Post your 3dMark06 (and Vantage) HD 4K Series Results

[Chicken Patty]

Originally Posted by H82LUZ73

yours noticed it after the fact nice score .I will be getting the 9950 Phenom Be here in a few weeks with another 4870 in crossfire for my bench loving 3Dmark06.

you will be impressed, I was the happiest man alive at that moment.

[REVHEAD]

Here is mine on my 4ghz E8600 with Crossfire and 4.7 cats I get marked lower for not using a Quad, but I get higher peak and everage frames in the Gpu tests so go figure lol, oh and AOC playes better @ 4ghz duel core than it did for me with my q9450 @ 3.6.

I will sacrifice the 2 cores for higher mhz anyday.

[amit_talkin]

Originally Posted by Chicken Patty

Hey guys, this is not a 48xx series card, but i'm just hoping you guys can tell me what you think about my score. I used to get around 10k all the time with my athlon x2, felt like crap, I though the 2900xt was a POS. Now that I have the Phenom x4 this card is really shining. Just want to know what you guys think

well, thats nice score.
I m getting only 10xxx 3dmark06 score on HD 4850@725/1150 on E6300@3.01 GHz!!! its too low for me, donno wth happn with this card/

[Chicken Patty]

Originally Posted by amit_talkin

well, thats nice score.
I m getting only 10xxx 3dmark06 score on HD 4850@725/1150 on E6300@3.01 GHz!!! its too low for me, donno wth happn with this card/

Thanks bro, this has been my best run until date, its on my hwbot.org profile.
check it out


http://hwbot.org/user.do;jsessionid=...C?userId=16962

[Scrizz]

Originally Posted by amit_talkin

well, thats nice score.
I m getting only 10xxx 3dmark06 score on HD 4850@725/1150 on E6300@3.01 GHz!!! its too low for me, donno wth happn with this card/

sounds like there is something wrong with your setup. I get 12xxx at 680/1100 e4400@3.2.

[Chicken Patty]

amit, why dont you do a run, and when you see the score at the end click on details. THen it'll bring up your scores individually and you FPS in each test. Then you can post it here with a screenshot and compare it with others, maybe your CPU is not scoring what it should. or its just your card.

Hey SCrizz, what part of Florida are you in>

[Scrizz]

Originally Posted by Chicken Patty

Hey SCrizz, what part of Florida are you in>

The 813

[amit_talkin]

I had already posted a topic about this issue

http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=67305

I just opened my case yesterday to see wht wrong has gone with my card!! but found nothing....I parted out all parts from my case, cleaned up dust from them....reset BIOS, tested again...same result..

holy crap!! I just benchmarked on xp x64 edition, here is the score.




wtf happn to my card??????????????
or may be something with mobo? plz look at my rig in left table.

[Chicken Patty]

Originally Posted by amit_talkin

I had already posted a topic about this issue

http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=67305

I just opened my case yesterday to see wht wrong has gone with my card!! but found nothing....I parted out all parts from my case, cleaned up dust from them....reset BIOS, tested again...same result..

holy crap!! I just benchmarked on xp x64 edition, here is the score.




wtf happn to my card??????????????
or may be something with mobo? plz look at my rig in left table.

wow, your cpu score is super low. You sure all your settings in your bios are how they are supposed to be?

[amit_talkin]

CPU score is not bad I think, at this speed ppl get similar score ( I just checked on futuremark website for 3GHz c2d ). but sm2 and sm3 scores are shown very poor in my test.

i m using this system from past 2 years without any problem. I am aware of BIOS settings ( I have played with it too much to find problems )

[Chicken Patty]

Originally Posted by amit_talkin

CPU score is not bad I think, at this speed ppl get similar score ( I just checked on futuremark website for 3GHz c2d ). but sm2 and sm3 scores are shown very poor in my test.

i m using this system from past 2 years without any problem. I am aware of BIOS settings ( I have played with it too much to find problems )

I think its low, I dont remember what my buddy got, but he has a E6300 at 3.0GHz and with my 2900xt on stock clocks on air in his machine he did 106xx 3dmarks. My athlon x2 did about the same, and that I know off core 2 duo's are considerably faster.

Let me rephrase, its not super low, but I think it could be a bit higher. However now that i'm looking more at the cards, they are low too! I'm puzzled.

Try opening GPU-z and see what clocks it gives you. 4850's can definetely do better than that.

[Scrizz]

wow his cards are REALLY low

[Darknova]

Originally Posted by Chicken Patty

I think its low, I dont remember what my buddy got, but he has a E6300 at 3.0GHz and with my 2900xt on stock clocks on air in his machine he did 106xx 3dmarks. My athlon x2 did about the same, and that I know off core 2 duo's are considerably faster.

Let me rephrase, its not super low, but I think it could be a bit higher. However now that i'm looking more at the cards, they are low too! I'm puzzled.

Try opening GPU-z and see what clocks it gives you. 4850's can definetely do better than that.

No, It's super low, a 939 Athlon X2 at 4200 gets just over 2k on the CPU score...

What I would suggest for the time-being amit, is back your OC back to stock and run it again, just see what score you get then, it's entirely possible your overclock has become unstable.

[Chicken Patty]

^ yeah my athlon x2 got about that, and core 2 duos blow away athlon x2's

[Darknova]

Originally Posted by Chicken Patty

^ yeah my athlon x2 got about that, and core 2 duos blow away athlon x2's

I was wrong actually lol. At stock the CPU score is 1.6k, but OC'd to 2.8Ghz it got nearly 2k :P

[Chicken Patty]

Originally Posted by Darknova

I was wrong actually lol. At stock the CPU score is 1.6k, but OC'd to 2.8Ghz it got nearly 2k :P

I still think its low, Like I said maybe not super low but I think he can score a bit higher.


My buddy has the same processor, back when I was not on water, when I was still air cooled, I took my 2900xt over to his house, put it on, and got the drivers for it. at factory clocks, he hit 106xx 3dmarks. Thats like 1000 more than him, if I remember correctly his cpu score was higher too!!!. I'm going over there now, hes a member here, hopefully If I remember I'll tell him to run a 3dmark with his processor, maybe the score is just about right and i'm loosing my mind. He has a x1800 so his score shouldn't be too high, but at least just to see his CPU score.

By the way he has the same CPU, its a E6300 overclocked to 3.0GHz as well. Lets see, I'll try to post it at his house. Laterz.

[ghost101]

AriciU's results are both with crossfire. The massive disparity makes that obvious.

[ShadowFold]

CPU should be a 4ghz, 9.5x multi, speed step

Anyone think that score is low/high for my system?

[Darknova]

Originally Posted by ShadowFold

CPU should be a 4ghz, 9.5x multi, speed step

Anyone think that score is low/high for my system?

That's a good score I believe.

[wolf]

Originally Posted by ShadowFold

CPU should be a 4ghz, 9.5x multi, speed step

Anyone think that score is low/high for my system?

seems pretty spot on

[mYrAn]

Sooooo close to 20k

Single card:

[Chicken Patty]

Myran, wow those max temps on the CPU were up there. I wouldn't feel comfortable having my temps go that high. Great score though.

[mYrAn]

Originally Posted by Chicken Patty

Myran, wow those max temps on the CPU were up there. I wouldn't feel comfortable having my temps go that high. Great score though.

They're usually not that high, take a look at the vcore I was just trying once to try and get 20k, im under 55 load all the time when im at 4 ghz

[Chicken Patty]

Originally Posted by mYrAn

They're usually not that high, take a look at the vcore I was just trying once to try and get 20k, im under 55 load all the time when im at 4 ghz

What were you at there in that benchmark? CPU-Z says 2.8GHz, but I know you don't need that much voltage for that, and I also know CPU-Z gives information that is not true sometimes

[mYrAn]

Originally Posted by Chicken Patty

What were you at there in that benchmark? CPU-Z says 2.8GHz, but I know you don't need that much voltage for that, and I also know CPU-Z gives information that is not true sometimes

4,2 ghz, my cpu really needs alot of vcore to do that... Before i could run it fine @ ~1.4, now i need 1.5...