techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Storage

View Poll Results: Will any SATA cable work with SATA2 Hardware?
Yes. 24 92.31%
No, you need a SATA2 cable. 1 3.85%
It's more complicated than yes or no... 1 3.85%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 25, 2008, 12:29 AM   #1
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

SATA Cables

Do you need a SATA2 cable to run a SATA2 drive at SATA2 speed on a SATA2 motherboard, or will any SATA cable work? I see some branded as SATA2, and some only as SATA. Are there really any differences? Will using a SATA1 cable with a SATA2 drive have any negative effects like limiting file transfer speed?

Last edited by DanishDevil; Mar 25, 2008 at 12:41 AM.
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DanishDevil For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 25, 2008, 12:30 AM   #2
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,747 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts

System Specs

There is no difference, just like there is no difference between SATA and SATA2.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 12:33 AM   #3
panchoman
Sold my stars!
 
panchoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,650 (3.11/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 1,227 Times in 1,036 Posts

System Specs

WTF

sata [150]= 1.5 mbps transfer speed
sata2(also called sata 3.0) = 3.0 mbps transfer speed

i see a difference newtekie.

as for the cables, tis a good question.
__________________


Need any Graphics Made? Visit Graphic Artists United!
R.I.P Megan--Heaven has a new angel
panchoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 12:39 AM   #4
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

Actually, you're both wrong



From Wikipedia.

I should probably rephrase the question, though.

Will using a SATA1 cable with a SATA2 drive have any negative effects? Like limiting file transfer speed. Doesn't seem like it would from the numbers, since my drive is sustained at about half of SATA1's capability.
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 12:43 AM   #5
panchoman
Sold my stars!
 
panchoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,650 (3.11/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 1,227 Times in 1,036 Posts

System Specs

my bad, i need 1.5 gbps & 3.0 gbps and not mbps lol.

i think there might be a difference, just because a sata150 cable might not be built to withstand sata2 speeds.
__________________


Need any Graphics Made? Visit Graphic Artists United!
R.I.P Megan--Heaven has a new angel
panchoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 12:45 AM   #6
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

Yeah, but I don't think there are any drives out there that have over 150mb/s burst speeds. I mean shit, the Raptor's are still running off of Sata-150.
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 12:47 AM   #7
Nitro-Max
1000 Posts
 
Nitro-Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Great Yarmouth, United Kingdom.{East Anglian Coast}
Posts: 1,722 (0.70/day)
Thanks: 340
Thanked 249 Times in 222 Posts

System Specs

well i had a sata 2 mobo with sata 2 cable and sata 2 drive and most i got with hd tune benchmark was 75mb transfer peak so god knows were the rest went??
__________________

MY RIG
http://www.techpowerup.com/gallery/1346.html
Heatware
http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=66464

I hate people that take drugs... Customs Officers for example!!
Nitro-Max is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 12:51 AM   #8
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

Hard Drives aren't up to par with even SATA150 yet. It's just like 64-bit processing when it was released. It was future-proof but not needed or utilized yet.
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DanishDevil For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 25, 2008, 01:44 AM   #9
Nitro-Max
1000 Posts
 
Nitro-Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Great Yarmouth, United Kingdom.{East Anglian Coast}
Posts: 1,722 (0.70/day)
Thanks: 340
Thanked 249 Times in 222 Posts

System Specs

So its a bit like pci-express 2.0 wont get the use it deserves till future cards can use up pci-e 1.1 bandwidth.

i see thanks man.
__________________

MY RIG
http://www.techpowerup.com/gallery/1346.html
Heatware
http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=66464

I hate people that take drugs... Customs Officers for example!!
Nitro-Max is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 01:54 AM   #10
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,747 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by panchoman View Post
WTF

sata [150]= 1.5 mbps transfer speed
sata2(also called sata 3.0) = 3.0 mbps transfer speed

i see a difference newtekie.

as for the cables, tis a good question.
It is only a technical difference, not an actual difference. There is no actual speed difference between SATA 1.5Gb/s and SATA 3.0GB/s.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 01:56 AM   #11
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

It will be an actual difference once drives catch up to that speed.

Who voted that I need a SATA2 cable? EXPLAIN YOURSELF!
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 02:07 AM   #12
imperialreign
3500 Posts
 
imperialreign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sector ZZ₉ Plural Z Alpha
Posts: 4,001 (1.87/day)
Thanks: 272
Thanked 953 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanishDevil View Post
It will be an actual difference once drives catch up to that speed.

Who voted that I need a SATA2 cable? EXPLAIN YOURSELF!
someone just trying to mess with you . . . although, I do find it rather funny

I agree though, there's no difference in SATA cables to the best of my knowledge.

Nor are there any real world differences in speed, except for how it looks on paper. I have a SATA300 drive, and HD Tach, as well as SandraSoft and other's all show similar speeds to other 150 HDDs.

SATA-6 connections, though, I believe is supposed to truly be faster than 1.5 and 3.0 . . . if you're running a solid state disk.
__________________

<Guide: Understanding audio specifications and hardware> <X-Fi Support Syndicate>
Hit me up on Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/imperialreign
{THERE IS MADNESS TO MY METHODS}
imperialreign is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 02:11 AM   #13
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

Yeah an SSD would sustain higher speeds, but not a typical hard drive.

COME FORWARD YEE NAY-SAYER!
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 02:14 AM   #14
MKmods
Case Mod Guru
 
MKmods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nevada
Posts: 4,711 (2.47/day)
Thanks: 2,879
Thanked 1,766 Times in 1,364 Posts

System Specs

I have cut the cables apart to mod and they are the same (sata1 and 2)

The only difference I saw was most of the sata 2 cables had the metal lock tab.

PS: good thread DD.
__________________
Buy tin snips FIRST!
MKmods is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MKmods For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 25, 2008, 02:17 AM   #15
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

Yeah, I was looking for cheap UV SATA cables and wondered now that I have a SATA2 drive if the extra $4 a cable was worth it. Doesn't look like it.
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 02:33 AM   #16
imperialreign
3500 Posts
 
imperialreign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sector ZZ₉ Plural Z Alpha
Posts: 4,001 (1.87/day)
Thanks: 272
Thanked 953 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanishDevil View Post
Yeah, I was looking for cheap UV SATA cables and wondered now that I have a SATA2 drive if the extra $4 a cable was worth it. Doesn't look like it.
That $4 = $1.50 for the extra ink to print the 2; $.50 to the manufacturer for extra profit; $.50 to the advertisers to cover the additional power needed to display a 2 on screen
__________________

<Guide: Understanding audio specifications and hardware> <X-Fi Support Syndicate>
Hit me up on Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/imperialreign
{THERE IS MADNESS TO MY METHODS}
imperialreign is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to imperialreign For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 25, 2008, 02:34 AM   #17
MKmods
Case Mod Guru
 
MKmods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nevada
Posts: 4,711 (2.47/day)
Thanks: 2,879
Thanked 1,766 Times in 1,364 Posts

System Specs

lol, a marketeer is born...
__________________
Buy tin snips FIRST!
MKmods is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 02:37 AM   #18
imperialreign
3500 Posts
 
imperialreign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sector ZZ₉ Plural Z Alpha
Posts: 4,001 (1.87/day)
Thanks: 272
Thanked 953 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by MKmods View Post
lol, a marketeer is born...


y'know - when you see how sales and management in the automotive repair industry charge for stuff on a customers invoice . . . you realize that with a little ingenuity, any cost can be justified
__________________

<Guide: Understanding audio specifications and hardware> <X-Fi Support Syndicate>
Hit me up on Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/imperialreign
{THERE IS MADNESS TO MY METHODS}
imperialreign is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 11:51 AM   #19
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,747 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanishDevil View Post
It will be an actual difference once drives catch up to that speed.

Who voted that I need a SATA2 cable? EXPLAIN YOURSELF!
That was me, I'm sorry. I clicked on the wrong one. Ignore one vote for SATA2.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 12:02 PM   #20
rampage
500 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Port Fairy, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 801 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 90
Thanked 72 Times in 67 Posts

System Specs

i am most likely wrong here but i was under the impression that sata2 cables were the same as sata1 except there were just better quality cables (metal tabs as mentioned earlier and more flexiable, ect)

END RANT
__________________
Torrent - Zotac Nano 320gb Hdd, 4 Gb, 42' plasma"
rampage is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 12:30 PM   #21
Tau
500 Posts
 
Tau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 699 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 94 Times in 90 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanishDevil View Post
Actually, you're both wrong



From Wikipedia.

I should probably rephrase the question, though.

Will using a SATA1 cable with a SATA2 drive have any negative effects? Like limiting file transfer speed. Doesn't seem like it would from the numbers, since my drive is sustained at about half of SATA1's capability.
Cables are cables. Period, have used both in multiple setups and have seen NO speed increase/decrease (even with just changing the cable)

I would also take that chart with a grain of salt as the REAL speed for Sata drives is more in around the 70-90MB/s mark, the 150/s is the maximum burst speed the controller is capable of. same goes for the Sata2 drives.
__________________
Communist Rule.
Tau is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 12:37 PM   #22
ex_reven
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413 (1.39/day)
Thanks: 117
Thanked 181 Times in 166 Posts

System Specs

You need a sata 2 cable.
Otherwise your not leet and all your sata 2 toting friends will mock your technological demise. The cables should also be SLI and Vista certified.
ex_reven is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ex_reven For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 25, 2008, 12:45 PM   #23
Pinchy
3500 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 4,650 (1.80/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 360 Times in 344 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Pinchy

System Specs

I voted "It's more complicated than yes or no..."

Only because I could.

__________________
mATX rig: TT Lanbox Lite, GA-G33M-DS2R, q9300, 4GB G.Skill Pi PC8000, 2x640GB Samsung F1's in RAID 0, LG 20x DVD+/RW, HIS IceQ HD4670 512MB, Gigabyte G-Power PRO, TT 450W TR2 RX Modular PSU
HTPC: i-Cute iBox, GA-MA780GM-S2H, 4850e, 2GB G.Skill PC6400, 1x640GB WD SE16, Onboard HD3200, D-link XtremeN PCIe, Leadtek WinFast DVR3100 H Tuner, 450W Vantec PSU
Server: Custom made case, EPIA Mini-ITX mobo, 1GHz VIA, 1GB PC2700 SO-DIMM, 1TB WD, Gigabit PCI LAN card, 60W 12V AC adapter
Pinchy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 05:46 PM   #24
MKmods
Case Mod Guru
 
MKmods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nevada
Posts: 4,711 (2.47/day)
Thanks: 2,879
Thanked 1,766 Times in 1,364 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by rampage View Post
i am most likely wrong here but i was under the impression that sata2 cables were the same as sata1 except there were just better quality cables (metal tabs as mentioned earlier and more flexiable, ect)

END RANT
As to "Better", I say no (cheaper, yes). The tabs are cool, but the WD Secure Connect seems like a great idea to me.
http://www.wdc.com/en/products/wdsc50rcw.asp

I notice the newer cables are more stiff, and the ends are constantly breaking.
__________________
Buy tin snips FIRST!
MKmods is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2008, 07:03 PM   #25
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

The AC Ryan UV SATA cables are nice and flexible, but don't have the tabs. I've gotten SATA cables that weren't advertised as "SATA 2" cables that had the tabs in a motherboard box, so the tabs aren't particular to SATA 1 or 2, nor is flexibility.

I think it's pretty safe to say that any SATA cable's gonna work...

...that is unless all your friends' are SLI and Vista cert
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bad SATA cables? Lopez0101 General Hardware 9 Oct 22, 2007 01:40 PM
Cable Management Clubhouse [Guides, discussion] tkpenalty techPowerUp! Club Forum 17 Jun 12, 2007 09:27 AM
PQI introduces SATA based 64GB SSD Darksaber News 4 Jan 12, 2007 03:29 AM
Sata and overclocking Dreamer-1982 Overclocking & Cooling 11 Jun 28, 2006 11:17 PM
Seagate introduces 500GB SATA HDD Darksaber News 2 Jan 10, 2006 07:35 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts