techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Graphics Cards

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jun 21, 2008, 07:27 PM   #1
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

Devil May Cry Benchmark Results Thread

I didn't see this posted. But if it's not posted lets start a thread showing our results using the Devil May Cry benchmark tool found here at TPU. All you do is download the benchmark tool and use it. You don't need the game in order to use the benchmarking tool.
Results should be either in 1680x1050 or 1280x1024 using 4xAA, DX9/DX10 max settings (provide both if you are able). Exceptions are made if you use lower native resolutions. That way results aren't all over the place and it makes for easier reading, thanks!









Results @ Other Resolutions, 4XAA (mostly), MAX Settings, DX9/DX10
ViciousXUSMC @ 1920x1200 8xAA 4850 CF..................... = 180.73.....130.45.....207.58.....136.53 (675/1000) DX9
ViciousXUSMC @ 1920x1200 8xAA 4850 CF..................... = 145.94.....103.25.....179.06.....119.90 (675/1000) DX10
dark2099 @ 1280x720 using 4850................................. = 211.56....175.91.....244.00.....132.47 DX9
Mussels @ 1024x720 using 8800GT................................ = 116.90....085.90....148.18.....079.65 DX9
OzzmanFloyd120 @ 1440x900 using 9600GT.................... = 76.30.....50.86......96.94......51.44 (750/1875/1000) DX9
p_o_s_pc @ 1152x720 using 6150SE............................. = 4.35.......4.32.......4.28........4.10 DX9




Results @ 1280x1024, 4XAA, MAX Settings, DX9
r1rhyder @ 1280x1024 using 3870 X2..................... = 389.50.....255.16.....519.09......276.56 DX9 (825/900)
warhammer @ 1280 using 8800GT SLI.................... = 253.49.....173.85.....313.20......167.87
Merkk at 1280 using a 3850 tri CF......................... = 220.67.....145.32.....273.68......178.88
kursah @ 1280 using a GTX 260............................ = 192.49.....121.18.....243.78......119.62 (745/1300/1530)
exodusprime1337 @ 1280 using 8800gts 512........... = 183.23.....148.87.....212.30......109.90 (775/1845/2100)
DOM @ 1280 using 9600GSO................................ = 152.58....103.85.....191.13.......109.87 Vmodded 850/2200/2125
wolf @ 1280x1024 using 9800 GTX........................ = 141.30.....101.22.....169.97........97.37 (800/2000/2502)
johnspack @ 1280x1024 using 9800 GTX................ = 134.54.....103.96.....150.42......92.64 DX9 (775/1800/2300)
{JNT}Raptor @ 1280 using 8800 GT...................... = 132.21.......92.21.....157.69........88.97
JUDAS3 @ 1280x1024 using 8800 640.................... = 112.88......82.18.....133.08.........71.06 (OC)
Ninkobwi @ 1280 using 4850................................ = 109.43......77.02.....147.75.........80.11
DOM @ 9600 GSO using 1280............................... = 100.95......72.14.....112.80.........72.82 (800/985/2000)
Dr. Spankenstein @ 1280 using 3870..................... = 98.64.......65.11.....123.76.........82.31 (972/1242)
Eastcoast @ 1280 using 2900.............................. = 93.93.......58.04.....112.40.........70.54 (858/900)
From_Nowhere @ 1280 using 3850........................ = 84.06......53.18......109.84.........68.78 (775/1050)
MadClown @ 1280 using 3870.............................. = 83.69......53.45......106.11.........71.91 (800/1200)
FelipeV @ 1280 using 3870 X2............................. = 81.78......53.07......100.75.........67.30
merkk @ 1280 using 3850................................... = 63.73......41.66........73.02.........51.64 DX9 4xaa (no pic, 3 in CF)???
CrackerJack @ 1280 using 2900GT....................... = 41.53......26.06........47.20.........32.61



Results @ 1280x1024 4XAA, MAX Settings, DX10
r1rhyder @ 1280x1024 using 3870 X2.................... = 286.64.....192.19.....333.87.....219.07 DX10 (825/900)
exodusprime1337 @ 1280 using 8800gts 512........... = 205.96.....146.67.....234.40.....141.50 (775/1845/2100)
warhammer @ 1280 using 8800GT SL..................... = 188.36.....135.05.....235.11.....133.82 (no SS)
merkk @ 1280 using a 3850 CFX (3).......................= 178.62.....122.76.....213.76.....145.41 (no photo)
Psychoholic @ 1280 using 9800 GTX...................... = 174.47.....128.50.....204.74.....106.71 (825/2050/2470)
Live OR Die @ 1280x1024 using GTX 280SC............ = 172.59.....112.51.....221.20.....111.54 DX10
Wolf2009 @ 1280 using 4850CF............................ = 170.88.....120.06.....227.61.....143.61
FelipeV @ 1280 using a 3870 X2........................... = 163.05.....109.34.....202.60.....130.62 DX10
kursah @ 1280 using a GTX 260............................ = 151.72.....102.99.....188.00......99.11 (745/1300/1530)
{JNT}Raptor @ 1280 using 8800 GT...................... = 113.06.......77.57.....137.11.....82.57 (760/1050/1880)
Wolf2009 @ 1280 using 4850................................= 98.70........68.70.....127.85.....84.34
merkk @ 1280 using 3850.................................... = 75.00.......74.99.......75.01.....74.99 (no pic, 3 in CF)???
Wolf2009 @ 1280 using 9600............................... = 72.29.......47.60.......47.60.....51.41



Results @ 1680x1050 4XAA, MAX Settings, DX9
r1rhyder @ 1680x1050 using 3870 X2.................... = 319.63.....216.02....425.04.....257.85 DX9 (825/900)
exodusprime1337 @ 1680 using 8800 GTS 512......... = 175.57.....135.28....195.85.....111.27 (775/1845/2100)
Live OR Die @ 1680x1050 using GTX 280SC............. = 155.53.....106.10....203.75.....100.67 DX9
OzzmanFloyd120 @ 1680 using 9600GT SLI............. = 154.22.....103.95....194.92.....108.07 (750/1875/1000)
wolf @ 1680 using 4870...................................... = 139.39......94.34.....173.83.....105.04 (790/4400)
erocker @ 1680 using 4870.................................. = 130.50.....93.10.....163.61.......96.54 (stock)
FelipeV @ 1680 using 3870X2............................... = 129.64.....86.26.....159.66.....106.94 (918.2080)
DOM @ 1680 using 9600GSO................................ = 123.30.....85.44.....144.60.......91.19 Vmodded 850/2200/2125
wolf @ 1680x1050 using 9800 GTX........................ = 112.68.....82.04.....129.42.......82.38 (800/2000/2502)
{JNT}Raptor @ 1680 using 8800 GT.......................= 102.83.....71.83.....115.41.......73.27 (760/1850/1000)
erocker @ 1680 using 4850.................................. = 99.68.....69.21....116.51.....76.99
Results @ 1280 using 4850...................................= 93.33.....65.44....114.28.....70.14
Eastcoast @ 1280 using 2900...............................= 76.33.....49.47......89.91.....59.35 (858/900)
From_Nowhere @ 1680 using 3850.........................= 66.97.....43.54......87.71.....55.82


Results @ 1680x1050 4XAA, MAX Settings, DX10
r1rhyder @ 1680x1050 using 3870 X2...................... = 232.60...161.34.....282.55...182.66 DX10 (825/900)
FelipeV at 1680 using 4870 X2............................... = 228.97...173.28.....273.20...163.90 (790/3960)
Live OR Die @ 1680x1050 using GTX 280SC............. = 169.15...113.49.....211.43...102.80 (750/1540/1285)
exodusprime1337 @ 1680 using 8800gts 512........... = 163.18....118.56.....203.70...119.81 (775/1845/2100)
FelipeV @ 1680 using a 3870 X2........................... = 134.36......94.36.....171.15...108.86
OzzmanFloyd120 @ 1680 using 9600GT SLI............ = 127.97......90.75.....159.29.....91.65 750/1875/1000
Neo83 @ 1680 using a 4870................................. = 121.31.....84.80.....146.87.....90.07 (800 / 1000 using a 64 X2)
batmang @ 1680 using a 3870 CF......................... = 120.64.....87.54.....157.81.....97.30 (830/1141)
Live OR Die at 1680 using GTX 280SC ................... = 114.96.....84.66.....141.43.....76.40
Psychoholic @ 1680 using 9800 GTX...................... = 78.63.....60.04......92.30......54.69 (825/2050/2470)
Neo83 @ 1680x1050 using 3870............................ = 67.01.......46.53......78.74....54.69 (905/???)



EastCoastHandle

Eastcoasthandle

Last edited by EastCoasthandle; Sep 24, 2008 at 02:58 AM.
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 09:09 PM   #2
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

anyone else tried this yet?
Oh, BTW use thumbnails so I can add them to the OP

Last edited by EastCoasthandle; Jun 21, 2008 at 09:20 PM.
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 09:15 PM   #3
Psychoholic
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 479 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 53 Times in 47 Posts

System Specs

downloading now


Quote:
Originally Posted by EastCoasthandle View Post
anyone else tried this yet?
__________________
Psychoholic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 09:21 PM   #4
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.94/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

Me as well. Will let you know later tonight.
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 09:28 PM   #5
wolf2009
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

Mine at 1280x1024 w/ 4 x AA :

With HD4850


With 9600GT


With 2x 4850 in CF


Last edited by wolf2009; Jun 21, 2008 at 10:39 PM.
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 09:42 PM   #6
FelipeV
75 Posts
 
FelipeV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brazil
Posts: 90 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 16 Times in 13 Posts

System Specs

3870 X2 CAT 8.5 Stock, later i'll add with cat 8.6 and some overclock.

DX9 1680x1050 no AA.


DX10 1680x1050 8xAA (in-game)



DX10 1280x1024 4xAA (in-game)
FelipeV is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 09:53 PM   #7
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

FelipeV, if you can could you provide 1680 @ 4xAA. DX9 and DX10 and 1280 @ 4xADX9?
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 10:10 PM   #8
Psychoholic
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 479 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 53 Times in 47 Posts

System Specs

1680X1050 with 4XMSAA Everything set to Super high quality




1280X1024 Defaults

__________________
Psychoholic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 10:37 PM   #9
Psychoholic
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 479 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 53 Times in 47 Posts

System Specs

Hey eastcoast, i should have included in my post, my runs were at 825/2050/2470
__________________
Psychoholic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 11:33 PM   #10
merkk
75 Posts
 
merkk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 182 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 52 Times in 41 Posts

System Specs

Hi guys
I ran the test at defaults setting 1024x768 and 1280x1024 dx10 and dx9 but i'am a OLD FART
how are you taking the screen shot and posting them in the thread ? I could realy use some
help i like for people to be able what 3 3850 did and cpu at 2.7 it gose hand in hand with what
iam talking about in my other thread .
merkk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 11:34 PM   #11
FelipeV
75 Posts
 
FelipeV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brazil
Posts: 90 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 16 Times in 13 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by EastCoasthandle View Post
FelipeV, if you can could you provide 1680 @ 4xAA. DX9 and DX10 and 1280 @ 4xADX9?
Shure

Here it is, all @ stock X2 clocks.

DX9 1680 4xAA


DX9 1680 NoAA


DX9 1280 4xAA


DX9 1280 NoAA


DX10 1680 4xAA


DX10 1680 NoAA


DX10 1280 4xAA


DX10 1280 NoAA
FelipeV is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FelipeV For This Useful Post:
Old Jun 21, 2008, 11:35 PM   #12
ghost101
1000 Posts
 
ghost101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,170 (0.45/day)
Thanks: 73
Thanked 168 Times in 144 Posts

System Specs

Another benchmark to add to my suite .
ghost101 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 11:48 PM   #13
Kei
1000 Posts
 
Kei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,733 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 1,939
Thanked 618 Times in 507 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Kei

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by merkk View Post
Hi guys
I ran the test at defaults setting 1024x768 and 1280x1024 dx10 and dx9 but i'am a OLD FART
how are you taking the screen shot and posting them in the thread ? I could realy use some
help i like for people to be able what 3 3850 did and cpu at 2.7 it gose hand in hand with what
iam talking about in my other thread .
When the benchmark is finished running just hit the "Print Screen" button on the keyboard and it'll store it on the clipboard. After that exit the game/benchmark and go into any paint program and "paste" the shot and then just save.

I guess I'm gonna have to run this again and get a screenshot for you guys with my Phenom...I remember myself and a few others had issues taking screenshots in DX10 mode before. Hopefully I have no issues this time, my results were excellent though.

Btw, the game is fantastically gorgeous in DX10 mode with all the bells and whistles on.

K
Kei is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2008, 12:11 AM   #14
ghost101
1000 Posts
 
ghost101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,170 (0.45/day)
Thanks: 73
Thanked 168 Times in 144 Posts

System Specs

I maxxed (super-high on everything) this out at 1680*1050 with 8x AA and it runs flawlessly. Awful graphics for it to be using dx10 IMO, the lighting and blur effects are cool but object details are lacking. It even had the audacity to tell me to upgrade my system at the end.

Last edited by ghost101; Jun 22, 2008 at 12:18 AM.
ghost101 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2008, 12:18 AM   #15
Kei
1000 Posts
 
Kei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,733 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 1,939
Thanked 618 Times in 507 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Kei

System Specs

Awful...tell me you played with your eyes closed. This game is beautiful and even better looking than the console versions since we can up the eye candy (I did back to back 360 runs vs. this and there is a very big difference though both are gorgeous).

Did you run with Vsync on during the test...if so it will 'have the audacity' to tell you to upgrade because you were locked at 60fps. It'll do the same on any setup including mine which has even more firepower than yours does. Once you turn that off it'll be a different story...then again you ran at a awfully high resolution for a 3850 with 8xAA.

Did you have any other settings in CCC adjusted to add extra eye candy to the game because that will also skew the result.

I've selected the max AA I can get in CCC before but I don't think it fully utilizes it (32x AA) as the framerate was still quite high (119fps avg while playing but it did drop to 112fps a few times). I think the game limits how much AA you can use but I'll run the benchmark again and see what my results are.

I'm gonna go try it in Kuma (dual core mode) settings to see the result instead of turning on two more cores.

K
Kei is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2008, 12:27 AM   #16
ghost101
1000 Posts
 
ghost101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,170 (0.45/day)
Thanks: 73
Thanked 168 Times in 144 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kei View Post
Awful...tell me you played with your eyes closed. This game is beautiful and even better looking than the console versions since we can up the eye candy (I did back to back 360 runs vs. this and there is a very big difference though both are gorgeous).
I may have been a bit harsh. I was actually benching lots of games today to see how my card compares to the HD4850 which i'll get later on today. Call of Duty 4, Crysis, World in Conflict, 3Dmark Vantage, Lost Planet and then this. So didnt impress me much.

Quote:
Did you run with Vsync on during the test...if so it will 'have the audacity' to tell you to upgrade because you were locked at 60fps. It'll do the same on any setup including mine which has even more firepower than yours does. Once you turn that off it'll be a different story...then again you ran at a awfully high resolution for a 3850 with 8xAA.
Well I suppose it does have an average a fair bit below 60fps for scene 2. The fact its recommending a hardware upgrade is ridiculous. Asking me to upgrade my system is being too cocky. This may have affecting my assessment of the graphics as well I suppose.

If it tells me to upgrade after putting in my 4850, expect another rant.

Also, did you guys use FRAPs to get screenshots? I get black screens from using print screen with this benchmark.

Last edited by ghost101; Jun 22, 2008 at 12:37 AM.
ghost101 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2008, 12:42 AM   #17
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

ok guys, were are your benchmark results?
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2008, 12:45 AM   #18
EnergyFX
1000 Posts
 
EnergyFX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 1,396 (0.69/day)
Thanks: 477
Thanked 350 Times in 237 Posts

System Specs

Something is wrong with it. It errors at load saying Pyhsx processor is not installed, but it is.
__________________
Feedback/Rep: Heat -- eBay

There is an elegant solution for every problem... and sometimes elegance comes in the form of a very large hammer.

Last edited by EnergyFX; Jun 22, 2008 at 11:07 AM.
EnergyFX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2008, 01:10 AM   #19
wolf2009
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

u forgot my cf result .
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2008, 01:43 AM   #20
Kei
1000 Posts
 
Kei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,733 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 1,939
Thanked 618 Times in 507 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Kei

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghost101 View Post
I may have been a bit harsh. I was actually benching lots of games today to see how my card compares to the HD4850 which i'll get later on today. Call of Duty 4, Crysis, World in Conflict, 3Dmark Vantage, Lost Planet and then this. So didnt impress me much.



