![]() |
|
|
#26 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 451 (0.23/day)
Thanks: 120
Thanked 49 Times in 43 Posts
|
yeah, like i said, they have had to admit that imc is the way to go, after they badmouthed the idea when amd started using it.
it really should help intel get around the problems they been having like to little fsb bandwith for their high end chips due to the cores using the FSB to talk to eachother as well as the fsb moving all that other data.......really becomes like a freeway at rushhour :P |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 451 (0.23/day)
Thanks: 120
Thanked 49 Times in 43 Posts
|
specly the pentium-d, that netburst core is horribly banwith hungery, only thing they where good at was encoding media :/
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Sold my stars!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,650 (3.11/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 1,227 Times in 1,036 Posts
|
i gope intel gets caught and fined.. its obvious that intel is really doing this.. and its screwing over amd and hurting the customer and making the prices of intel processors higher as amd doesn't have all too much to compete with intel.
http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=13607 then intel pays dell money under the table and http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=52003
__________________
![]() Need any Graphics Made? Visit Graphic Artists United! R.I.P Megan--Heaven has a new angel |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sector ZZ₉ Plural Z Alpha
Posts: 4,001 (1.87/day)
Thanks: 272
Thanked 953 Times in 710 Posts
|
The whole Pentium 4 series is a pristine prime example of why we as consumers need to see AMD stay around. They ran hot (especially the Prescotts), the architecture was stagnant, and their biggest selling points were the absolute insane clock speeds of the core itself - which Intel only accomplished by jacking the ever loving crap out of the BUS multiplier - leaving you with a fast processor per a spec sheet, but being horribly hampered down by slow BUS speeds, leaving you with sub par performance that just looked really great on paper, and that's all the customer ever saw. We didn't see anything noteworthy from Intel until AMD struck back, and Intel responded by fumbling over itself by slapping two P4 cores together, instead of actually doing real R&D work. Anyhow, even if you're not an AMD fanboi, we should offer our support in this. Even to the consumer, it appears that Intel have played an iron fist over the years, and that we're all pretty sure they've been playing with a stacked deck, which just isn't right nor is it fair.
__________________
![]() <Guide: Understanding audio specifications and hardware> <X-Fi Support Syndicate> Hit me up on Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/imperialreign {THERE IS MADNESS TO MY METHODS}
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to imperialreign For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CPUMark scores | theonetruewill | Overclocking & Cooling | 306 | Dec 29, 2007 11:21 PM |
| Which AM2 CPU should I buy | DaMulta | General Hardware | 48 | Aug 15, 2007 03:50 PM |
| System Builder's Guide 2006 | djbbenn | Articles | 37 | Aug 25, 2006 02:47 AM |
| Thermaltake Tai-Chi | Urlyin | Reviews | 8 | Jun 24, 2006 02:51 AM |
| Silverstone Temjin TJ08 | Darksaber | Reviews | 0 | Jun 1, 2006 06:29 PM |