techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Dec 7, 2007, 03:47 PM   #1
Jimmy 2004
Eligible for custom title
 
Jimmy 2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: England
Posts: 5,047 (1.65/day)
Thanks: 134
Thanked 276 Times in 185 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Jimmy 2004

System Specs

Yorkfield Launch Delayed

AMD hasn’t seen the launch of its Phenom processors go as smoothly as it had hoped after the early batches of processors were found to feature an erratum that lead to problems such as system instability and data loss, but now it’s Intel turn to solve a few problems. The chip-giant looks set to delay the launch of its upcoming 45nm Yorkfield CPUs because the integrity of the FSB frequency is not satisfactory and may even cause crashes. This shouldn’t be a major setback as it has only occurred when forced in a lab rather than in normal everyday computing, but it is likely to add at least a few weeks delay before the Yorkfields become available. The Wolfdale cores are unaffected by this and still on-target for a January release.

Source: NordicHardware
Jimmy 2004 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jimmy 2004 For This Useful Post:
Old Dec 7, 2007, 04:10 PM   #2
Silverel
1000 Posts
 
Silverel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,596 (0.79/day)
Thanks: 93
Thanked 237 Times in 217 Posts

System Specs

The ever compassionate Intel seeks to alleviate the bleeding of AMD.

"Hey look, we screwed up too! Kinda... well... a little."
*smashes chip with a hammer*
"Looks like an fsb problem."
Silverel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2007, 04:14 PM   #3
hacker111
200 Posts
 
hacker111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MA United States
Posts: 332 (0.16/day)
Thanks: 48
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

They seriously need to fix the FSB frequency or there screwed...and they need to fix it fast...
hacker111 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2007, 04:16 PM   #4
Chewy
2000 Posts
 
Chewy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Halifax, Canada
Posts: 2,616 (1.04/day)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 151 Times in 140 Posts

System Specs

screwed! damm intel is kicking ass :P Im perfectly happy with my 65nm c2d's.


Edit: ah I see your being sarcastic, go figure :P
__________________
BUGABUGABUGABUGAAAAA!

From_Nowhere's perspective on Jerry Seinfeld and Bill Gates Promoting Windows Vista.
“Mac: "Woah, what are you doing?" Mac says as he levitates in the air. PC: "Playing Half-Life 2, this is my gravity gun." Mac: "Well I can sort of do that." PC: "Technically Mac, you have to become me first."” -From_Nowhere
Chewy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2007, 04:17 PM   #5
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,753 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,116 Times in 3,707 Posts

System Specs

At least they caught it before the chips were released.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2007, 04:20 PM   #6
Chewy
2000 Posts
 
Chewy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Halifax, Canada
Posts: 2,616 (1.04/day)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 151 Times in 140 Posts

System Specs

^^ ohnoes. but your right, maybe Amd was in to much of a rush while intel can lay back and take thier time perfecting
__________________
BUGABUGABUGABUGAAAAA!

From_Nowhere's perspective on Jerry Seinfeld and Bill Gates Promoting Windows Vista.
“Mac: "Woah, what are you doing?" Mac says as he levitates in the air. PC: "Playing Half-Life 2, this is my gravity gun." Mac: "Well I can sort of do that." PC: "Technically Mac, you have to become me first."” -From_Nowhere
Chewy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2007, 04:25 PM   #7
tigger
I'm the only one
 
tigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HU5 1LL
Posts: 7,205 (2.75/day)
Thanks: 473
Thanked 951 Times in 780 Posts
Send a message via MSN to tigger

System Specs

If your the company playing catch up,your always on the back foot.

Its worth waiting a little longer knowing how good these chips will be.
tigger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2007, 04:43 PM   #8
DanTheBanjoman
Señor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.58/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by hacker111 View Post
They seriously need to fix the FSB frequency or there screwed...and they need to fix it fast...
Indeed because they're already so far behind on AMD. Their current generation just doesn't cut it.

Seriously, I don't see any rush. In fact they've given AMD a lot of space in the past years and they're still not screwed, I doubt this will cause it.
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2007, 10:08 PM   #9
mandelore
2000 Posts
 
mandelore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK-small Village in a Valley Near Newcastle
Posts: 2,917 (1.18/day)
Thanks: 33
Thanked 152 Times in 127 Posts

System Specs

lol, whats a few weeks... gives us some more time to save up! good imo
__________________
[img disabled]http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b312/eve_images/hiqsig.jpg[/IMG]
“looks like an extremely mouldy donut with veins and arteries” -hat
“OCZ has exploded their inventory, and new DDR3 offerings seem to be dropping like bombs over baghdad . . .” -imperialreign
mandelore is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 8, 2007, 05:36 AM   #10
Completely Bonkers
2000 Posts
 
Completely Bonkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,415 (1.05/day)
Thanks: 582
Thanked 533 Times in 374 Posts

System Specs

INTEL should just release Yorkfield with a lower FSB and higher multipler (e.g. 800, 1066 or 1333). Then the other benefits of Y could be had, and it would be a suitable drop-in for existing mainboards.

They can always release the 1600 pumped FSB later.
__________________
... some things in life just drive you bonkers. Especially the rubbish you see in forum posts
Completely Bonkers is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 9, 2007, 08:18 PM   #11
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,025 (6.42/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,755 Times in 2,224 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Completely Bonkers View Post
INTEL should just release Yorkfield with a lower FSB and higher multipler (e.g. 800, 1066 or 1333). Then the other benefits of Y could be had, and it would be a suitable drop-in for existing mainboards.

They can always release the 1600 pumped FSB later.
u mean like this one?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819115034
__________________
cdawall is online now  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts