![]() |
|
|
#26 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,557 (1.44/day)
Thanks: 312
Thanked 533 Times in 435 Posts
|
That's why I said it doesn't matter if Phenom can run on older socket mobo. I'm not talking about OC headroom here. Don't piss on me.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,733 (0.91/day)
Thanks: 1,936
Thanked 618 Times in 507 Posts
|
You're very welcome, make sure you're up to it though as the thread is well over 100 pages.
![]() Forgive me all for sounding so 'rude' earlier I just can't stand misinformation because someone made a dumb decision without reading up on something. The product isn't a bad one, the decision to only buy half of it was. K |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,733 (0.91/day)
Thanks: 1,936
Thanked 618 Times in 507 Posts
|
Quote:
K Edit: OC'd specs go much higher than that into the 5000+Mhz range on the HT Link and Northbridge (extremely 100000000000000000000% important to the Phenom performance). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,557 (1.44/day)
Thanks: 312
Thanked 533 Times in 435 Posts
|
Run 3Dmark Vantage CPU test on your CPU at 2.4GHz, then I will trust you.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,733 (0.91/day)
Thanks: 1,936
Thanked 618 Times in 507 Posts
|
You should take a look at the thread too as nearly every benchmark made (including the ones that don't matter) has already been run. Take a peep at the thread and you'll see what your processor can really do if you buy it a new house.
![]() K |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,557 (1.44/day)
Thanks: 312
Thanked 533 Times in 435 Posts
|
That thread, If i remember right, it has over 50+ pages, which page should I check? =_=.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,733 (0.91/day)
Thanks: 1,936
Thanked 618 Times in 507 Posts
|
Hahahahahahaha..........it's actually nearly 150 pages now. Just start at the beginning a there is lots of info there. After that you can jump around all you want to ![]() K |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
WCG Team Captain
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 23,887 (11.95/day)
Thanks: 15,149
Thanked 12,309 Times in 7,775 Posts
|
Maybe i'm not understanding you guys, but how is it an older socket? Its still AM2+.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,733 (0.91/day)
Thanks: 1,936
Thanked 618 Times in 507 Posts
|
Chicken...he said M2N32 not M3A32 which is AM2+. The board he's talking about is the old school board for AM2 chips...
This http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131011 Not This http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131224 K |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,557 (1.44/day)
Thanks: 312
Thanked 533 Times in 435 Posts
|
I guess I will pass... that thread, Unless you edited your first post with info you gathered so far, or make a new thread about AM2 vs AM2+ on Phenom.
FYI, My CPU @ 2700 got ~8750 CPU score in 3DMark Vantage. And ~3600 in 3DMark 2006 CPU test. If you could direct me to a post #, or just a link, that showing moving to AM2+ socket will make different enough to notice then It will more than useful.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
WCG Team Captain
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 23,887 (11.95/day)
Thanks: 15,149
Thanked 12,309 Times in 7,775 Posts
|
Theres no point arguing as some people just don't understand. Anyhow, blueskynis you will enjoy the phenom tremendously. JUst make sure you get a board that is able to use the cpu to its full potential. Like Kei mentioned earlier, any 790fx mobo will do the trick. If you want you can even wait for the new boards with the SB750 to get better and purchase one of those, I could only imagine a phenom on one of those.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
WCG Team Captain
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 23,887 (11.95/day)
Thanks: 15,149
Thanked 12,309 Times in 7,775 Posts
|
Quote:
my cpu did a hair over 11000 in vantage, however I did not take a screen shot of that.(@ 3.1GHz) In 3dmark 06 it did 4839.(@3.3GHz) But like I said before, benchmarks are just benchmarks, that don't mean anything. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,733 (0.91/day)
Thanks: 1,936
Thanked 618 Times in 507 Posts
|
The benchmarks you're using to test against us are only valid if you test using the same system. Using different graphics cards or other hardware will make the test null and void. Choosing another benchmark will be much smarter such as Everest Ultimate (an entire slew of useful benchmarks).
K |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,557 (1.44/day)
Thanks: 312
Thanked 533 Times in 435 Posts
|
It's at 3.1GHz?
![]() Futuremark isn't there to laugh at. my system an AM2 mobo socket + Phenom at 2.7GHz, you 2 own 9850BE, downclock isn't a big problem, and both of you own AM2+ mobo, it fits the bill.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,733 (0.91/day)
Thanks: 1,936
Thanked 618 Times in 507 Posts
|
kid, can you take a screenshot of cpu-z or something so we know the exact setting you have on your pc right now including memory?
K |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
WCG Team Captain
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 23,887 (11.95/day)
Thanks: 15,149
Thanked 12,309 Times in 7,775 Posts
|
Well, run 3dmark at 3.1Ghz and lets see what your cpu can get. Doesn't seem much more for being at 3.1GHz, but its hard to make up that ground.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
WCG Team Captain
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 23,887 (11.95/day)
Thanks: 15,149
Thanked 12,309 Times in 7,775 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,557 (1.44/day)
Thanks: 312
Thanked 533 Times in 435 Posts
|
CPUz
CPU, Memory, Mainboard.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kid41212003 For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#44 |
|
WCG Team Captain
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 23,887 (11.95/day)
Thanks: 15,149
Thanked 12,309 Times in 7,775 Posts
|
you are running ddr2 800, correct?
Also is that the highest clock you can get stable, or thats just what you are running it at? |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,557 (1.44/day)
Thanks: 312
Thanked 533 Times in 435 Posts
|
Yes, It's 800, here are my old becnhmarks.
3DMark 2006 and Vantage. EDIT: I could get it to ~2800, system won't boot after FSB reach 236, even with NB voltage at 1.4v. System not stable at 2800, "interupted second processor" error.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
![]() |
Quote:
Gods are made through gaming, not 3Dmarks. And for all those that just want stats and 3dmarks...IE, you build systems just for benchmarking, then I got a great idea for you. Theres a game built all around stats and wasting time and money. Its called World of Warcraft. So go buy that, shut the hell up and jog on about your shitty choices on buying hardware components. On another note. I too own a 9850BE Phenom coupled with a 790FX motherboard and couldnt be happier. I dont even use my full system's power. I run my chip on only two cores rather then all four and dropped the speed to 2.3ghz. Its consuming .95v and rocks all my games just fine. I can also multitask like no other without skipping a beat. If you are looking to get a AMD product then look no further, my friend. This will satisfy any sensible person with an outlook on needs rather then uselessness. (I refer to those intel owners running 4ghz 24/7. Why?)
__________________
I've never been a fan of answers. Want to know why? Too bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,557 (1.44/day)
Thanks: 312
Thanked 533 Times in 435 Posts
|
Lols, did you try to read all the previous posts? We're talking about Phenom on AM2 vs AM2+, and the programs use to judge it are 3DMark CPU tests. No one trying to show E-penis here.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
![]() |
Do I need to quote you again?
__________________
I've never been a fan of answers. Want to know why? Too bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,557 (1.44/day)
Thanks: 312
Thanked 533 Times in 435 Posts
|
Yes, you do.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
![]() |
I'd rather not waste the time. Refer to post number 46 please.
And if you want to get better performance for the benchmark scores then hop on an 790gx board. Proven to help overclock the processor further then any other chipset for Phenoms.
__________________
I've never been a fan of answers. Want to know why? Too bad. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Build Thread | bruins004 | System Builder's Advice | 159 | Mar 5, 2013 10:53 AM |
| Klipsch Image Earphone | Frederik S | Reviews | 1 | Nov 29, 2008 03:54 AM |
| OVC TC20 Earphones | Frederik S | Reviews | 0 | Apr 10, 2008 03:59 PM |
| Vsonic Vs-r02pro | Frederik S | Reviews | 0 | Apr 5, 2008 11:26 AM |
| Mad cheap watercooling systems: too good to be true? | panchoman | Overclocking & Cooling | 5 | Jul 30, 2007 07:36 PM |