techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > Articles

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 22, 2008, 07:25 PM   #1
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,758 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,207 Times in 3,156 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

AMD sent HD 4830 samples to reviewers with missing shaders

To read this article go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/articles/other/155

Last edited by W1zzard; Oct 25, 2008 at 08:14 AM.
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 23, 2008, 04:13 AM   #2
Solaris17
Creator Solaris Utility DVD
 
Solaris17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Reinacting scenes from platoon with Charlie Sheen
Posts: 13,708 (4.84/day)
Thanks: 4,365
Thanked 3,295 Times in 2,311 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Solaris17 Send a message via AIM to Solaris17 Send a message via MSN to Solaris17 Send a message via Yahoo to Solaris17 Send a message via Skype™ to Solaris17

System Specs

Intriguing ill see if we have a sample.

Do you think their were 2 different batches? 560SP for internal testing until they finally decided on a shippable 640SP?
__________________
I Made the Millionth post! | "Please come to WI now so I can beat you over the head with a bratwurst."-Kreij
PS3 mod 8500/8600GT Mod Guide Rebuild a Copperhead Heat Ware
NF4 Ultra SLI Mod Solaris Utility DVD 4.0 Broken CPU pin guide
Vista Mark
Solaris17 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 04:22 AM   #3
wolf2009
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

interesting .

How did you disable SIMD ?
 
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 04:36 AM   #4
Steevo
Eligible for custom title
 
Steevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,567 (2.02/day)
Thanks: 238
Thanked 979 Times in 729 Posts

System Specs

Pushing the big red button. Might get a fix for opening other doors and getting shaders back.
__________________

“it would have been perfect....its got trains and the line"tech your kids not to do what iv done"(or similar) because i had obviously done something to warrent 2 e-thugs to come 4000miles out of their way and kill me.” -Solaris17
“yeah i failed. i noticed the "coming soon" part after i posted.” -Mussels
“people are just stupid.” -W1zzard
Yes I am evil, yes you can have some.
Steevo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 05:25 AM   #5
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,076 (4.69/day)
Thanks: 1,359
Thanked 1,159 Times in 1,035 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

well if its a disable bit, i wonder if its hard disabled or just bios disabled, because you could modify the disable bit to get the 640 shaders, but i think this was the bios encoders fault or something.
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 06:20 AM   #6
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by eidairaman1 View Post
well if its a disable bit, i wonder if its hard disabled or just bios disabled, because you could modify the disable bit to get the 640 shaders, but i think this was the bios encoders fault or something.
Did you read the article?

Quote:
The locking mechanism relies on fuses inside the GPU, or on the substrate - a mechanism similar to Intel's multiplier locking. It is not reversible as far as I know. It is however possible to temporarily disable _additional_ fuses to reduce the shader count even further.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 11:44 AM   #7
ArkanHell
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Paraguay
Posts: 96 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts

Wiz, you are the man.
ArkanHell is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 01:26 PM   #8
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,735 (6.49/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,110 Times in 3,702 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
I am also 100% certain that shipping cards with 560 shaders was not intended by AMD at any time. Why should they make their own product slower?
They've done in the past.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 03:00 PM   #9
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.18/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

The King of all Wizards.

THANKS FOR THE INFO!
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 03:54 PM   #10
thebluebumblebee
2000 Posts
 
thebluebumblebee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Portland, OR USA
Posts: 2,138 (1.20/day)
Thanks: 1,553
Thanked 878 Times in 625 Posts

System Specs

Did you pull the coolers to see if the chips are labeled the same?
thebluebumblebee is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 04:07 PM   #11
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,758 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,207 Times in 3,156 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluebumblebee View Post
Did you pull the coolers to see if the chips are labeled the same?
look at the two reviews. i took photos of both gpus
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 04:16 PM   #12
thebluebumblebee
2000 Posts
 
thebluebumblebee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Portland, OR USA
Posts: 2,138 (1.20/day)
Thanks: 1,553
Thanked 878 Times in 625 Posts

System Specs

oops
thebluebumblebee is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 04:42 PM   #13
suraswami
Eligible for custom title
 
suraswami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 5,138 (1.73/day)
Thanks: 849
Thanked 601 Times in 532 Posts

System Specs

[QUOTE=W1zzard;I am also 100% certain that shipping cards with 560 shaders was not intended by AMD at any time. Why should they make their own product slower?[/QUOTE]

Any chance Powercolor screwed it up with a wrong bios? If AMD intended to ship with 560 shaders with a reasonable reduced price over 4850 with that kind of performance hit, I think it makes sense. I believe the 4830 is going to be around $150 and 4850 can be got at that price after rebates. If the 560 shader one comes in around $110 then it will be a balanced card.

my 2 cents.
__________________
2 Servers Multiple VMs including WHS on VM, capacity 3.5 TB HDD
Family Machine - W7 Ultimate 64bit, ECS 780G, Phenom II X3 720BE @ 3.1Ghz- 1.38V, 4GB DDR2 800 ram, Sapphire 4670 512MB, 600W Ultra X pro, Xigmatek HDT-S1283

"Oh please, the only thing more resilient than an Indian is a cockroach. Not even nukes can stop their immune systems" - TheMailMan78
suraswami is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 05:06 PM   #14
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,758 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,207 Times in 3,156 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by suraswami View Post
Any chance Powercolor screwed it up with a wrong bios? If AMD intended to ship with 560 shaders with a reasonable reduced price over 4850 with that kind of performance hit, I think it makes sense. I believe the 4830 is going to be around $150 and 4850 can be got at that price after rebates. If the 560 shader one comes in around $110 then it will be a balanced card.

my 2 cents.
why would amd state 640 shaders in their product brief then and risk to be exposed?
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 05:11 PM   #15
suraswami
Eligible for custom title
 
suraswami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 5,138 (1.73/day)
Thanks: 849
Thanked 601 Times in 532 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
why would amd state 640 shaders in their product brief then and risk to be exposed?
that part is bit shady. Had they said 560 and kept the price down with excellent media center capabilities I will jump on this.
__________________
2 Servers Multiple VMs including WHS on VM, capacity 3.5 TB HDD
Family Machine - W7 Ultimate 64bit, ECS 780G, Phenom II X3 720BE @ 3.1Ghz- 1.38V, 4GB DDR2 800 ram, Sapphire 4670 512MB, 600W Ultra X pro, Xigmatek HDT-S1283

"Oh please, the only thing more resilient than an Indian is a cockroach. Not even nukes can stop their immune systems" - TheMailMan78
suraswami is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 05:11 PM   #16
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,735 (6.49/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,110 Times in 3,702 Posts

System Specs

I'm sure it wasn't intentional, really. The 560 SP cards were more than likely early samples, that probably just got mixed up when sending them out to reviewers. They certainly wouldn't intentionally send out the lower shader cards to the reviewers. I just hope none of them got sent out to retail channels.

Quote:
Originally Posted by suraswami View Post
Any chance Powercolor screwed it up with a wrong bios? If AMD intended to ship with 560 shaders with a reasonable reduced price over 4850 with that kind of performance hit, I think it makes sense. I believe the 4830 is going to be around $150 and 4850 can be got at that price after rebates. If the 560 shader one comes in around $110 then it will be a balanced card.

my 2 cents.
The HD4830 is already available on newegg for $119 after rebate, or at least it was yesterday.

Edit: The PowerColor one is actually available for $114.99 after rebate.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate

Last edited by newtekie1; Oct 23, 2008 at 05:20 PM.
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to newtekie1 For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 23, 2008, 05:13 PM   #17
Kreij
Hardcore Monkey Moderator
 
Kreij's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cheeseland (Wisconsin, USA)
Posts: 12,103 (5.28/day)
Thanks: 591
Thanked 5,488 Times in 2,932 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
why would amd state 640 shaders in their product brief then and risk to be exposed?
Quote:
When I added shader count reading support to GPU-Z yesterday
They didn't think you would get GPU-Z to figure it out so quick?
__________________

Cloud (noun, singular): A dynamic arrangement of multiple potential single points of failure, with a user at one end and their data at the other.


Get more tech news on a wide variety of topics at NextPowerUp
Kreij is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 05:41 PM   #18
Polaris573
Senior Moderator
 
Polaris573's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Little Rock, USA
Posts: 3,284 (1.09/day)
Thanks: 68
Thanked 765 Times in 451 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Polaris573

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kreij View Post
They didn't think you would get GPU-Z to figure it out so quick?
When any product leaves a factory, in this case GPUs, an in depth analysis in not performed on every single unit rather a single unit is selected from that batch (production run of indefinite length) and only that unit is tested. This is generally enough to insure the quality of a batch of product, but if the manufacturing process is for some reason incorrectly producing 1 out of every 4 units a tester can easily miss that when only testing one unit from a batch. These are common quality control procedures, and while I do not know AMD's precise QC procedure I'm sure a scenario like similar to what was mentioned above is conceivable. When dealing with corporations there is a tendency for many people, without thinking about the situation, to jump on the "guilty until proven innocent" bandwagon. While it is entirely possible that it is conspiracy, it is more likely that when producing thousands of units a bad batch escaped.
__________________

Lector benevole, legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus. Accipere quam facere praestat injuriam

Fold for Techpowerup!
Polaris573 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 05:44 PM   #19
Kreij
Hardcore Monkey Moderator
 
Kreij's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cheeseland (Wisconsin, USA)
Posts: 12,103 (5.28/day)
Thanks: 591
Thanked 5,488 Times in 2,932 Posts

System Specs

My comment was meant to be tongue-in-cheek

I do not think AMD is trying to pull a fast one.
__________________

Cloud (noun, singular): A dynamic arrangement of multiple potential single points of failure, with a user at one end and their data at the other.


Get more tech news on a wide variety of topics at NextPowerUp
Kreij is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 06:05 PM   #20
suraswami
Eligible for custom title
 
suraswami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 5,138 (1.73/day)
Thanks: 849
Thanked 601 Times in 532 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
I'm sure it wasn't intentional, really. The 560 SP cards were more than likely early samples, that probably just got mixed up when sending them out to reviewers. They certainly wouldn't intentionally send out the lower shader cards to the reviewers. I just hope none of them got sent out to retail channels.



The HD4830 is already available on newegg for $119 after rebate, or at least it was yesterday.

Edit: The PowerColor one is actually available for $114.99 after rebate.
oops I didn't see that. hmm I checked yesterday for 4670 but don't remember seeing this. oh well.
__________________
2 Servers Multiple VMs including WHS on VM, capacity 3.5 TB HDD
Family Machine - W7 Ultimate 64bit, ECS 780G, Phenom II X3 720BE @ 3.1Ghz- 1.38V, 4GB DDR2 800 ram, Sapphire 4670 512MB, 600W Ultra X pro, Xigmatek HDT-S1283

"Oh please, the only thing more resilient than an Indian is a cockroach. Not even nukes can stop their immune systems" - TheMailMan78
suraswami is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2008, 09:10 PM   #21
dwarf
Neoseeker Staff
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 11 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Hey, this is Kevin from Neoseeker. I wanted to report that my ATI review sample HD 4830 is missing the shaders.

When I started work today I was sort of surprised when glancing over some other reviews stating that the HD 4830 kicks the 9800 GT's ass. That wasn't what I found. Now it makes a bit more sense.

Sort of nullifies my review, which sucks. Ah well; so it goes.

Great work W1zzard, investigating this. You are the man.
dwarf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 24, 2008, 09:51 AM   #22
davidletterboyz
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

I noticed that all the early reviews (that shows GPU-Z screenie) that received HD4830s from AMD have 560sp. If u google a bit for reviews with GPU-Z screenies, those HIS and Powercolor samples have 640sp. I guess it's a human mistake from AMD's side, packing the wrong samples? LOL
davidletterboyz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 24, 2008, 10:30 AM   #23
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,758 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,207 Times in 3,156 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

bump for updated bios in article
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 24, 2008, 10:41 AM   #24
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.49/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Was it AMD that released the BIOS? Or did a third party mod the BIOS? Just curious.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 24, 2008, 10:45 AM   #25
alexp999
Staff
 
alexp999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dorset, UK
Posts: 6,728 (3.17/day)
Thanks: 684
Thanked 915 Times in 783 Posts
Send a message via MSN to alexp999

System Specs

So if I'm reading this right. All HD4830 GPUs are hard locked to 640SP, but for some reason the ati cards shipped with a bios locked to 560SP?
So a simple flash sets it back at 640SP?
__________________

ASUS P45 Club [FS] [WTB] Heatware ebay
Elite Lounge USB Boot Guide 3DMark Vantage
My Rig XBOX Gamertag Steam ID
Dad's: EVGA 750i FTW, E6600, F7Pro, 4GB, 8800GTS 640MB SLi, SST 750W, Commodore EVE Gallente Case
alexp999 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD launches Turion™ 64 X2 CPUs Darksaber News 4 Jan 30, 2009 10:08 AM
AMD Puma Mobile Platform Unleashed malware News 1 Jun 5, 2008 01:26 AM
I've moved to the Darkside does anyone have this motherboard trt740 Overclocking & Cooling 27 May 23, 2007 05:10 PM
System Builder's Guide 2006 djbbenn Articles 37 Aug 25, 2006 02:47 AM
AMD launches Opteron 100 Series with ECC unbuffered memory support grazzhoppa News 0 Aug 2, 2005 10:47 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts