TheMailMan78
Mars: Apparently I have been there before, but I don't recall.
Not all who wander are lost...
Random Murderer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 07:33 PM   #24
Ketxxx
Eligible for custom title
 
Ketxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kingdom of gods
Posts: 6,380 (2.42/day)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 580 Times in 412 Posts

System Specs

There is no such terme as GDDR perse, the "G" simply denotes "Graphics", and thus, makes it easier for people to differentiate between system and graphics memory. If it were me, I'd just use the term I invented to differentiate between system and graphics memory - VidRAM, just makes more sence to me.
__________________
WARNING: I am cracking down on stupidity in the forums. Anyone caught making a dumb statement clearly not knowing many, if any of the facts, will promptly be directed to xtremesystems.

Sig edited. If anyone wants to know about the E4400 (E7200 sold) drop me a PM
Ketxxx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2007, 07:52 PM   #25
happita
2000 Posts
 
happita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: East Coast, USA
Posts: 2,046 (0.97/day)
Thanks: 210
Thanked 304 Times in 246 Posts

System Specs

This just gives me the giddies, lesser power consumption. Might make more efficient vid cards with these bad boys. Implement these into the next-gen cards and I think I'll be set for a LOOOOOONG time
__________________
co5 is cal i

htpc: work in progress..

HeatWare - http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=71725
happita is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts