![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,861 (4.17/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,441 Times in 3,213 Posts
|
Zotac GeForce GTX 275 Amp! Edition
To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Z...5_Amp_Edition/
Last edited by W1zzard; Apr 2, 2009 at 02:11 PM. |
|
|
|
| The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,274 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,814
Thanked 12,445 Times in 7,912 Posts
|
First GTX 275 review I've seen on the net!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The Watchful Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Cold North
Posts: 4,456 (2.84/day)
Thanks: 4,047
Thanked 2,993 Times in 1,575 Posts
|
And another great review by the W1zzard!
I like the overclocking potential of this card
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
|
Yep, great review Wizz. And amazing OC!
There's one thing though. Power consumption must be wrong on this sample card. I mean no way the GTX275 consumes much more than the GTX285, having less ROPs and running a tad slower. And even consumes more than the GTX295... NO WAY! I guess that vanilla numbers were taken with the Zotac card too, underclocked to stock clocks right?? This (and I mean this single one sample) Zotac card must have something wrong IMHO. The high temperatures might also be related to those abnormal power consumption figures I guess? They are too high anyway. Performance wise it seems Nvidia won this round in any case, in overclocking too (where's the easy to reach 1GHz in RV790??). I wonder how are they going to justify the GTX285 in the future though. They released this card to compete with the HD4890 and not have to lower GTX285 prices and they did won against it, but they'll have to lower the price a lot nonetheless to "compete" with their own card. Not that I didn't know it would perform almost like the GTX285. If it wasn't for the clock difference...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,032 (7.23/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,027 Times in 5,718 Posts
|
Winnar!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The Doctor is in the house
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.24/day)
Thanks: 977
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
|
I did say this would be like the 8800GT of the last series and I was right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rockhampton, Australia
Posts: 131 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
looks awesome but why does it out do the GTX 285 ?? i know its an overclock but what the hell
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Mod3rator
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 12,892 (4.76/day)
Thanks: 1,107
Thanked 1,963 Times in 1,456 Posts
|
Quote:
Fantastic review, i found another for those interested in a direct comparison with the HD4890 reference and overclocked versions, not nearly as thorough as Wiz's review but thought I would throw it in..... http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=17863&page=1
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Bird of Prey
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.94/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
|
Still the GTX 285 ought to oc more, which would have it running higher than the 275. The fact that Nvidia has a card that outperforms its higher card is simply awesome.
__________________
=-TheEagle-= ![]() http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454 “You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120 - Edited for content and clarity
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 5,011 (2.45/day)
Thanks: 1,484
Thanked 960 Times in 813 Posts
|
they didnt know what to expect from the 4890 so they released the fastest, cheapest card they could.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,058 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 2,249
Thanked 542 Times in 443 Posts
|
hey Wiz I thought the rop's were tied to memory bit on this architecture. Wouldn't that put the gtx275 at 28 rops based on the 448-bit memory? your chart has it at 32 rop's the same as the gtx285 whcih has a 512-bit mem interface.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Mod3rator
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 12,892 (4.76/day)
Thanks: 1,107
Thanked 1,963 Times in 1,456 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,861 (4.17/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,441 Times in 3,213 Posts
|
thanks, fixed
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boston Area, MA
Posts: 215 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 28 Times in 26 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
The Doctor is in the house
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.24/day)
Thanks: 977
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
|
If I can get a refund for my GTX260 I'm getting one of these.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,773 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 382 Times in 302 Posts
|
Quote:
I knew that it would beat my GTX 280, but getting so close to GTX 285 was a surprise. IMO they shot themselves in the foot, killing pretty must most of GTX 285 sales. 55nm version of GTX 280 would have been spot on with performance to HD 4890, but of course it would have had massive OC ability too, so dunno. One notch slower shader clock to 1350 instead of 1404 would have worked too.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Eligible for custom title
|
Wow. Noisey. Like a hairdryer. Shame.
Wiz... PLEASE keep an "old skool" card in there with your review. Remember people who read reviews are often (and for advertising reasons) the ones who want to upgrade NOW and are looking at their options. So the question is... what are they upgrading FROM. So just one "3" series ATI and one "7" series nV will help ground the data for these people. (INCLUDING ME )
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Overclocking Surrealism
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,065 (3.49/day)
Thanks: 948
Thanked 1,768 Times in 1,308 Posts
|
These cards are kind of cool. I'm sad that they skimped on the voltage control
295s have voltage control, come on nV!
__________________
I *UNITE* streamers and content providers on TPU! My Heatware ![]() Matias Quiet Pro (PC) / KBTalking Pro / Das Keyboard Professional S |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Fairmont, WV
Posts: 3,108 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 464
Thanked 321 Times in 297 Posts
|
well if they allowed voltage control the GTX 275 would probly best the GTX 285 even more easily. I agree nvidia definitely shot the GTX 285 sales with this release, were they really that unsure of what HD 4890 would bring? lol i couldn't see how
__________________
My Heatware |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() |
So I noticed on load, the fan noise is the loudest of any other card. Was this set to 100% or something? What were your impressions with the noise? I mean, is it really obnoxious?
When I got my 8800gt, the fan didn't kick in and make noise until it got to 100C or so. Is it possible they lowered the "kick in" temperature which is why load results in higher sound than the other cards?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kettering,Northants. UK
Posts: 2,242 (1.23/day)
Thanks: 1,718
Thanked 401 Times in 337 Posts
|
My next card.....just need to find one that performs as well but quieter
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
A redesign to fit in the same performance gap is a waste of money IMO, so they just took the GTX260 240 approach. It's cheap because probably atm the yields for that chips are as high as the ones for the GTX216, that is they get as many 28ROP+240SP chips as 28+216 ones, so it makes sense. There's no point in using those chips in the lesser card GTX260 (disabling one working TPC, 24SPs) and GTX295 demand isn't all that high compared to mid-range/performance cards. For them both are almost the same thing, a GTX280/285 with some broken parts so the most units they can exploit the better. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,773 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 382 Times in 302 Posts
|
Quote:
Those 55nm have a skimped out cooler, compared to 65nm GTX 260/280. Less pipes and less of the fins. 55nm GTX 260 already runs hotter than 65nm counter part and with this having more shaders (maybe more voltage) and a massive OC the cooler just can't cope with the heat in less RPM. I'd think the fan is exact same still than in my stock cooler and with 100% it's something that you don't really want to listen. It's much lower and gentle wooosh than 9800GTX+ @ 100% how ever. Get one of these and Accelero Xtreme and you got your self one sweet card
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to OnBoard For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#25 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,633 (3.07/day)
Thanks: 1,366
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
|
Wow you were right. nVidia wanted to disrupt the 4890 launch and they absolutely did. If it weren't so loud (meaning I'd have to buy an aftermarket cooler) I would be tempted to pick one up in place of my GTX260
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| please spam this thread | W1zzard | Comments & Feedback | 580 | Mar 11, 2009 02:25 PM |
| Leadtek GeForce GTX 260 Extreme+ 216 Shaders | W1zzard | Reviews | 15 | Dec 26, 2008 12:57 PM |
| Zotac GeForce GTX 280 Amp! Edition | W1zzard | Reviews | 55 | Jul 8, 2008 08:37 AM |
| [XF] nVIDIA ForceWare 174.93 | hicookie | NVIDIA | 33 | Jun 21, 2008 01:12 AM |
| Nvidia 175.70 beta drivers out | Solaris17 | NVIDIA | 1 | May 14, 2008 04:36 PM |