techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > General Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Apr 4, 2009, 02:54 AM   #1
-1nf1n1ty-
1000 Posts
 
-1nf1n1ty-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Winter Park
Posts: 1,562 (0.65/day)
Thanks: 247
Thanked 134 Times in 125 Posts

System Specs

what can you do with a PCI Express x4 slot?

the only thing I found interesting was that there was a PCI Express x4 to PCI Express x16 adapter I could use but the card will run at x4 so I dont think thats worth it...
-1nf1n1ty- is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2009, 03:09 AM   #2
JrRacinFan
Served 5k and counting ...
 
JrRacinFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Youngstown, OH
Posts: 16,121 (7.05/day)
Thanks: 4,149
Thanked 4,552 Times in 4,027 Posts
Send a message via AIM to JrRacinFan Send a message via Yahoo to JrRacinFan

System Specs

As most X4 slots are found on Intel chipsets, you could mod the slot slightly and use it for a CrossfireX setup. Wouldn't be the greatest for performance but would get the job done.

EDIT:

Oh and then of course you do have the ability to run 1x cards in them also.
JrRacinFan is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JrRacinFan For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 4, 2009, 03:14 AM   #3
LittleLizard
2000 Posts
 
LittleLizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Latin America, Uruguay
Posts: 3,380 (2.02/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 584 Times in 516 Posts

System Specs

raid cards, ssd drives
__________________


"oh no, i make a very good person. I eat poop and sleep just like everyone else.
My sense of humour just happens to fall under the DnD category of Chaotic Evil." - Mussels
"I was expecting a line of EVGA FTW condoms or something like that." - DrPepper
"I like my sex like my basketball, one on one, and with as little dribbling as possible" - Robert-The-Rambler
LittleLizard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2009, 03:14 AM   #4
Steevo
Eligible for custom title
 
Steevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,578 (2.00/day)
Thanks: 239
Thanked 983 Times in 732 Posts

System Specs

Most cards don't truly need a X16 slot. We just fool ourselves into believing that we do.
__________________

“it would have been perfect....its got trains and the line"tech your kids not to do what iv done"(or similar) because i had obviously done something to warrent 2 e-thugs to come 4000miles out of their way and kill me.” -Solaris17
“yeah i failed. i noticed the "coming soon" part after i posted.” -Mussels
“people are just stupid.” -W1zzard
Yes I am evil, yes you can have some.
Steevo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2009, 06:42 AM   #5
Yukikaze
2000 Posts
 
Yukikaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 2,121 (1.23/day)
Thanks: 213
Thanked 481 Times in 347 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by -1nf1n1ty- View Post
the only thing I found interesting was that there was a PCI Express x4 to PCI Express x16 adapter I could use but the card will run at x4 so I dont think thats worth it...
Except for the most powerful of video cards ? You can do pretty much everything with an x4 slot, and without any adapters, as well.

Plenty of boards with x4 slots have them open ended, so a x16 card will fit just fine (and work at x4). So HDTV tuners, RAID controllers, cards for PhysX, video cards to drive more monitors, sound cards, 10Gbit Ethernet (don't ask me why, though...lol)....

And when a card doesn't fit....well, there's the violent way described in my sig
__________________
Cameron: Core i7 2600K 4.5Ghz, MCR220, 2xMCR120, MCP655, ASRock P67 Extreme4, 4GB DDR3, 2xOCZ Vertex 30GB RAID0, GTX470, 2xHD5670, Modu82+ 625W, TT Xaser VI.
Neuromancer: Core i7 975, DFI DK X58-T3eH6, 12GB DDR3 1333Mhz CL6-6-6-15-1T, 3x9600GSO 384MB, Hiper 880W, TT Xaser VI.
Administrator of a 40 core Hadoop cluster.
Yukikaze is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2009, 07:40 AM   #6
-1nf1n1ty-
1000 Posts
 
-1nf1n1ty-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Winter Park
Posts: 1,562 (0.65/day)
Thanks: 247
Thanked 134 Times in 125 Posts

System Specs

interesting.......i wouldnt mind a sound card but.....i have on board sound so i may sell my xfi sound card just so i have room to crossfire maybe use the money i get from it to invest in the pcie x1 creative sound card ha!
-1nf1n1ty- is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2009, 11:11 AM   #7
francis511
2000 Posts
 
francis511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.Ireland
Posts: 2,363 (0.97/day)
Thanks: 145
Thanked 277 Times in 257 Posts

System Specs

An x1 card will work just fine, like an x-fi card for example ?
__________________
francis511 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2009, 11:23 AM   #8
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
 
DrPepper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.24/day)
Thanks: 977
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
Send a message via MSN to DrPepper Send a message via Skype™ to DrPepper

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steevo View Post
Most cards don't truly need a X16 slot. We just fool ourselves into believing that we do.
Yeah they do, My GTX260 in the 4x slot was incredibly slow compared to x16.
DrPepper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2009, 11:47 AM   #9
Error 404
1000 Posts
 
Error 404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Australia
Posts: 1,330 (0.70/day)
Thanks: 166
Thanked 178 Times in 157 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Error 404

System Specs

It depends; is your PCI-E 4x slot version 1.1 or version 2.0? If its version 2.0 then you should be able to run anything up to a 9600 GT in it without any bottlenecking, as thats about as good as a PCI-E x8 1.1 slot. You could use it for a PhysX card, but first I'd upgrade your 8800 GTS if you ever decide to do that.
__________________
Third rig: PC Express Invader. C2D E6400 2.13GHz, 4GB DDR2-800, 320GB HDD, Intel 945, Asus 9600GT 512MB, 550W PSU, W7 HP 64-bit.
Fourth Rig: Dell Optiplex 170L, P4 Prescott 2.8GHz, 512MB DDR266RAM, 80GB HDD, FX5200PCI 128MB, 250W PSU,XP Pro
Fifth rig (Laptop): Dell Inspiron 4000, 14.1", PIII 850MHz, 384MB RAM, 9.3GB, XP Pro. Now with passive cooling!

“I could make a better looking computer case with a bucket of Lincoln Logs.” -lemode
Error 404 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2009, 12:39 PM   #10
DanTheBanjoman
Seņor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.56/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steevo View Post
Most cards don't truly need a X16 slot. We just fool ourselves into believing that we do.
A 8800 is severely bottlenecked at x4. Toms hardware tested that like 2 years ago.
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2009, 12:57 PM   #11
Yukikaze
2000 Posts
 
Yukikaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 2,121 (1.23/day)
Thanks: 213
Thanked 481 Times in 347 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanTheBanjoman View Post
A 8800 is severely bottlenecked at x4. Toms hardware tested that like 2 years ago.
From Tom's testing on PCI-E 2.0 scaling it is clear that PCI-E x8 (or PCI-E 2.0 x4) is quite sufficient (depending on the title) for something like the HD3850. So the HD4670 and 9600GT would also run decent on that. Same testing also showed that the 9800GX2 could run at PCI-E 2.0 x4, and in their testing only games which already produced very high framerates (above 60 fps) and Flight Simulator X were severely affected at that bandwidth. In the end it really comes down to the application running, but plenty of cards, especially the ones most common out there (after all, the average video card is far below a GTX260), would run just fine on a PCI-E 2.0 x4 slot.
__________________
Cameron: Core i7 2600K 4.5Ghz, MCR220, 2xMCR120, MCP655, ASRock P67 Extreme4, 4GB DDR3, 2xOCZ Vertex 30GB RAID0, GTX470, 2xHD5670, Modu82+ 625W, TT Xaser VI.
Neuromancer: Core i7 975, DFI DK X58-T3eH6, 12GB DDR3 1333Mhz CL6-6-6-15-1T, 3x9600GSO 384MB, Hiper 880W, TT Xaser VI.
Administrator of a 40 core Hadoop cluster.
Yukikaze is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2009, 01:25 PM   #12
DanTheBanjoman
Seņor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.56/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

Most x4 slots are 1.1, not 2.0. Besides, I wouldn't settle for "quite sufficient".
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2009, 01:34 PM   #13
Yukikaze
2000 Posts
 
Yukikaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 2,121 (1.23/day)
Thanks: 213
Thanked 481 Times in 347 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanTheBanjoman View Post
Most x4 slots are 1.1, not 2.0. Besides, I wouldn't settle for "quite sufficient".
Oh, agreed on the settling part (I wouldn't settle for the HD3850, 9600GT or the HD4670 for gaming in the first place), just adding some input.
__________________
Cameron: Core i7 2600K 4.5Ghz, MCR220, 2xMCR120, MCP655, ASRock P67 Extreme4, 4GB DDR3, 2xOCZ Vertex 30GB RAID0, GTX470, 2xHD5670, Modu82+ 625W, TT Xaser VI.
Neuromancer: Core i7 975, DFI DK X58-T3eH6, 12GB DDR3 1333Mhz CL6-6-6-15-1T, 3x9600GSO 384MB, Hiper 880W, TT Xaser VI.
Administrator of a 40 core Hadoop cluster.
Yukikaze is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2009, 01:53 PM   #14
francis511
2000 Posts
 
francis511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.Ireland
Posts: 2,363 (0.97/day)
Thanks: 145
Thanked 277 Times in 257 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by JrRacinFan View Post
EDIT:

Oh and then of course you do have the ability to run 1x cards in them also.
Thanxx for the tip. Switched my xfi over to an x4 slot and freed up some breathing room on my gfx cooler.
__________________
francis511 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2009, 01:59 PM   #15
KainXS
3500 Posts
 
KainXS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,732 (2.26/day)
Thanks: 190
Thanked 473 Times in 389 Posts

System Specs

I actually got to test PCI-E 4X on a AsRock 4Coredual and a Gigabyte 945GZM vs a standard PCI-E 16X board with the same clocks, some people will say PCI-E 4X is not much a bottleneck but thats not true, PCI-E 4X is comparable to AGP4X not 8X, I tried both a 8800GS@800/2000/2000 and a HD3850@800/2200 and both were massively bottlenecked on both of the 4X boards, the newer the game the bigger the bottleneck and CAD apps performance are just annialited, nearly 70% performance drop on the 8800 cards I used. What I did see however is Nvidia cards get bottlenecked more than ATI cards.

Where as a HD3850@8X on AGP gets no performance hit at all, but at PCI-E4X it gets nearly a 20-30% hit.

Last edited by KainXS; Apr 4, 2009 at 02:04 PM.
KainXS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PCI express 2.0 graphics card on a PCI express mobo TylerZambori General Hardware 11 Feb 22, 2009 03:49 PM
3dfx SFFT 1.5 Driver Released btarunr News 40 Dec 2, 2008 04:11 PM
Auzentech Preps HDMI 1.3 PCI Express Audio Combo Card malware News 30 Jun 20, 2008 02:52 AM
PCIe x16 vs. x8, x4, x1 Sasqui Graphics Cards 34 Apr 2, 2007 10:47 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts