techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Motherboards & Memory

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Apr 12, 2008, 12:41 AM   #1
OrbitzXT
1000 Posts
 
OrbitzXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,734 (0.77/day)
Thanks: 359
Thanked 61 Times in 56 Posts
Send a message via AIM to OrbitzXT

System Specs

RAM Frequency or Timings?

I admit I never really knew a ton about RAM. I just knew it was the thing that would either allow me to overclock more or would stop me from being able to, and that it should be stable to prevent BSOD's and other issues with stability. So I have 2 GB of 1066 MHZ RAM and am just looking to get my system to run at 7x400 for 2.8 GHz with the system in my specs. Which configuration gives the best performance?

A: Ram at stock settings, 1066 MHZ 5-5-5-15
B: Ram at 800 MHZ with tweaked timings whatever they can be lowered to
C: Ram at higher than 1066 MHZ with same or looser timings.

I read a rather detailed "bible" about RAM but it was lengthy and a bit confusing. If my FSB is at 400 MHz, does my RAM perform the same at 800 MHZ 5-5-5-15 vs 1066 5-5-5-15 or is the 1066 better?
OrbitzXT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12, 2008, 12:44 AM   #2
sneekypeet
Unpaid Babysitter
 
sneekypeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 19,008 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 3,036
Thanked 5,487 Times in 3,950 Posts

System Specs

It is really close....there isnt a whole lot of difference test wise IMHO between 800MHz 4-4-4-12 or 1066 5-5-5-15.
__________________
Hers: ASUS Maximus V Gene / i7 3770K / Swiftech H220 / 4X8GB Corsair Dominators / ASUS GTX660 / Corsair AX-760 / Windows 7 64bit / Fractal Design ARC Midi R2

Test: Gigabyte Z68X-UD4-B3 / i7 2600K / A lot Of Coolers / Ripjaws Currently / HIS HD7950 IceQ Turbo / Silverstone SST-ST85F-G / Windows 7 64bit / InWin D-Frame Limited Edition
sneekypeet is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12, 2008, 12:55 AM   #3
OrbitzXT
1000 Posts
 
OrbitzXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,734 (0.77/day)
Thanks: 359
Thanked 61 Times in 56 Posts
Send a message via AIM to OrbitzXT

System Specs

I'm toying around with different settings to see what is stable and what isn't. I have my FSB at 444 MHZ and a 2.4 divider. So now my E6550 is running at 444x7 3108 MHZ, after about 15 minutes of Prime 95 so far the temp is capping at 59C, which I think is decent considering I'm using an acrylic case with fan filters and a Zalman 9700 not set to max RPMs. The memory tab in CPU-Z says my timings are 5-7-7-24 2T, thats the only thing that doesn't seem right to me. I should probably set the timings myself in the bios? What are the right ones, 5-5-5-15 1T or 2T?
OrbitzXT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12, 2008, 12:59 AM   #4
sneekypeet
Unpaid Babysitter
 
sneekypeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 19,008 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 3,036
Thanked 5,487 Times in 3,950 Posts

System Specs

5-5-5-15 2t is best, find out where it stops OC'ing, then try to lower the latencies!
__________________
Hers: ASUS Maximus V Gene / i7 3770K / Swiftech H220 / 4X8GB Corsair Dominators / ASUS GTX660 / Corsair AX-760 / Windows 7 64bit / Fractal Design ARC Midi R2

Test: Gigabyte Z68X-UD4-B3 / i7 2600K / A lot Of Coolers / Ripjaws Currently / HIS HD7950 IceQ Turbo / Silverstone SST-ST85F-G / Windows 7 64bit / InWin D-Frame Limited Edition
sneekypeet is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12, 2008, 01:02 AM   #5
VroomBang
75 Posts
 
VroomBang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 163 (0.09/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

System Specs

according to a few tests I did with Super Pi, I got better scores with higher FSB and loser timings than lower FSB and tighter timings. I've been told by a guy here from Mushkin Support that the reason is because Intel Cpus like higher bandwith and don't depend so much on latency.
__________________
We want quantum processors now!
VroomBang is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12, 2008, 02:43 AM   #6
ntdouglas
1000 Posts
 
ntdouglas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,015 (0.44/day)
Thanks: 75
Thanked 44 Times in 43 Posts

System Specs

All you can do is change settings and bench. Just keep doing that and you will find the sweet spot.
ntdouglas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12, 2008, 03:03 AM   #7
OrbitzXT
1000 Posts
 
OrbitzXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,734 (0.77/day)
Thanks: 359
Thanked 61 Times in 56 Posts
Send a message via AIM to OrbitzXT

System Specs

I have it at 471x7 now for 3297 MHZ. Memory is running at 1130 MHZ 5-5-5-15, I've been using Super Pi as quick benches to see what performs best, so far this is the best I'm getting.
OrbitzXT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Maximus Formula, Det Dram hangs, PC8500 ram, NB voltage and YOU! EastCoasthandle Motherboards & Memory 74 Oct 31, 2008 09:52 PM
NVIDIA's shady trick to boost the GeForce 9600 GT W1zzard Reviews 174 May 21, 2008 01:58 PM
Tighten ram timings and latency *Increases* niko084 Overclocking & Cooling 19 Sep 22, 2007 08:22 PM
RAM Timings Nothgrin Motherboards & Memory 9 May 10, 2007 12:52 PM
Ram timings seem wrong?? 144 and UP Motherboards & Memory 5 Sep 17, 2006 03:12 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts