techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Storage

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Feb 14, 2009, 10:01 PM   #1
Baer
75 Posts
 
Baer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: California, on the BEACH
Posts: 86 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

Optical Drives, SATA or IDE?

What do you guys recommend? I have 6 SATA slots on my Mobo and I will be installing three HDDs initially. I may install a SSD drive later so that would be 4. I am trying to decide if I want to use IDE and save my two additional SATA slots. I am going to install two optical drives. I am not very concerned about a little more burn speed for the optical drives as they are not used that often.
Comments and Suggestions?
Tnx
Baer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14, 2009, 10:02 PM   #2
Kursah
Eligible for custom title
 
Kursah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Missoula, Montana, USA
Posts: 6,558 (2.72/day)
Thanks: 727
Thanked 1,349 Times in 1,118 Posts

System Specs

I use SATA anymore, the last two Samsung SATA DVD burners I got performed flawlessly, quickly and with the smaller, thinner cables, the cable management was a lot easier. PATA/IDE burners still get the job done just fine though, it depends on what you find for how much, I use Lite-On and Samsung mostly. The SATA burners I got were around 25 shipped on newegg.

Kursah is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14, 2009, 10:07 PM   #3
oli_ramsay
2000 Posts
 
oli_ramsay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,679 (1.30/day)
Thanks: 577
Thanked 592 Times in 450 Posts
Send a message via MSN to oli_ramsay

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursah View Post
I use SATA anymore, the last two Samsung SATA DVD burners I got performed flawlessly, quickly and with the smaller, thinner cables, the cable management was a lot easier. PATA/IDE burners still get the job done just fine though, it depends on what you find for how much, I use Lite-On and Samsung mostly. The SATA burners I got were around 25 shipped on newegg.

What he said. Most newer boards, like x58 don't even have IDE connectors on them any more so it would be wise to go SATA to be more futureproof.
oli_ramsay is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14, 2009, 10:07 PM   #4
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
 
FordGT90Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,574 (6.29/day)
Thanks: 1,752
Thanked 2,596 Times in 1,960 Posts

System Specs

If I plan to use RAID on a SATA controller, I put PATA optical drives in. If I don't intend to use RAID, I go all SATA.

The only real difference is PATA will be on the chopping block sooner or later. A SATA drive therefore may have a longer useful life but considering they're pretty cheap, it's really not something to ponder for long.
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume.

try { SteamDownload(); }
catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); }
FordGT90Concept is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14, 2009, 10:16 PM   #5
Kursah
Eligible for custom title
 
Kursah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Missoula, Montana, USA
Posts: 6,558 (2.72/day)
Thanks: 727
Thanked 1,349 Times in 1,118 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by FordGT90Concept View Post
If I plan to use RAID on a SATA controller, I put PATA optical drives in. If I don't intend to use RAID, I go all SATA.

The only real difference is PATA will be on the chopping block sooner or later. A SATA drive therefore may have a longer useful life but considering they're pretty cheap, it's really not something to ponder for long.
I'm running RAID 0 on my current setup with SATA DVDR. I have 2 WD400 SATA II drives in Raid 0, a WD6400AAKS SE16 SATA II and one Samsung S203 DVD SATA and have had no issues at all. This is on my P5Q Deluxe, which I believe has ICH10R iirc. Though I do have the JMicron SATA/IDE if need-be.

So far ALL SATA + SATA RAID on the Intel chipset has been solid, this has been my first all-sata + raid setup and I gotta say it's worked amazingly!

Kursah is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kursah For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 15, 2009, 02:02 AM   #6
Baer
75 Posts
 
Baer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: California, on the BEACH
Posts: 86 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

Thanks, when I did my last build a few years back SATA burners were not playing nice all the time. I think I will go SATA if for no other reason than the smaller cables and being able to set IDE seaqrch time in the BIOS to 0.
Thanks again.
Baer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 15, 2009, 02:06 AM   #7
J-Man
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Oakham, UK
Posts: 2,035 (0.93/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 83 Times in 81 Posts
Send a message via MSN to J-Man

System Specs

IDE is old now, SATA you want. Like Kursah stated, SATA data cables are thinner and the power cables are also so much easier to hide away behind the tray and looks a lot tidy.
J-Man is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 15, 2009, 04:35 PM   #8
Baer
75 Posts
 
Baer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: California, on the BEACH
Posts: 86 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

Yes, that was my decision factor. My reluctance was that I did not want to use all six of my SATA ports right away but that is the way it is I guess.
Baer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 15, 2009, 04:50 PM   #9
ArmoredCavalry
500 Posts
 
ArmoredCavalry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 572 (0.29/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 74 Times in 55 Posts

System Specs

Definitely go with SATA. I got an IDE optical drive with my original rig, before I knew about the existence of SATA optical drives.

IDE cables, even the rounded one I picked up are horrible for cable management. I would just buy a SATA drive now, but I'm too cheap for that.
ArmoredCavalry is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 15, 2009, 05:40 PM   #10
Jizzler
2000 Posts
 
Jizzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts

System Specs

SATA!

I've been IDE free since the first SATA opticals hit the market (Plextor).
Jizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 15, 2009, 07:51 PM   #11
hat
Maximum Overclocker
 
hat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12,236 (5.16/day)
Thanks: 2,054
Thanked 2,039 Times in 1,549 Posts

System Specs

I have all SATA drives. I didn't notice any more speed from my optical drives (because of mechanical limitations, optical drives will never be able to put out enough data to fill the IDE bus anyway), but I like having a little SATA cable tucked away somewhere instead of having some 2 inch wide IDE cable blocking my cpu heatsink's airflow
__________________
My Heatware
“Inb4 smartphone LN2 overclocking.” -radrok
hat is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Plextor Announces New Lineup of Blu-Ray and DVD-RW Optical Drives malware News 5 Nov 25, 2008 08:22 AM
WD Launches New RE3 SATA Enterprise Hard Drives malware News 3 Jun 20, 2008 11:44 PM
SteelSeries Ikari Optical Frederik S Reviews 2 May 23, 2008 06:28 PM
Sata is runnning in IDE mode? jbunch07 Storage 11 Apr 17, 2008 02:00 AM
System Builder's Guide 2006 djbbenn Articles 37 Aug 25, 2006 02:47 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts