techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 30, 2009, 08:42 PM   #26
spearman914
2000 Posts
 
spearman914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brooklyn, New York 11223
Posts: 3,000 (1.61/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 510 Times in 482 Posts
Send a message via AIM to spearman914

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by phanbuey View Post
and they said ddr2 was dead.
DDR2 aint dead.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.


Yet....
__________________
.................................................. ..
“Originally Posted by mlee49 So pain level on a 1 to 10 scale, 10 being having a wart removed on your butthole with pliers.”
spearman914 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to spearman914 For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 30, 2009, 09:02 PM   #27
fullinfusion
1.21 Gigawatts
 
fullinfusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CANADA
Posts: 5,464 (2.79/day)
Thanks: 2,701
Thanked 1,294 Times in 1,092 Posts

System Specs

WOW!!!!! I cant wait!
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
fullinfusion is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 30, 2009, 09:40 PM   #28
1Kurgan1
The Knife in your Back
 
1Kurgan1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 6,723 (4.13/day)
Thanks: 3,098
Thanked 2,320 Times in 1,561 Posts

System Specs

Very nice, hopefully this holds some truth, me needs a 990!
__________________
1Kurgan1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 30, 2009, 09:43 PM   #29
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,027 (6.42/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,755 Times in 2,224 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

wow thats nice now what about the rumors we heard about a new FX line? maybe 4ghz stock from factory wasn't insane afterall
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cdawall For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 30, 2009, 09:50 PM   #30
Tatty_One
Senior(Citizen)Moderator
 
Tatty_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 12,751 (4.75/day)
Thanks: 1,094
Thanked 1,937 Times in 1,438 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tatty_One

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolf2009 View Post
Just a ploy to sell pricier processors and make profits like Intel does by raising the multiplier by 0.5 and sell it for $50 more.
Agreed, it's nice to see they are opening up the options and offering more power, however I fear that in the higher end chips, they will simply destroy any price performance advantage they have, of course i dont know the prices but I would guess we will see at least $50 between models.
__________________

Last edited by Tatty_One; Jan 31, 2009 at 09:08 AM.
Tatty_One is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 30, 2009, 10:00 PM   #31
PCpraiser100
1000 Posts
 
PCpraiser100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,059 (0.60/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 68 Times in 61 Posts

System Specs

Finally, its just lke back in the Pentium days eh? 3.8GHz processors, just thinking about going back to the good ol' idea of fequencies is just plain awesome. Hope I don't kill my AMD gaming friend who will brag over my 2.66GHz semi-octa Core i7 processor once he gets it.
PCpraiser100 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 30, 2009, 10:34 PM   #32
fullinfusion
1.21 Gigawatts
 
fullinfusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CANADA
Posts: 5,464 (2.79/day)
Thanks: 2,701
Thanked 1,294 Times in 1,092 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdawall View Post
wow thats nice now what about the rumors we heard about a new FX line? maybe 4ghz stock from factory wasn't insane afterall
Great point but imo i think with AMD upping the clocks....... it's just going to lower the over all clock that all of us are expecting to get.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
fullinfusion is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to fullinfusion For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 30, 2009, 10:41 PM   #33
FreedomEclipse
Crazy Dogmatic Bullsh!t!
 
FreedomEclipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: (British Born Chinese) London, United Kingdom
Posts: 7,533 (3.38/day)
Thanks: 825
Thanked 1,609 Times in 1,288 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tcorbyn View Post
NICE! Would be great if AMD could put out somthing to compete with Core i7!
Heres to wishing

Ive been reading quite a few reviews reguarding the X4 940BE & there still people comparing it to the C2D Q6600 & saying the Q6600 beats it hands down for price & overclockability etc etc....
__________________

“I used to be a serial upgrader like you, then i took a downgrade to the knee” -FreedomEclipse
FreedomEclipse is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 30, 2009, 10:48 PM   #34
Melvis
2000 Posts
 
Melvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,932 (1.55/day)
Thanks: 606
Thanked 459 Times in 381 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdawall View Post
wow thats nice now what about the rumors we heard about a new FX line? maybe 4ghz stock from factory wasn't insane afterall
mmmmm indeed, thats what im looking out for is the new FX Line up I love my FX's
I wonder if they will tell us this time there secret ingredient?
Melvis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2009, 12:24 AM   #35
mlee49
Eligible for custom title
 
mlee49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: KU
Posts: 6,921 (3.50/day)
Thanks: 1,598
Thanked 2,049 Times in 1,602 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to mlee49

System Specs

This might actually get me to consider AMD for my next build!
__________________
mlee49 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2009, 12:49 AM   #36
fullinfusion
1.21 Gigawatts
 
fullinfusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CANADA
Posts: 5,464 (2.79/day)
Thanks: 2,701
Thanked 1,294 Times in 1,092 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Melvis View Post
mmmmm indeed, thats what im looking out for is the new FX Line up I love my FX's
I wonder if they will tell us this time there secret ingredient?
Fx.... FX and how long have they been talking about the FX line?

I wouldn't hold my breath mate..... and even if they do come out with a Fx line.... and they been talking about it for month's i highly doubt it'll be over clock able by much
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
fullinfusion is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2009, 12:52 AM   #37
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.98/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

This is wonderful news. About time they start cranking it out. I noticed in the last Maximum PC magazine that they took out like 8 - 10 pages of ads showing off the new phenoms combined with the 4000 series of cards and what not.
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2009, 01:02 AM   #38
LittleLizard
2000 Posts
 
LittleLizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Latin America, Uruguay
Posts: 3,380 (2.06/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 584 Times in 516 Posts

System Specs

if that is phenom II clocks i cant imagine the stock speeds of the phenom fx ( if they came out )
__________________


"oh no, i make a very good person. I eat poop and sleep just like everyone else.
My sense of humour just happens to fall under the DnD category of Chaotic Evil." - Mussels
"I was expecting a line of EVGA FTW condoms or something like that." - DrPepper
"I like my sex like my basketball, one on one, and with as little dribbling as possible" - Robert-The-Rambler
LittleLizard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2009, 01:23 AM   #39
trickson
OH, I have such a headache
 
trickson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 6,105 (1.97/day)
Thanks: 1,863
Thanked 896 Times in 746 Posts

System Specs

Smacks of what Intel did to the P4 remember ? They just kept cranking the speed up just to keep up and every one dogged Intel out for this now that AMD is doing the very same thing you Hypocrites are saying WOW , GREAT and OMG that is FANTASTIC !!! Holly carp people if this is the best they have up there sleeves then why not call it like you did when Intel was tapping the P4 out for all it was worth ? Why is it great and fantastic when AMD does this and provides no other real innovations other than to clock the shit out of there old crap and sell it off to you ?

Last edited by trickson; Jan 31, 2009 at 01:28 AM.
trickson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2009, 01:37 AM   #40
[I.R.A]_FBi
Eligible for custom title
 
[I.R.A]_FBi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: c:\programs\kitteh.exe
Posts: 6,152 (2.80/day)
Thanks: 724
Thanked 556 Times in 461 Posts

System Specs

sneaky buggers
__________________
Rig 1+1
Athlon XP 2200+, MSI KM2M Combo, ATI 9200SE 128 MB DDR, 2 X 512 MB DDR333, 250GB + 80 HDD?

“try intel cpu, amd is only good for going to nude sites” -firehawkxd
“go for the 5850 now and play games while the nvidiots wait for the ceo to show an actual working product” -W1zzard
“An MSI logo? This offends my retina. I await your apology.” -MRCL

www.autolounge.com.jm
[I.R.A]_FBi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2009, 01:43 AM   #41
trickson
OH, I have such a headache
 
trickson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 6,105 (1.97/day)
Thanks: 1,863
Thanked 896 Times in 746 Posts

System Specs

What really get me is the fact that the Phenom II can OC well past that 3.5GHz mark and still can not hold a candle to the Q9550 when it is OC'ed as well . What gets me is that you eat this up like it is some new tech ... This is just cranking the shit out of the CPU then selling it back to you at a higher price when you can Over Clock the 920 to 940 speeds and get the same performance for a lesser price . Does this really make any sense to any one ? Do you think that since you can get a 3.5GHz CPU that you will get any more out of it than you can with the current clocked Phenom II's ? If so how do you figure this ? If the CPU can reach 6GHz ON STOCK AIR COOLING now that would be some thing but come on this is just smoke and mirrors here !

Last edited by trickson; Jan 31, 2009 at 01:51 AM.
trickson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2009, 01:51 AM   #42
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,763 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,119 Times in 3,709 Posts

System Specs

Wonderful! I hope they keep the prices down, like under the $400 mark.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2009, 01:57 AM   #43
trickson
OH, I have such a headache
 
trickson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 6,105 (1.97/day)
Thanks: 1,863
Thanked 896 Times in 746 Posts

System Specs

# Process Type: Intel Pentium 4 Processor 640
# Frequence: 3.20 GHz
# FSB: 800 MHz
# Cache: 2 MB
# Process: 90 nm
# Socket: LGA775
# Package: OEM
# This processor includes Hyper-Threading Technology.
# This processor supports Intel® Extended Memory 64 Technology (EM64T).

Seems like Intel beat them to the Clock speed way back when now AMD is doing it but It is all wonderful and exciting !

Oh for the good old days ... Suck it it people this is going to be the theme for the next 2-3 years for AMD CLOCK UP UP UP FASTER WE NEED TO CATCH UP !!!!
trickson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2009, 02:05 AM   #44
KainXS
3500 Posts
 
KainXS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,699 (2.27/day)
Thanks: 186
Thanked 466 Times in 383 Posts

System Specs

AMD needs to make a cpu that can compete clock for clock with intels right now, its not like it was with the Athlon XP's and the Pentium 4's, AMD is falling behind more and more, I got a chance to put my sisters new Phenom X4 against my Core i7 and my core i7 beat it clock for clock really badly.

Things have changed, now AMD is in the position Intel was in the Pentium VS Athlon gen since the X2's came out, they need something more than this to truly compete.

they're lucky ATI is now part of AMD,
KainXS is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2009, 02:09 AM   #45
trickson
OH, I have such a headache
 
trickson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 6,105 (1.97/day)
Thanks: 1,863
Thanked 896 Times in 746 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by KainXS View Post
AMD needs to make a cpu that can compete clock for clock with intels right now, its not like it was with the Athlon XP's and the Pentium 4's, AMD is falling behind more and more, I got a chance to put my sisters new Phenom X4 against my Core i7 and my core i7 beat it clock for clock really badly.
LOL that is funny and just how is Clocking the HELL out of the current or even AM3 CPU going to do any good ? I just don't see it . maybe they will catch up to the Q9550 and Q9650 but man just raising the clock speed is not going to do shit . Just look at the ones that are already at 4.0GHz most can't even get past that and even at them speeds what do you really gain ? SMOKE AND MIRRORS . They will get them out and what is funny is that AMD heads will be buying them up and fast to !
trickson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2009, 02:14 AM   #46
ShadowFold
Eligible for custom title
 
ShadowFold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 12,855 (6.49/day)
Thanks: 1,381
Thanked 1,681 Times in 1,498 Posts
Send a message via MSN to ShadowFold Send a message via Skype™ to ShadowFold

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by trickson View Post
LOL that is funny and just how is Clocking the HELL out of the current or even AM3 CPU going to do any good ? I just don't see it . maybe they will catch up to the Q9550 and Q9650 but man just raising the clock speed is not going to do shit . Just look at the ones that are already at 4.0GHz most can't even get past that and even at them speeds what do you really gain ? SMOKE AND MIRRORS . They will get them out and what is funny is that AMD heads will be buying them up and fast to !
DOWN WITH AMD! Intel needs to be a monopoly!!
ShadowFold is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2009, 02:21 AM   #47
KainXS
3500 Posts
 
KainXS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,699 (2.27/day)
Thanks: 186
Thanked 466 Times in 383 Posts

System Specs

I hope amd never goes down then we all know intel would rape our pockets just like nvidia did during the 8800GTX's dynasty.
KainXS is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2009, 02:24 AM   #48
trickson
OH, I have such a headache
 
trickson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 6,105 (1.97/day)
Thanks: 1,863
Thanked 896 Times in 746 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadowFold View Post
DOWN WITH AMD! Intel needs to be a monopoly!!
YEAH !! Hey why is it ok for AMD to do this when Intel was getting nothing but smeared and pissed on for doing this ? When AMD does this ( Because they have nothing els left to do ) you Hypocrites eat it up and fawn all over AMD like the second coming of Christ !
What is wrong with me telling it like it really is ? I am dogging AMD for this because it is JUST what Intel did with there LAME ASS P4 to keep up with AMD's XP and Athlon now that the shoe is on the other foot I well thought that it would be fine to jeer and jab and knock AMD for this after all fare is fare . OH and AMD is not going down just trying to keep up and clocking the hell out of the CPU seemed to work well for Intel so I guess AMD is going to give it a shot now .
trickson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2009, 02:27 AM   #49
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.11/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,526 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by trickson View Post
Smacks of what Intel did to the P4 remember ? They just kept cranking the speed up just to keep up and every one dogged Intel out for this now that AMD is doing the very same thing you Hypocrites are saying WOW , GREAT and OMG that is FANTASTIC !!! Holly carp people if this is the best they have up there sleeves then why not call it like you did when Intel was tapping the P4 out for all it was worth ? Why is it great and fantastic when AMD does this and provides no other real innovations other than to clock the shit out of there old crap and sell it off to you ?
Actual it's really not the same. The P4's higher number of stage pipeline (IE: netburst) is what allowed for the higher overclocks. AMD doesn't share the same design therefore, won't see (IMO) the higher clocks shared by those prescotts of that era. Also, take notice to what you recall from the P4 series. Not that it was a hot oven but a good overclocker. Something that some do take interest in. I remember having a 660 back in the day that was 4.20Ghz stable 24/7. Something not common for A64's.



Did this overclock offest anything AMD offered during it's time. IE: offset the reduced number of instructions per cycle? You betcha at 4.2GHz I was just as fast (and usually faster during encoding/watching HD quality moves) then AMD's counterpart during it's time.
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2009, 02:30 AM   #50
trickson
OH, I have such a headache
 
trickson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 6,105 (1.97/day)
Thanks: 1,863
Thanked 896 Times in 746 Posts

System Specs

Yeah but clock for clock the A64 was faster and even maxed out the A64's could take out the best of Intel's P4 . I remember my 4000+ doing that bench in 24 -25 at 2.8GHz .
trickson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD and ATIC of Abu Dhabi to Create New Semiconductor Manufacturing Company malware News 49 Oct 10, 2008 10:59 AM
New Enthusiast Products from AMD Command Strong Ecosystem Support malware News 8 Nov 20, 2007 06:19 PM
ScienceMark thread (with score list) _33 Overclocking & Cooling 2736 Aug 25, 2007 09:19 PM
AMD Names the Next PC Computing Thrill Ride: The AMD Phenom Processor malware News 23 May 21, 2007 11:59 PM
System Builder's Guide 2006 djbbenn Articles 37 Aug 25, 2006 02:47 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts