3dMark05 scores :D

wazzledoozle · Sep 30, 2004, 03:17 AM

I got a 1015
The CPU tests were running at 0-2 fps

Sep 30, 2004, 08:35 AM

5547
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=27622
Try the ATI Hotfix. Supposedly for a game lockup. Raised '05 score by over 1200

That was weird anyway the link should work now.
I messed around a little and got it to 5803 but I think that
may be about it without a volt-mod

Viper007Bond · Sep 30, 2004, 01:10 PM

2318 -- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=6624

Didn't realize my card un-overclocked itself, probably when I upgraded the drivers. Doesn't matter though as I'm about to do a 128 MB 9800 Pro -> 128 MB 9800 XT conversion.

BTW rikit_zap - your link isn't valid. Update it to your new score or whatever you did.

Freddy23 · Sep 30, 2004, 02:49 PM

5650

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=5452

X800 XT @540/554, P4 2,8C (Northwood) @ 3,2 GHZ, 1024 MB Ram...

More PC Details here -> http://www.nethands.de/pys/show.php4?user=Freddy23

pablofrogo · Sep 30, 2004, 06:31 PM

2897, with my card at 442.80/391.50 (no artifacts throughout!)
2700 at stock

Sep 30, 2004, 11:56 PM

Thanks Viper. Fixed now...

pablofrogo · Oct 1, 2004, 03:28 PM

I'm going to run the game tests again, they look so good

Slayerstaps · Oct 1, 2004, 08:23 PM

pfff crap scores....25** with 4.6 catalyst 27** with 4.9 catalyst.

Frozen · Oct 1, 2004, 08:57 PM

I refuse to even run these any more

pablofrogo · Oct 1, 2004, 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slayerstaps

pfff crap scores....25** with 4.6 catalyst 27** with 4.9 catalyst.

What do you expect? This thing is supposed to last at least 2 years.

15th Warlock · Oct 3, 2004, 05:52 AM

2343

That's less than the score I got at 3Dmark01 with my GeForce 256 SDR 3 years ago

Oct 3, 2004, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 15th Warlock

2343

That's less than the score I got at 3Dmark01 with my GeForce 256 SDR 3 years ago

Warlock, what graphics card are you on? According to your sig, 9800Pro at XT speeds? you should get at least ~2700

15th Warlock · Oct 3, 2004, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nightelf84

Warlock, what graphics card are you on? According to your sig, 9800Pro at XT speeds? you should get at least ~2700

Yes, but my mobo is an ECS M925 with a Via P4M266 chipset, that means I'm using a crappy memory controller that doesn't allow dual channell DDR operation, and I can run only at 4X AGP

I think that's why I get such a low score

I tell you this because in some benchmarks, I can see my CPU is a serious bottleneck, take Doom3 at the high detail setting for example: I cannot get over 42+ FPS, be it on 640x480, 800x600 and 1024x768. But when I start using 1280x1024 my framerate drops to 38 FPS+.
I think getting 42+ FPS at all resolutions under 1024x768 means my CPU is a performance bottleneck, don't you agree? or... do you think I'm doing something wrong?

15th Warlock · Oct 3, 2004, 03:40 PM

Guess I was under the influence last night, I was wrong about the score I got, I checked it this morning, and I got 2422, not 2343, I'm not lying, you can check the date at the project's URL.

But in any case, do you think that's too low for my vidcard? I'm running on a WinXP SP2 OS tweaked for speed (by that I mean, my OS doesn't load all the crappy services or background programs) and using the new beta 4.11 Catalysts.

P.S. Kids, my advice is that you shouldn't post your scores while you're drunk

d_o_n · Oct 3, 2004, 06:07 PM

I got finally 5404 points. with my x800 pro @ xt 526/573 and a P4 3 Ghz.

Slayerstaps · Oct 3, 2004, 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pablofrogo

What do you expect? This thing is supposed to last at least 2 years.

I don expect anything i just run it and look.
Eventhough they have a new even nicer 3dmark i still think 3dmark is not the way to benchmark vid cards or anything else. Just use games for that.
So i only ran it 2 times and it stay's with that

cause i just don like 3dmark that much anymore.....

pablofrogo · Oct 3, 2004, 09:11 PM

I don't get why you run it and look..

Look for atrifacts? or just look at the pretty colours (I do that, especially Proxycon

)?

Slayerstaps · Oct 4, 2004, 06:01 AM

I look at the nice new technology that is usable for games nowadays. Although they don use it cause only some pc's can run those games at decent framerates.....
In my opinion 3dmark is more of a tech demo for new graphic technology and such...more of a look in the future to see how nice games are gonna look then

ati.bob · Oct 4, 2004, 07:35 AM

Slayerstaps's right.. 3Dmark is basically a demo that "over-stresses" some of the latest graphic fireworks that PC can generate.. It's not actually (read: not really) the performance you get on games unless those games that demand all the visual decorations to be turned on (really rare)..

Oct 4, 2004, 09:55 AM

oh my card is just 855 with sempron 2600 and 9550 128m

MikBach · Oct 4, 2004, 10:11 AM

9800PRO 256 MB 380/340
Cat 4.9
VGA 2445
G1 9,7 fps
G2 7,1 fps
G3 13,5 fps

Cat 4.11
VGA 2722
G1 12,9 fps
G2 7,5 fps
G3 13,3 fps

420/340
VGA 2922

460/360
VGA 3180

ati.bob · Oct 4, 2004, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nczhivago

oh my card is just 855 with sempron 2600 and 9550 128m

OMG! Then the results of my PC must be more terrible than yours.. maybe around 500 3Dmarks..

Slayerstaps · Oct 4, 2004, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ati.bob

Slayerstaps's right.. 3Dmark is basically a demo that "over-stresses" some of the latest graphic fireworks that PC can generate.

Dude, i'm always right

(spam

)
But yeah like i said it's just a sort of tech demo but not everyone sees it like that and only go for the scores...so that's why i think it's lame...real games still give a better impression of how good a vid card really preforms. Imo 3dmark is not capable of that...

Xylitol · Oct 4, 2004, 08:29 PM

6,300

pablofrogo · Oct 5, 2004, 08:00 PM

Update: With cats 4.11 I get 3170

Sep 30, 2004, 03:17 AM	#1
wazzledoozle Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Seattle Posts: 4,316 (1.36/day) Thanks: 23 Thanked 166 Times in 89 Posts System Specs	3dMark05 scores :D I got a 1015 The CPU tests were running at 0-2 fps __________________ *bellybuttons are great holes, their single purpose is to suck up pinkys* -DanTheBanjoman

Processor:	X2 3800+ @ 2.3 GHz
Motherboard:	DFI Lanparty SLI-DR
Cooling:	Zalman CNPS 9500 LED
Memory:	2x1 Gb OCZ Plat. @ 3-3-2-8-1t 460 MHz
Video Card:	HIS IceQ 4670 512Mb
Hard Disk:	640Gb & 160Gb western digital sata drives
Optical Drive:	NEC 16x DL DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	Hanns G 19" widescreen LCD w/ DVI 5ms
Case:	Thermaltake Soprano
Sound Card:	Audigy 2 softmod@Audigy 4, Logitech X-530 5:1
PSU:	Coolermaster eXtreme Power Plus 500w
Software:	XP Pro

Sep 30, 2004, 08:35 AM	#2
rikit_zap Guest Posts: n/a (0/day)	5547 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=27622 Try the ATI Hotfix. Supposedly for a game lockup. Raised '05 score by over 1200 That was weird anyway the link should work now. I messed around a little and got it to 5803 but I think that may be about it without a volt-mod Last edited by rikit_zap; Sep 30, 2004 at 05:58 PM. Reason: Link Update

Sep 30, 2004, 01:10 PM	#3
Viper007Bond Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Portland, OR, USA Posts: 31 (0.01/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post System Specs	2318 -- http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=6624 Didn't realize my card un-overclocked itself, probably when I upgraded the drivers. Doesn't matter though as I'm about to do a 128 MB 9800 Pro -> 128 MB 9800 XT conversion. BTW rikit_zap - your link isn't valid. Update it to your new score or whatever you did. __________________ - Viper007Bond

System Name:	May 2010 PC
Processor:	Intel Core i5-750 Lynnfield 2.66GHz LGA 1156 95W Quad-Core
Motherboard:	ASUS P7P55D-E LGA 1156 Intel P55 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0
Memory:	8GB (4x2GB) of CORSAIR XMS3 DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800)
Video Card:	EVGA GeForce GTX 470 (Fermi) 1280MB 320-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16
Hard Disk:	7 terabytes of various drives
CRT/LCD Model:	24" Westinghouse L2410NM LCD (1920x1200) & 23" Acer X233H LCD (1920x1200)
Case:	COOLER MASTER HAF 932 Full Tower (230mm fans!)
PSU:	CORSAIR HX Series CMPSU-850HX 850W (modular)
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate
Benchmarks:	http://v007.me/2010pc

Sep 30, 2004, 02:49 PM	#4
Freddy23 Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Germany Posts: 28 (0.01/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	5650 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=5452 X800 XT @540/554, P4 2,8C (Northwood) @ 3,2 GHZ, 1024 MB Ram... More PC Details here -> http://www.nethands.de/pys/show.php4?user=Freddy23

Sep 30, 2004, 06:31 PM	#5
pablofrogo Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Lytham... in England Posts: 180 (0.06/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	2897, with my card at 442.80/391.50 (no artifacts throughout!) 2700 at stock __________________ AMD Athlon XP-M 2400+ @ 20011 Abit NF-7S v2.0 1Gb Corsair VS PC3200 RAM @ (2.5-3-3-11) Leadtek A400 6800GT Creative Audigy 2 Seagate Barracuda 120gb 7200.7 2x Maxtor 5400RPM HDD Last edited by pablofrogo; Oct 1, 2004 at 06:09 PM.*

Sep 30, 2004, 11:56 PM	#6
rikit_zap Guest Posts: n/a (0/day)	Thanks Viper. Fixed now...

Oct 1, 2004, 03:28 PM	#7
pablofrogo Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Lytham... in England Posts: 180 (0.06/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	I'm going to run the game tests again, they look so good __________________ AMD Athlon XP-M 2400+ @ 200*11 Abit NF-7S v2.0 1Gb Corsair VS PC3200 RAM @ (2.5-3-3-11) Leadtek A400 6800GT Creative Audigy 2 Seagate Barracuda 120gb 7200.7 2x Maxtor 5400RPM HDD

Oct 1, 2004, 08:23 PM	#8
Slayerstaps Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Noord-Brabant,The Netherlands Posts: 260 (0.08/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	pfff crap scores....25 with 4.6 catalyst 27 with 4.9 catalyst. __________________ Asus A8N-SLI Premium AMD 64 3500+ Newcastle @ 10x250 2x 80 gig Western Digital 2 Gig PC3200 Corsair Value Asus 7900GTX 512 MB @ stock

Oct 1, 2004, 08:57 PM	#9
Frozen Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: US Posts: 115 (0.04/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	I refuse to even run these any more

Oct 3, 2004, 05:52 AM	#11
15th Warlock Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: California, U.S.A. Posts: 1,984 (0.62/day) Thanks: 549 Thanked 510 Times in 215 Posts System Specs	2343 That's less than the score I got at 3Dmark01 with my GeForce 256 SDR 3 years ago __________________ Main Rig: See System Specs HTPC Game room: Ci7 SB 2600K@4.5Ghz - Asus ROG Maximus IV Gene-Z - EVGA 2xGTX680s SLI - 4x4GBs GSkill Ripjaws - 2x120GBs Vertex 3MIOPS - OCZ 1.25 kW PSU HTPC Bedroom: C2Q Q9550@3.4Ghz - Asus ROG Striker II - EVGA 2xGTX680s SLI - 2x4GBs Kingston HyperX - 2x120GBs Agility 3 - SB Recon3D - Silverstone 1 kW PSU Lappy: Samsung Series 7 NP700G7C - Ci7 IVB 3610QM@2.3~3.3Ghz - 17.3" 1920x1080 120 Hz - GeForce GTX675M - 16GBs 1600Mhz RAM - 512GBs Crucial M4 - 6X BluRay

System Name:	Project Crimson Titan
Processor:	SB-E Core i7 3930K 4.5Ghz@1.31V Vcore
Motherboard:	Asus ROG Rampage IV Extreme
Cooling:	CPU: Corsair H100 push and pull, RAM: 2xCorsair Airflow, VGA: EK full coverage WBs
Memory:	4x4GBs Corsair Vengeance XMP 1866MHz @ 1.5V
Video Card:	2x EVGA GTX Titan SC in SLI
Hard Disk:	OS: 2x128GBs OCZ Vertex 4 RAID 0/Games: 2x1.5TBs WDC Black RAID 0
Optical Drive:	Lite-On 12X Blu-ray Burner
CRT/LCD Model:	3x27" Acer 120Hz 3D HN274 LED LCDs @ 5760x1080 - Nvidia 3D Vision Surround
Case:	Cooler Master HAF X - Zalman MCF2 Fan Controller
Sound Card:	SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Pro on Logitech THX Z-5500 5.1/Razer Tiamat 7.1 Headset
PSU:	Silvestone ST1500 1.5 kW
Software:	Windows 8 Pro 64bit

Oct 3, 2004, 03:40 PM	#14
15th Warlock Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: California, U.S.A. Posts: 1,984 (0.62/day) Thanks: 549 Thanked 510 Times in 215 Posts System Specs	Guess I was under the influence last night, I was wrong about the score I got, I checked it this morning, and I got 2422, not 2343, I'm not lying, you can check the date at the project's URL. But in any case, do you think that's too low for my vidcard? I'm running on a WinXP SP2 OS tweaked for speed (by that I mean, my OS doesn't load all the crappy services or background programs) and using the new beta 4.11 Catalysts. P.S. Kids, my advice is that you shouldn't post your scores while you're drunk __________________ Main Rig: See System Specs HTPC Game room: Ci7 SB 2600K@4.5Ghz - Asus ROG Maximus IV Gene-Z - EVGA 2xGTX680s SLI - 4x4GBs GSkill Ripjaws - 2x120GBs Vertex 3MIOPS - OCZ 1.25 kW PSU HTPC Bedroom: C2Q Q9550@3.4Ghz - Asus ROG Striker II - EVGA 2xGTX680s SLI - 2x4GBs Kingston HyperX - 2x120GBs Agility 3 - SB Recon3D - Silverstone 1 kW PSU Lappy: Samsung Series 7 NP700G7C - Ci7 IVB 3610QM@2.3~3.3Ghz - 17.3" 1920x1080 120 Hz - GeForce GTX675M - 16GBs 1600Mhz RAM - 512GBs Crucial M4 - 6X BluRay

Oct 3, 2004, 06:07 PM	#15
d_o_n Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2 (0.00/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	I got finally 5404 points. with my x800 pro @ xt 526/573 and a P4 3 Ghz.

Oct 3, 2004, 09:11 PM	#17
pablofrogo Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Lytham... in England Posts: 180 (0.06/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	I don't get why you run it and look.. Look for atrifacts? or just look at the pretty colours (I do that, especially Proxycon )? __________________ AMD Athlon XP-M 2400+ @ 200*11 Abit NF-7S v2.0 1Gb Corsair VS PC3200 RAM @ (2.5-3-3-11) Leadtek A400 6800GT Creative Audigy 2 Seagate Barracuda 120gb 7200.7 2x Maxtor 5400RPM HDD

Oct 4, 2004, 06:01 AM	#18
Slayerstaps Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Noord-Brabant,The Netherlands Posts: 260 (0.08/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	I look at the nice new technology that is usable for games nowadays. Although they don use it cause only some pc's can run those games at decent framerates..... In my opinion 3dmark is more of a tech demo for new graphic technology and such...more of a look in the future to see how nice games are gonna look then __________________ Asus A8N-SLI Premium AMD 64 3500+ Newcastle @ 10x250 2x 80 gig Western Digital 2 Gig PC3200 Corsair Value Asus 7900GTX 512 MB @ stock

Oct 4, 2004, 07:35 AM	#19
ati.bob Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: 3rd Rock from the Sun Posts: 325 (0.10/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	Slayerstaps's right.. 3Dmark is basically a demo that "over-stresses" some of the latest graphic fireworks that PC can generate.. It's not actually (read: not really) the performance you get on games unless those games that demand all the visual decorations to be turned on (really rare)..

Oct 4, 2004, 09:55 AM	#20
nczhivago Guest Posts: n/a (0/day)	oh my card is just 855 with sempron 2600 and 9550 128m

Oct 4, 2004, 10:11 AM	#21
MikBach Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 9 (0.00/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts	9800PRO 256 MB 380/340 Cat 4.9 VGA 2445 G1 9,7 fps G2 7,1 fps G3 13,5 fps Cat 4.11 VGA 2722 G1 12,9 fps G2 7,5 fps G3 13,3 fps 420/340 VGA 2922 460/360 VGA 3180

Oct 4, 2004, 08:29 PM	#24
Xylitol Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: San Diego Posts: 3 (0.00/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	6,300 __________________ AMD Athlon 64 3400+(2.6GHZ) Asus K8N-E Corsair 1GB pc3200 Western Digital2 74 GB Raptors in Raid 0 Asus AX800 XT PE (555/615) 3dMark03 Score: 13,104 3dMark05 Score: 6300

Oct 5, 2004, 08:00 PM	#25
pablofrogo Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Lytham... in England Posts: 180 (0.06/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	Update: With cats 4.11 I get 3170 __________________ AMD Athlon XP-M 2400+ @ 200*11 Abit NF-7S v2.0 1Gb Corsair VS PC3200 RAM @ (2.5-3-3-11) Leadtek A400 6800GT Creative Audigy 2 Seagate Barracuda 120gb 7200.7 2x Maxtor 5400RPM HDD

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Very Low 3dmark05 scores 4000's????	Yay4Juggs	Graphics Cards	57	Jul 13, 2007 03:49 PM
Low 3dMark05 scores 5.3k	InfDamarvel	Graphics Cards	16	Jan 7, 2007 12:08 AM
3Dmark05 scores	overclocker	Graphics Cards	44	Sep 11, 2006 06:43 PM
ATi Radeon X800 GTO w/ BAD 3DMark05 Scores	error_f0rce	Graphics Cards	10	Jun 23, 2006 12:46 PM
post your X1600 pro 3Dmark05 scores	nick_1992	Graphics Cards	4	May 21, 2006 05:26 PM