Well I suppose it does have an average a fair bit below 60fps for scene 2. The fact its recommending a hardware upgrade is ridiculous. Asking me to upgrade my system is being too cocky. This may have affecting my assessment of the graphics as well I suppose.

If it tells me to upgrade after putting in my 4850, expect another rant.

Also, did you guys use FRAPs to get screenshots? I get black screens from using print screen with this benchmark.

Indeed I think the rating had a bit of influence on your judgement. No biggie as I said if you enable Vsync and even if you never drop below 60fps the entire benchmark it will still say you need a hardware upgrade because you didn't go higher. It makes sense why it says that but obviously it's not really needed.

I've attatched my test using two cores clocked at 2.9Ghz and the graphics cards clocked at 850/1197. That's down from all four cores running 3.1Ghz and the cards at 880/1305. I also left everything else stock (northbridge, ram, ht link, etc.) so that's only the processor and gpu clocks during the test.

Taken at 1360*768 which is the native resolution on my LCD panel (32") and with 8xAA 16xAF, and adaptive AA (multi and super both on full). All the bells and whistles you can turn on in the game. A very good result for crippling my system...

K

Edit: use FRAPS to take your screenshot if you're using DX10 as for some reason it will only give you a black screen if you use Print Screen.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DevilMayCry.jpg
Views:	164
Size:	131.4 KB
ID:	15616  
Kei is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2008, 02:19 AM   #21
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by FelipeV View Post
Shure

Here it is, all @ stock X2 clocks.

DX9 1680 4xAA


DX9 1680 NoAA


DX9 1280 4xAA


DX9 1280 NoAA


DX10 1680 4xAA


DX10 1680 NoAA


DX10 1280 4xAA


DX10 1280 NoAA
Ok, I've caught something. Is there a bug between AA and no AA when using DX10? Look at the results using DX10. AA has higher score then without AA.

Last edited by EastCoasthandle; Jun 22, 2008 at 02:26 AM.
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2008, 02:36 AM   #22
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psychoholic View Post
Hey eastcoast, i should have included in my post, my runs were at 825/2050/2470
Are you using SLI?
Did you use all max with 4xAA?

Last edited by EastCoasthandle; Jun 22, 2008 at 03:18 AM.
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2008, 02:51 AM   #23
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,292 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,817
Thanked 12,452 Times in 7,918 Posts

System Specs

WTH, when I try to take a screen-shot using prtscrn, all I get is black when I paste into Paint. So, max settings 4x AA is the criteria? What about 8x?
__________________
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2008, 02:54 AM   #24
merkk
75 Posts
 
merkk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 182 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 52 Times in 41 Posts

System Specs

Hi Guys
here my dx9 runs. All runs were with my Phenom cpu clock at 2.7 and i use defaults setting.
the dx10 runs screen shot came out back so for now i just wright them in .

1024x768 directX 10 defaults setting
scene1 245.87
scene2 218.56
scene3 245.82
scene4 122.31

1280x1024 directX 10 defaults setting
scene1 201.03
scene2 172.20
scene3 230.58
scene4 102.06

i love the way 3850 scale in crossfireX
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	benchmark.jpg
Views:	147
Size:	42.2 KB
ID:	15620   Click image for larger version

Name:	benchmark2.jpg
Views:	142
Size:	181.1 KB
ID:	15621  
merkk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2008, 02:59 AM   #25
merkk
75 Posts
 
merkk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 182 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 52 Times in 41 Posts

System Specs

Sorry for the small screen shot post this screen shot stuff all new to me
merkk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RV770 benchmark results MrMilli AMD / ATI 43 May 8, 2008 12:37 AM
Cat 7.11 is out! EastCoasthandle Graphics Cards 4 Nov 22, 2007 12:07 AM
2900 pro benchmark results. JC316 Graphics Cards 46 Oct 12, 2007 01:47 AM
benchmark results for an X800 SE AIW mack99 Graphics Cards 1 May 13, 2007 03:21 PM
Futuremark® Announces SPMark™Java06 Benchmark Dark Ride News 0 Jan 17, 2006 11:37 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts