techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 6, 2009, 12:11 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,984 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

ATI M97 Already Using 5 GT/s GDDR5 Memory, Highest Memory Bandwidth for Any mGPU

In an interesting observation, it has come to light that AMD's soon to be released ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4860 MXM modules will carry the industry's fastest 5 GT/s GDDR5 memory chips made by Qimonda. From the part name on the chips, IDGV1G-05A1F1C-50X. One can infer "50X" to be the bandwidth per pin at reference speeds: 5 GT/s (5 GB/s in one direction). Across the 128-bit wide memory bus the M97 HD 4860 has, the chips can churn-out a staggering 80 GB/s memory bandwidth, never before seen on any mGPU board. In comparison, NVIDIA's G92b-based GeForce GTX 280M delivers 60.08 GB/s and AMD's own M98 RV770-based Mobility Radeon HD 4850 doles-out 56.8 GB/s.

The 5 GT/s GDDR5 chips are yet to be used by AMD in its desktop products. Development cycles have gone as far as including "40X" (4 GT/s) memory chips labeled IDGV1G-05A1F1C-40X on company-internal RV790 samples. Another DRAM major, Hynix had announced its plans to introduce 7 GT/s GDDR5 chips back in November 2008. The company is known to commence volume production of the 7 GT/s chip by the end of Q2 2009.



Source: GPU Café

Last edited by btarunr; Mar 6, 2009 at 12:22 AM.
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 12:40 AM   #2
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
 
DrPepper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.28/day)
Thanks: 977
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
Send a message via MSN to DrPepper Send a message via Skype™ to DrPepper

System Specs

I want a lappy with one of these babies in it
DrPepper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 12:50 AM   #3
Urbklr
1000 Posts
 
Urbklr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Truro, NS Canada
Posts: 1,864 (0.85/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 245 Times in 214 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Urbklr Send a message via MSN to Urbklr

System Specs

I want one of these in my netbook...

That would be sweet.
__________________
Urbklr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 01:20 AM   #4
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,773 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,123 Times in 3,712 Posts

System Specs

I can't wait for these(or any GDDR5) to start finding their way into mid-range desktop cards.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 01:57 AM   #5
mechtech
200 Posts
 
mechtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: canada, northern ontario, way up in the sticks
Posts: 250 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts

System Specs

I want one of these in my desktop!! I guess an adaptor would'nt do the trick, that would probly drop the wattage that my 4850 sucks back!!!
mechtech is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 02:09 AM   #6
v12dock
1000 Posts
 
v12dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 1,286 (0.79/day)
Thanks: 281
Thanked 240 Times in 160 Posts

System Specs

Make me wanna use a laptop
v12dock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 04:42 AM   #7
BazookaJoe
500 Posts
 
BazookaJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 800 (0.46/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 207 Times in 125 Posts

AMD has been pulling all sorts of "Superior Bandwidth" nonsense for years and years but in so many cases it has all boiled down to nothing, with many of their "Superior Bandwidth" innovations performing worse than whats already been on the market in all but one or two synthetic tests.

And I should know - Ive been burned by all of that very underhanded marketing on a few processors before (And YES their theoretical bandwidth WAS better, but they still performed worse).

Effective mathematical bandwidth does NOT ALWAYS translate into performance (And can even AGGRAVATE pre-existing bottlenecks, creating buffer overruns that can actually cause entire transfer cycles to drop).

Don't get me wrong, in GFX processing , bandwidth is vital to taking full advantage of a GPU. This does indeed LOOK like good news on the surface, but I'm going to wait for the benchmarks before I begin swishing my credit-card around...

Last edited by BazookaJoe; Mar 6, 2009 at 04:52 AM.
BazookaJoe is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 05:02 AM   #8
a111087
2000 Posts
 
a111087's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: US
Posts: 2,521 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 190 Times in 157 Posts

System Specs

agree with bazooka, so what that it has more bandwith than a desktop, it perform not even anywhere near of desktop model (as a tradition goes on)
__________________
a111087 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 05:10 AM   #9
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,984 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by BazookaJoe View Post
AMD has been pulling all sorts of "Superior Bandwidth" nonsense for years and years but in so many cases it has all boiled down to nothing, with many of their "Superior Bandwidth" innovations performing worse than whats already been on the market in all but one or two synthetic tests.

And I should know - Ive been burned by all of that very underhanded marketing on a few processors before (And YES their theoretical bandwidth WAS better, but they still performed worse).

Effective mathematical bandwidth does NOT ALWAYS translate into performance (And can even AGGRAVATE pre-existing bottlenecks, creating buffer overruns that can actually cause entire transfer cycles to drop).

Don't get me wrong, in GFX processing , bandwidth is vital to taking full advantage of a GPU. This does indeed LOOK like good news on the surface, but I'm going to wait for the benchmarks before I begin swishing my credit-card around...
Read Guru3D's review of the RV740. It is genuinely faster than the Radeon HD 4830, and at those figures, faster than the GeForce 9800 GT.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 05:45 AM   #10
BazookaJoe
500 Posts
 
BazookaJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 800 (0.46/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 207 Times in 125 Posts

OK - Well fair enough then - Link Plz?
BazookaJoe is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 06:29 AM   #11
soryuuha
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 94 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by BazookaJoe View Post
OK - Well fair enough then - Link Plz?
http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon...-preview-test/
soryuuha is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to soryuuha For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 6, 2009, 01:11 PM   #12
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
I can't wait for these(or any GDDR5) to start finding their way into mid-range desktop cards.
Aye, that's hopefully what the 4770 is going to have (or whatever they end up calling it).
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2009, 01:32 PM   #13
BazookaJoe
500 Posts
 
BazookaJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 800 (0.46/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 207 Times in 125 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by soryuuha View Post
Ok I have to admit - that looks good - And I'm currently camping in the nVidia tent...

If ATI/AMD can keep this up it will mean great news for us consumers.

Check that review out ppl.
BazookaJoe is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2009, 08:28 AM   #14
Hayder_Master
3500 Posts
 
Hayder_Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: IRAQ-Baghdad
Posts: 4,861 (2.61/day)
Thanks: 388
Thanked 639 Times in 444 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Hayder_Master Send a message via Yahoo to Hayder_Master

System Specs

wow , i was happy when i have 8800gt have 57Gb bandwidth , now i see 80G in note book that's much
Hayder_Master is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sapphire PURE Innovation PI-A9RX480 W1zzard Reviews 11 May 8, 2009 08:46 PM
Samsung Begins Production of High-performance GDDR5 Memory Using 50-nm Technology btarunr News 26 Feb 16, 2009 06:13 PM
AMD Launches ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4000 Series Graphics for Notebooks malware News 12 Jan 11, 2009 08:41 AM
Sapphire PURE Crossfire PC-A9RD480 W1zzard Reviews 10 Dec 24, 2005 07:29 PM
DFI LanParty UT NF4 Ultra-D W1zzard Reviews 2 Oct 8, 2005 12:32 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts