techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > General Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 23, 2008, 10:50 PM   #1
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

PCIe 1.0a to PCIe 2.0 Performance reviewed

Conclusion
Quote:
Putting current graphics cards in a PCI Express x4 slot verges on madness, incurring a performance hit of between 25 and 33 percent. Even if the motherboard in question were especially cheap, the card's price/performance ratio is affected immensely. When using an x8 connection, performance also decreases, albeit only by 7 to 8 percent.

Our switch to the X38 chipset for Crossfire tests was overdue. The dual x16 connections improve performance by 6 to 7.7 percent on average, while optimized games such as Call of Duty 4 run nearly 20 percent faster. Looking only at games and resolutions that show a tangible performance boost, we saw an improvement of 12 to 15 percent, on average.

Another thing we saw is that a dual x16 configuration is not as effective for Crossfire as a single x16 slot is for a single card. As mentioned above, a single card loses between 7 and 8 percent performance when operating in an x8 slot. Moving from an x8+x8 setup to an x16+x16 connection also only yielded a 7.7 percent frame rate increase - not the doubling we might have expected based on the single card results.

For now, the move from PCI Express 1.0a to 2.0 does not result in a performance increase with the current crop of graphics cards. Despite the fact that it doesn't feature the PCIe 2.0 interface, ATI's Radeon HD2900 XT gains two percent more performance, as do the HD3850 and HD3870, as well as Nvidia's Geforce 8800 GT. Such a small improvement could have many causes completely unrelated to the new interface, such as the newer chipset, slightly higher system memory frequency, or simply margin of error.

Whether or not upgrading to a P35 or X38 based motherboard is a worthwhile investment for a single-card system is a matter of personal preference. If you're building a new system from the ground up, we would recommend choosing an X38 board with dual x16 connections for a Crossfire setup. Upgrading a Crossfire system from an Intel 975X or P35 chipset to an X38 will only pay off if you play at resolutions of 1920x1200 or higher.
Source

Looks like there is some marginal gains going from a PCIe 1.0a to PCIe 2.0
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2008, 10:53 PM   #2
PVTCaboose1337
Graphical Hacker
 
PVTCaboose1337's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 7,478 (2.77/day)
Thanks: 798
Thanked 1,174 Times in 834 Posts

System Specs

Marginal... looks less than that... maybe later PCIE2.0 cards will be better.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
PVTCaboose1337 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2008, 10:53 PM   #3
Duxx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

Yah, i didnt expect anything to be amazing, however hopefully future cards will take more advantage of this and we can see a greater increase.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel QX6700 Quad Core D_o_S Reviews 14 Jan 8, 2007 06:15 AM
Sapphire Radeon X1300 XT W1zzard Reviews 9 Nov 1, 2006 07:12 PM
System Builder's Guide 2006 djbbenn Articles 37 Aug 25, 2006 02:47 AM
NVIDIA nForce 5 Preview Darksaber Reviews 6 May 23, 2006 11:54 PM
Best performance cooler? zAAm Graphics Cards 18 Apr 21, 2005 11:02 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts