techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Graphics Cards > AMD / ATI

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 24, 2008, 01:55 PM   #1
stordoff
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 178 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts

System Specs

Poor 4870X2 Performance

Clean vista install - Catalyst 8.8 Drivers

Furmark has the same performance as a HD3850 ( http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=40981 )


3DMark06 run doesn't complete, black screen and reboots after the first test (Return to Proxycon)

Any one know what could be causing this?
stordoff is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 02:04 PM   #2
Lionheart
2000 Posts
 
Lionheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,416 (1.85/day)
Thanks: 2,484
Thanked 740 Times in 527 Posts

System Specs

hmmmm dont know much about benchmarking man, but you should defanetly overclock that CPU of yourse to gain more performance out of it, not for games but for benchmarking and everyday use, you would notice a big difference, but about the low scores, not quite sure, maybe your car is being bottlenecked but maybe someone else would, anyways goodluck finding how, later
Lionheart is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 02:09 PM   #3
stordoff
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 178 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts

System Specs

Yeh, I normally run the Q6600 at 3.0GHz, just reset everything to stock when I got my 4870X2. Doesn't explain the poor Furmark and 3DMark crashes though.

Found this result for comparision:
Furmark v1.4 Fullscreen
Score: 5846
FPS Min:87
FPS Max:132
FPS Avg:98
Time: 60000ms
Res: 1280x1024 / MSAA: 0x
Renderer: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
Active GPUs: 2
Drivers: 5.2.3790.1830 - Catalyst 0
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.4Ghz
CPU Speed: 2400MHz
stordoff is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 02:09 PM   #4
tomcug
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 98 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts

System Specs

You have to update your motherboard's BIOS to the latest one and install latest drivers. You should also overclock your CPU to about 3,2GHz.
tomcug is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 02:13 PM   #5
stordoff
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 178 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomcug View Post
You have to update your motherboard's BIOS to the latest one and install latest drivers. You should also overclock your CPU to about 3,2GHz.
Done, done and done. OC the CPU made no difference, drivers and the BIOS were already the latest. Thanks for the input though
stordoff is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 02:13 PM   #6
kid41212003
2000 Posts
 
kid41212003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,558 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 312
Thanked 533 Times in 435 Posts

System Specs

Did you know that Furmark test is OpenGL? Maybe drivers not optimized for OpenGL yet.
__________________
kid41212003 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 02:16 PM   #7
Lionheart
2000 Posts
 
Lionheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,416 (1.85/day)
Thanks: 2,484
Thanked 740 Times in 527 Posts

System Specs

futuremark, i bet nvidia bribed them to use their arcitecture
Lionheart is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 02:17 PM   #8
alexp999
Staff
 
alexp999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dorset, UK
Posts: 6,728 (3.16/day)
Thanks: 684
Thanked 915 Times in 783 Posts
Send a message via MSN to alexp999

System Specs

What temps are you getting during furmark and 3dmark? Sounds like it could be that, if everything is running stock
__________________

ASUS P45 Club [FS] [WTB] Heatware ebay
Elite Lounge USB Boot Guide 3DMark Vantage
My Rig XBOX Gamertag Steam ID
Dad's: EVGA 750i FTW, E6600, F7Pro, 4GB, 8800GTS 640MB SLi, SST 750W, Commodore EVE Gallente Case
alexp999 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 02:18 PM   #9
stordoff
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 178 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by kid41212003 View Post
Did you know that Furmark test is OpenGL? Maybe drivers not optimized for OpenGL yet.
The other result I posted was also on a 4870X2, yet I got half the score. Of a greater concern is crash in 3DMark06

Edit: Just checked the temps after five minutes of Furmark - 87 degrees C. Is this in the correct range for this card?

Any chance my PSU could be causing this? 12V rail is 12.15v idle, 12.18v whilst Furmark is running. (DMM) This doesn't seem to high, just checking

Last edited by stordoff; Aug 24, 2008 at 02:38 PM.
stordoff is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 05:53 PM   #10
boogah
500 Posts
 
boogah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 865 (0.48/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 146 Times in 140 Posts

System Specs

furmark doesn't do crossfire. Run something like 3dmark06 and vantage.
boogah is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 06:00 PM   #11
Fitseries3
Eleet Hardware Junkie
 
Fitseries3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,993 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 4,318
Thanked 3,285 Times in 2,186 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Fitseries3

System Specs

8.8 drivers sucks. use the 8.7
Fitseries3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 06:01 PM   #12
stordoff
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 178 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by boogah View Post
furmark doesn't do crossfire. Run something like 3dmark06 and vantage.
Even so, I get about half the score of someone else with a Q6600 and a 4870X2. 3DMark06 won't complete (reboots after first test)

Doesn't matter now, RMAing the card - it started artifacting in games

Quote:
Originally Posted by fitseries3 View Post
8.8 drivers sucks. use the 8.7
Tried both (and the one on the disk supplied), almost identical results
stordoff is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 06:03 PM   #13
kyle2020
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

sounds like it burnt itself to death. Hope the new card solves your problems!
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 06:05 PM   #14
tomcug
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 98 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts

System Specs

Man, get rid of those fucking Catalyst 8.8 drivers and install Catalyst 8.7 drivers. Using Catalyst 8.7 I've scored 6590 points, but when using Catalyst 8.8 drivers I've scored only 3490 points. AMD is hiding something for sure, because after changing filename to Fur.exe score went back to 6590 points. I'm pretty sure it has something to do with those unstable Power Color Radeon HD 4870 PCS+ cards. Check this out:
http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/sh....php?t=2057897
tomcug is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 06:11 PM   #15
stordoff
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 178 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomcug View Post
AMD is hiding something for sure, because after changing filename to Fur.exe score went back to 6590 points.[/URL]
Good catch - Changing the filename to F.exe gives me:

FurMark v1.4.0 Fullscreen Score.
[ SCORE: 5785 o3Marks ]
- FPS Min: 86
- FPS Max: 131
- FPS Avg: 97
- Time: 60000 ms
- Res: 1280x1024 / MSAA: 0X
- Renderer: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
- Active GPUs: 2
- Drivers: Unknown version
- CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
- CPU Speed: 2405 MHz
- OS: Windows Vista ver.6.0 build 6001 [Service Pack 1]

8.7 drivers didn't help though, pretty much the same as the 8.8. Still RMAing it due to the artifacting
stordoff is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 06:14 PM   #16
Fitseries3
Eleet Hardware Junkie
 
Fitseries3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,993 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 4,318
Thanked 3,285 Times in 2,186 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Fitseries3

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by stordoff View Post
Still RMAing it due to the artifacting
indiana jones enjoys finding artifacts.








this is weird that ATI/AMD seems to be hiding something in the drivers. didnt we catch nvidia doing this before?
Fitseries3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 06:16 PM   #17
kyle2020
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

Quote:
Originally Posted by fitseries3 View Post
this is weird that ATI/AMD seems to be hiding something in the drivers. didnt we catch nvidia doing this before?
care to explain?
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 06:20 PM   #18
Fitseries3
Eleet Hardware Junkie
 
Fitseries3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,993 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 4,318
Thanked 3,285 Times in 2,186 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Fitseries3

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle2020 View Post
care to explain?
there was a thing in a version of the nvidia drivers around the time that the 8800gt's came out that showed a HUGE difference in crysis when you renamed the driver to something else. it was here on TPU. im looking for it.
Fitseries3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 06:22 PM   #19
Fitseries3
Eleet Hardware Junkie
 
Fitseries3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,993 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 4,318
Thanked 3,285 Times in 2,186 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Fitseries3

System Specs

http://www.elitebastards.com/cms/ind...=487&Itemid=29
Fitseries3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 07:15 PM   #20
AsRock
TPU addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US\ Uk Born
Posts: 8,794 (4.07/day)
Thanks: 1,675
Thanked 1,348 Times in 1,170 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by stordoff View Post
The other result I posted was also on a 4870X2, yet I got half the score. Of a greater concern is crash in 3DMark06

Edit: Just checked the temps after five minutes of Furmark - 87 degrees C. Is this in the correct range for this card?

Any chance my PSU could be causing this? 12V rail is 12.15v idle, 12.18v whilst Furmark is running. (DMM) This doesn't seem to high, just checking

The temp is right a friend on here named rossiski had the same thing with temps, how ever he did find a fix for his you have to change 3 profiles to get better fan speeds.

Drop him a IM i'm sure he would not mind. I'll drop him a e-mail for you too as i'm not to sure how often he be checking these forums as seen he has his system pretty much sorted out now..
AsRock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 07:31 PM   #21
tomcug
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 98 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts

System Specs

You can modify your card's BIOS with RBE to change fan speed. If your card'll be still artifacting, then you should RMA it.
tomcug is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 07:36 PM   #22
FR@NK
200 Posts
 
FR@NK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 483 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 78 Times in 67 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomcug View Post
AMD is hiding something for sure, because after changing filename to Fur.exe score went back to 6590 points. I'm pretty sure it has something to do with those unstable Power Color Radeon HD 4870 PCS+ cards.
Furmark has been known to kill the new HD4800 series because it pushes these cards beyond what normal gaming or benching would. So AMD is using the newer drivers to limit the card's power when running furmark.exe.
FR@NK is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 07:39 PM   #23
tomcug
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 98 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts

System Specs

FR@NK, but can you explain why the hell Catalyst 8.8 drivers cause performace drop in FurMark of 100%? I's more than very high performance drop . I understand that they don't want people to RMA cards killed by FurMark but with this limitation cards use only 50% of their full potential .
tomcug is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 07:41 PM   #24
boogah
500 Posts
 
boogah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 865 (0.48/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 146 Times in 140 Posts

System Specs

normal consumers don't run furmark and benchmarking programs on daily/hourly basis ^___~
boogah is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 24, 2008, 07:43 PM   #25
tomcug
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 98 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts

System Specs

Normal consumers don't buy cards which cost more than $500 .
tomcug is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The 4800 series Driver, OCing, Cooling and Tweaking Thread EastCoasthandle AMD / ATI 719 Mar 8, 2010 03:14 PM
9800GTX Faster => 9800GTX+ with a new performance driver . wolf2009 NVIDIA 26 Jun 21, 2008 05:38 AM
PCIe 1.0a to PCIe 2.0 Performance reviewed EastCoasthandle General Hardware 2 Jan 23, 2008 10:53 PM
ATI Unleashes the New Performance King for Gamers: Introducing the Radeon X1950 XTX malware News 5 Aug 24, 2006 12:16 AM
Corsair Announces Immediate Adoption of Enhanced Performance Profiles (EPP) malware News 3 May 16, 2006 01:44 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts