techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News > TPU Frontpage Polls

View Poll Results: Will you switch to Intel Core i7 ?
Yes, this year 519 4.84%
Yes, next year 1,860 17.36%
No, I will stay with Core 2 3,227 30.12%
AMD - Smarter Choice 5,108 47.68%
Voters: 10714. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Dec 1, 2008, 11:45 PM   #176
MarcusTaz
200 Posts
 
MarcusTaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 404 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 29
Thanked 32 Times in 25 Posts
Send a message via MSN to MarcusTaz

System Specs

I also read it effected the 64 bit OS more?
__________________



www.hrgamers.com

Come Frag with us!!
MarcusTaz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 1, 2008, 11:51 PM   #177
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,594 (10.88/day)
Thanks: 3,709
Thanked 8,714 Times in 6,407 Posts

System Specs

yeah phenoms one required like 4 VMwares running at once in order to crash. the bad press was because that 0.1% of users got a 'fix' which crippled memory performance instead.
Mussels is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2008, 01:37 AM   #178
MarcusTaz
200 Posts
 
MarcusTaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 404 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 29
Thanked 32 Times in 25 Posts
Send a message via MSN to MarcusTaz

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
yeah phenoms one required like 4 VMwares running at once in order to crash. the bad press was because that 0.1% of users got a 'fix' which crippled memory performance instead.

Thank you for the clarification.
__________________



www.hrgamers.com

Come Frag with us!!
MarcusTaz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4, 2008, 03:17 PM   #179
CrissTM
 
CrissTM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Core 2 in this moment is more than enuff for gaming and surfing . The i7 is much to expansive for all the buggs that comes with it. After all i find no need in desktop for a i7.
So, Core i7 =>
__________________
CrissTM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2008, 03:30 AM   #180
merkk
75 Posts
 
merkk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 182 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 52 Times in 41 Posts

System Specs

Well i will be staying with my all AMD rig . I will just up grade to a new Phenom 2 (940) cpu in the next month . Later in 2009 i will up date my video card set.
merkk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2008, 03:33 AM   #181
trickson
OH, I have such a headache
 
trickson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 6,154 (1.97/day)
Thanks: 1,947
Thanked 922 Times in 757 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by merkk View Post
Well i will be staying with my all AMD rig . I will just up grade to a new Phenom 2 (940) cpu in the next month . Later in 2009 i will up date my video card set.
OH MAN sorry to here that !
trickson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 9, 2008, 03:23 AM   #182
Mark_Hardware
200 Posts
 
Mark_Hardware's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Az
Posts: 255 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 55 Times in 48 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to Mark_Hardware

System Specs

I'm staying Core 2. Intel has something else coming, so IMO i7 is dangerously close to a screw job.... But I got ragged on pretty hard before for saying I am using a Core 2, so idk...
__________________
Never trust a computer you can't throw out a window.
Steve Wozniak
Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users?
Clifford Stoll


Project; Mark1
Mark_Hardware is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 9, 2008, 03:28 AM   #183
Sonido
200 Posts
 
Sonido's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 349 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 88 Times in 49 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hardware_Mark1 View Post
I'm staying Core 2. Intel has something else coming, so IMO i7 is dangerously close to a screw job.... But I got ragged on pretty hard before for saying I am using a Core 2, so idk...
Intel already has a TLB bug. Unless i7's and their motherboards get a whole lot cheaper, I am going AMD.
__________________
My Heatware
Sonido is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 9, 2008, 03:59 AM   #184
Binge
Overclocking Surrealism
 
Binge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,065 (3.49/day)
Thanks: 948
Thanked 1,768 Times in 1,308 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Binge Send a message via MSN to Binge

System Specs

deerrr I switched already by mistake >.< lol I love it!
__________________
I *UNITE* streamers and content providers on TPU!
My Heatware


Matias Quiet Pro (PC) / KBTalking Pro / Das Keyboard Professional S
Binge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 9, 2008, 04:47 PM   #185
InfDamarvel
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 461 (0.18/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonido View Post
Intel already has a TLB bug. Unless i7's and their motherboards get a whole lot cheaper, I am going AMD.
Which the problem was solved before release...I know its already been stated but there are always a multiple of bugs when these cpus are produced. The question is only if the bugs can be solved before retail production.
InfDamarvel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 9, 2008, 04:59 PM   #186
GAR
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 75 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to GAR

System Specs

WOW, surprised to see people still sayin AMD is a smarter choice LOL. I guess they dont care for performance. The extra $50 for Intel is worth it. If you are that cheap, you deserve a Athlon X2.
GAR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 9, 2008, 05:09 PM   #187
Gam'ster
500 Posts
 
Gam'ster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Wales, UK
Posts: 783 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 204
Thanked 117 Times in 114 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by GAR View Post
WOW, surprised to see people still sayin AMD is a smarter choice LOL. I guess they dont care for performance. The extra $50 for Intel is worth it. If you are that cheap, you deserve a Athlon X2.
Please show me an i7 thats only 50 more than any AMD phenom out currently
But for me AMD does me fine, if you want i7 then go for it but not for me im afraid.
Gam'ster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 9, 2008, 06:17 PM   #188
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.07/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by GAR View Post
WOW, surprised to see people still sayin AMD is a smarter choice LOL. I guess they dont care for performance. The extra $50 for Intel is worth it. If you are that cheap, you deserve a Athlon X2.
Yeah -- sorry I don't have $600 to spend on just a motherboard+CPU+RAM like you.

Where's this "extra $50?"
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 9, 2008, 07:34 PM   #189
GAR
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 75 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to GAR

System Specs

Dont get me wrong, i LOVE AMD, but i go where performance is, and AMD is not offering much, I meant $50 more for a core 2 duo, AMD is not much cheaper, you can get an E2200 for $70, overclocks to 3ghz + and outperforms and AMD system comparable in price by far.
GAR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 11, 2008, 12:23 PM   #190
Xaser04
500 Posts
 
Xaser04's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Zummerzet UK
Posts: 681 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 90 Times in 58 Posts

System Specs

No its a terrible waste of money..........


Hang on
__________________

Now in Surround

BF3 (Origin) - Xaser04

Xaser04 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2008, 06:50 PM   #191
karolpl2004
200 Posts
 
karolpl2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 446 (0.16/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Send a message via AIM to karolpl2004 Send a message via MSN to karolpl2004

System Specs

rofl amd ftw!
karolpl2004 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2008, 06:55 PM   #192
kysg
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pacoima, CA
Posts: 974 (0.55/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 99 Times in 96 Posts

System Specs

heh, staying AMD, it makes more sense, I have yet to see a chipset from intel or nvidia that really takes care of business. further more, I feel i7 just aint worth it, I got more important things to spend money on, like a decent monitor and gpu (ATI) to back whatever AMD processor I get.
kysg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 16, 2008, 07:39 AM   #193
little
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 4 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Well ... a little 50% for AMD smarter choice. But where am I ?

I understand that due to the price of DDR3 and X58 motherboards only a few people are interested in switching to core i7, but who can choose to switch to an AMD processor today ?

If you take the example of Crysis, the Phenom X4 9950 is beaten by a "poor" E4500 (low res).
Even on multithreaded applications the best Phenom does not match a Q6600, which costs a bit less.

So people, tell me why are you voting AMD ?
I still have an "old" Opteron 165 and I really enjoyed it. At that time AMD was ruling the world of CPU with their Athlon (s754 / s939)... but now, who would be fool enough to buy a Phenom instead of a good C2D or C2Q ?
little is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 16, 2008, 09:42 AM   #194
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,099 (4.63/day)
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 1,164 Times in 1,040 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by little View Post
Well ... a little 50% for AMD smarter choice. But where am I ?

I understand that due to the price of DDR3 and X58 motherboards only a few people are interested in switching to core i7, but who can choose to switch to an AMD processor today ?

If you take the example of Crysis, the Phenom X4 9950 is beaten by a "poor" E4500 (low res).
Even on multithreaded applications the best Phenom does not match a Q6600, which costs a bit less.

So people, tell me why are you voting AMD ?
I still have an "old" Opteron 165 and I really enjoyed it. At that time AMD was ruling the world of CPU with their Athlon (s754 / s939)... but now, who would be fool enough to buy a Phenom instead of a good C2D or C2Q ?
Ill say 1 thing, Crysis has a Hard time running on any machine so there is really no excuse to use that as a benchmark for systems when its poorly coded, also say that Intel is better at it because OMG it Plays 15FPS on a Intel at max Detail without Much Goin on in the Picture. Sorry if i Last Recall 30-60 FPS without a Spike of FPS Loss is the Ideal for any game and most actually run well above 30-60 without loss, where anything less than 30 is unbearable.
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 16, 2008, 10:41 AM   #195
little
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 4 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by eidairaman1 View Post
Ill say 1 thing, Crysis has a Hard time running on any machine so there is really no excuse to use that as a benchmark for systems when its poorly coded, also say that Intel is better at it because OMG it Plays 15FPS on a Intel at max Detail without Much Goin on in the Picture. Sorry if i Last Recall 30-60 FPS without a Spike of FPS Loss is the Ideal for any game and most actually run well above 30-60 without loss, where anything less than 30 is unbearable.

I do agree that Crysis is not the most optimized game I ever seen..
Even if today a Phenom is good enough to play at any game, it will struggle faster than a good C2D. But in my opinion the problem is not being "enough", it is the performance / price ratio. And in this matter the C2D & C2Q do have a clear advantage.
Take a look at this test:
http://www.matbe.com/articles/lire/1...eurs/page9.php
little is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 16, 2008, 10:43 AM   #196
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,099 (4.63/day)
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 1,164 Times in 1,040 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

Btw What most people are looking at for AMD is Phenom 2, Athlon X4, and Kuma Core and Future X2 CPUs.
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alcpone's Official 3DMark '06 Compilation Alcpone General Software 4979 Sep 24, 2008 12:08 AM
Intel QX6700 Quad Core D_o_S Reviews 14 Jan 8, 2007 06:15 AM
System Builder's Guide 2006 djbbenn Articles 37 Aug 25, 2006 02:47 AM
ATI CrossFire and Intel Core 2 Extreme Platforms Now Available malware News 3 Jul 28, 2006 08:46 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts