techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Our Software > RealTemp

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 14, 2009, 12:22 PM   #1
Oliver_FF
200 Posts
 
Oliver_FF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 478 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 66 Times in 53 Posts

System Specs

q9400 bad sensor?

I've just built my new rig and i'm checking out the temperatures - at full load I seem to have an 8c temperature difference between one of my cores:


Would it be fair for me to assume that the other three are reporting correctly and core0 just reads high?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	realtemp.jpg
Views:	688
Size:	60.9 KB
ID:	23791  
Oliver_FF is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2009, 03:47 PM   #2
unclewebb
RealTemp Author
 
unclewebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 903 (0.49/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 394 Times in 271 Posts

What you are seeing is a difference in TJMax from one core to the next. Intel admits that TJMax is not an exact number but won't tell us how much error there is in this number. My best guess based on observation is a variation of about 10C from core to core on a 45nm Quad. The previous 65nm CPUs seem to have a closer tolerance than that.

Quote:
Would it be fair for me to assume that the other three are reporting correctly and core0 just reads high?
Unfortunately you can't really assume anything with these sensors. I'm pretty sure that core 1 has a sticking issue at a Distance to TJMax of 71. Core 2 and core 3 match nicely but that doesn't guarantee that they are actually accurate.

For an accurate cool down test you need to use the Small FFT option in Prime 95 and you need to have as little as possible in the background running. You can't be surfing the net or doing anything else while testing and with Vista you need to let it start up and settle down which can take 5 minutes or more on some systems especially after a fresh install.

For your CPU I'd leave core 2 and core 3 as is and I'd use TJMax = 105C for core 0 and then adjust the Idle Calibration factor so core 0 lines up with core 2 and core 3. I think at higher temperatures, core 1 will catch up to core 2 and core 3 so I'd leave TJMax=100C for those 3.

You could use a calibration factor on core 1 to try to balance it better with core 2 and core 3 when the temperature is above 29C (its sticking point) but it's not going to be accurate at idle because it's stuck.

An interesting comparison is from the 34% level to the Idle level. Core 0 moves 6.0 degrees, core 1 only 0.7 degrees, core 2 and core 3 are both 4.4 degrees. Core 0 vs core 2/core 3 shows the difference in slope of the temperature curves Core 1 barely moving helps confirm that it is stuck.
unclewebb is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Razer Lachesis Frederik S Reviews 30 Dec 10, 2011 05:06 AM
Kuma overclocking thread cdawall Overclocking & Cooling 469 Apr 21, 2009 04:00 PM
$1000 to Upgrade the System In My Specs OrbitzXT System Builder's Advice 22 Apr 17, 2008 04:25 PM
Micron Launches Aptina Imaging: A CMOS Image Sensor Division malware News 0 Mar 5, 2008 11:49 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts