techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Apr 21, 2009, 03:04 PM   #1
W1zzard
Administrator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 11,815 (4.17/day)
Thanks: 146
Thanked 7,252 Times in 2,293 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

AMD Radeon HD 4770

To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/HD_4770/

Last edited by W1zzard; Apr 29, 2009 at 09:40 AM.
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 05:18 AM   #2
KainXS
3500 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,243 (2.65/day)
Thanks: 133
Thanked 407 Times in 329 Posts

System Specs

I was right about the heatsink, that is the reference designed heatsink but those damned partners are tryin to cash in

but its really sad they won;t be using it, it looks very good and also acts as a anti flex bar, but they went the cheap route with the POS cooler, i guess if you wanna overclock em you gotta buy you own sinks.

Last edited by KainXS; Apr 28, 2009 at 05:24 AM.
KainXS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 05:23 AM   #3
DaMulta
My stars went supernova
 
DaMulta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma T-Town
Posts: 10,329 (5.11/day)
Thanks: 1,444
Thanked 1,475 Times in 1,113 Posts

System Specs

I hope to see a CF review over these cards
__________________
ocLIT The Hardware Punishers
DaMulta is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 05:42 AM   #4
AKlass
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: MD
Posts: 283 (0.18/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts

System Specs

Woah it beats the gts250 in some games at stock..... watch out nvidia
AKlass is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 05:45 AM   #5
silkstone
1000 Posts
 
silkstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: HCM Vietnam
Posts: 1,764 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 233
Thanked 245 Times in 215 Posts

System Specs

Damn video cards are so cheap in the US. Over here that card will have a $180 price tag
__________________
Thanks to BradleyKZN for polishing my sig

“oooooooooooh fire!!! and girls...GIRLS and fire!!!!!!! oooooooooooooh *runz around clapping hands together*” -Marineborn
silkstone is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 06:15 AM   #6
aj28
200 Posts
 
aj28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 352 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 35 Times in 33 Posts

System Specs

Wow... I mean, great looking card, and I'm sure driver optimizations will make it even better, but it got beat out by the 4830 in performance per watt?! And what's all this $110 nonsense on NewEgg?? I'm sure it'll drop over the next week or so, but as it stands the 4830 is still the better buy imo.

Congrats to AMD on 40nm though. I'll bet these things are pretty cheap to make too, at least compared to its bigger brother. Looking forward to seeing what aftermarket variants the AIBs come up with...
aj28 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 07:16 AM   #7
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stationed in Florida, Home is Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,716 (3.98/day)
Thanks: 641
Thanked 583 Times in 536 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

This should be a good Card, now i wonder what would happen if the 4850/4830 are released with GDDR5
__________________
“10 years ago I was banging cheerleader left overs and defending quarterbacks. Now I get excited over a box of fans and some silicone. I'm pathetic... Mmmmmmmm six cores. Sorry I was having a Homer moment.” -TheMailMan78
“As an nVidia fanboi I give a respectful nod to you ATI creeps. This thing swallowed the 295 and farted out green abstract confetti. ATI built a monster and, judging by the benchmarks, it performs like a dream!” -EnergyFX
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 07:19 AM   #8
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,067 (8.85/day)
Thanks: 723
Thanked 9,314 Times in 4,334 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by eidairaman1 View Post
This should be a good Card, now i wonder what would happen if the 4850/4830 are released with GDDR5
Palit already has a HD 4850 with GDDR5.
__________________

జై తెలంగాణా ▒ In FF We Trust ▒
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 07:38 AM   #9
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Stationed in Florida, Home is Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,716 (3.98/day)
Thanks: 641
Thanked 583 Times in 536 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

The Sonic?
__________________
“10 years ago I was banging cheerleader left overs and defending quarterbacks. Now I get excited over a box of fans and some silicone. I'm pathetic... Mmmmmmmm six cores. Sorry I was having a Homer moment.” -TheMailMan78
“As an nVidia fanboi I give a respectful nod to you ATI creeps. This thing swallowed the 295 and farted out green abstract confetti. ATI built a monster and, judging by the benchmarks, it performs like a dream!” -EnergyFX
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 09:51 AM   #10
theorw
500 Posts
 
theorw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Athens GREECE
Posts: 702 (0.42/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 50 Times in 43 Posts

System Specs

I would SOOOOOOOOO buy a couple of them IF they CF ed with my 4850...
They are just GREAT!
theorw is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 10:58 AM   #11
nafets
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 610 (0.47/day)
Thanks: 45
Thanked 133 Times in 107 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by eidairaman1 View Post
This should be a good Card, now i wonder what would happen if the 4850/4830 are released with GDDR5
ATI already has something called the HD4870.

End of discussion.
nafets is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 12:16 PM   #12
Jizzler
2000 Posts
 
Jizzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 2,467 (1.50/day)
Thanks: 355
Thanked 455 Times in 379 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
The HD 4770 supports CrossFire configurations with two cards. I did confirm with AMD that there is no support for CrossFire triple or quad.
I didn't know they supported it on a card by card basis. Do we have a list somewhere? Or is it easy, like all 4600/4700 support two and all 4800 support up to four?
Jizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 12:26 PM   #13
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,067 (8.85/day)
Thanks: 723
Thanked 9,314 Times in 4,334 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jizzler View Post
I didn't know they supported it on a card by card basis. Do we have a list somewhere? Or is it easy, like all 4600/4700 support two and all 4800 support up to four?
That info is specific to this card.
__________________

జై తెలంగాణా ▒ In FF We Trust ▒
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 28, 2009, 12:44 PM   #14
Jizzler
2000 Posts
 
Jizzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 2,467 (1.50/day)
Thanks: 355
Thanked 455 Times in 379 Posts

System Specs

Thanks. After reading the review earlier this morning I started looking at other card reviews, AMD's website, and even the Crossfire wiki entry to see if other (newer) cards had that limitation.
Jizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 01:09 PM   #15
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,102 (2.56/day)
Thanks: 695
Thanked 866 Times in 642 Posts

System Specs

Superb price/performance and performance/watt. Silly cooler, needs replacing for something much quieter.

I'm very much tempted. nV needs to move their stuff over to 48nm, 45nm, or 40nm to get their power usage down to compete with noise and power factors.
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 02:31 PM   #16
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.36/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

Is there just no official support for tri-fire and quad-fire? Any review tested that yet? Wonder why they'd leave that out -- this thing's almost as fast as the 4850.
__________________
Win•dows: n. A thirty-two bit extension and graphical shell to a sixteen-bit patch to an eight-bit operating system originally coded for a four-bit microprocessor which was written by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition.

mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 02:32 PM   #17
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 15,651 (6.88/day)
Thanks: 676
Thanked 4,020 Times in 2,974 Posts

System Specs

Damn, outperforms the HD4830 and almost matchs an HD4850(and I'm sure it does match it once overclocked, not that the HD4850 can't be overclocked further).

Definitely looks like the card to replace my HD4670, once the release some with decent coolers on em that is. I'll wait for HIS to release the IceQ version, maybe they will just put on the second reference cooler and use that for the IceQ version...
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: Celeron E3200@4.0GHz / eVGA 780i A1 / 8GB G.Skill DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT240 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 500GB Seagate 7200.10 + 2x1.5TB Seagate LP in RAID0
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX465 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 02:33 PM   #18
W1zzard
Administrator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 11,815 (4.17/day)
Thanks: 146
Thanked 7,252 Times in 2,293 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdm-adph View Post
Is there just no official support for tri-fire and quad-fire? Any review tested that yet? Wonder why they'd leave that out -- this thing's almost as fast as the 4850.
AMD said: "By design, the 4770 is limited to two cards in CrossFireX".

why dont you go out and buy 4 of these cards and find out? amd will sure be happy about your $$$
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 02:37 PM   #19
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 15,651 (6.88/day)
Thanks: 676
Thanked 4,020 Times in 2,974 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
"By design, the 4770 is limited to two cards in CrossFireX". why dont you go out and buy 4 of these cards and find out? amd will sure be happy about your $$$
Why have two crossfire fingers on the card then? Wouldn't only one be needed for crossfire between two cards?

Did the HD4670 support more than two cards?

I mean it is all kind of pointless, since crossfiring with mid-range cards doesn't really pan out cost wise, but I'm still curious.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: Celeron E3200@4.0GHz / eVGA 780i A1 / 8GB G.Skill DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT240 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 500GB Seagate 7200.10 + 2x1.5TB Seagate LP in RAID0
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX465 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 02:40 PM   #20
mamisano
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 39 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts

System Specs

What exactly does this mean when you list the drivers used?

ATI: Catalyst 9.1, HD 4890: 8.592.1, HD 4770: 8.60
mamisano is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 03:04 PM   #21
Jizzler
2000 Posts
 
Jizzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 2,467 (1.50/day)
Thanks: 355
Thanked 455 Times in 379 Posts

System Specs

Expreview has two 4770's topping a 4890, so it's not like anyone would be hurting with only two cards, it just seems like the perfect card for a triple Crossfire.

- It's performance would be high. You're going to 4890+ performance all/most of the time.

- The cost would be within reach of a lot of people who would buy a 4890 (especially when they start selling for $99).

- And it extends your e-peen! Which is why the above two reasons make sense to me
Jizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 03:06 PM   #22
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.36/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
AMD said: "By design, the 4770 is limited to two cards in CrossFireX".

why dont you go out and buy 4 of these cards and find out? amd will sure be happy about your $$$
I'll buy two if you buy the other two and send them to me. I have a feeling it'll work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
Why have two crossfire fingers on the card then? Wouldn't only one be needed for crossfire between two cards?

Did the HD4670 support more than two cards?

I mean it is all kind of pointless, since crossfiring with mid-range cards doesn't really pan out cost wise, but I'm still curious.
Yes, and apparently it scaled really well, too: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...25#post3428325

I don't see why they wouldn't want to do it with the 4770 unless they're scared it'll cut into the profits of the 4890 or something.
__________________
Win•dows: n. A thirty-two bit extension and graphical shell to a sixteen-bit patch to an eight-bit operating system originally coded for a four-bit microprocessor which was written by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition.

mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 03:21 PM   #23
mudkip
1000 Posts
 
mudkip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: HOLLAND!
Posts: 1,087 (0.94/day)
Thanks: 165
Thanked 133 Times in 119 Posts

System Specs

Seriosuly what a shit review?

''Negative points''

* High idle power consumption

* No architectural improvements
* Could be quieter
* Cooler on our sample does not represent the shipping product
* No support for CUDA / PhysX

No support for CUDA? / PhysX , oh come on! what you'd expect? It's ATi not nVidia and PhysX is nVidia only , also the list with physx support is so small it's even not important anymore . It's like when reviewing a nVidia card you say: It doesn't support AVIVO. Geez...


* Dual slot cooler

When the HD4850 was released everybody was complaining about how hot the card was and that it would be bad for the card to get that warm. Now AMD listened to their customers and they placed a bigger cooler and now you're complaining about the size?

Again a shit negative point
__________________
i7 920 4,7Ghz on air![/CENTER][/B]
mudkip is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mudkip For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 28, 2009, 03:34 PM   #24
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
 
DrPepper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,414 (4.30/day)
Thanks: 972
Thanked 824 Times in 665 Posts
Send a message via MSN to DrPepper Send a message via Skype™ to DrPepper

System Specs

O_o 800 MHz GDDR5? Does anybody even make such slow chips?".

I though it was a bit slow for gddr5 then I saw the OC results ... holy crap.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mudkip View Post
''Negative points''

No support for CUDA? / PhysX , oh come on! what you'd expect? It's ATi not nVidia and PhysX is nVidia only , also the list with physx support is so small it's even not important anymore . It's like when reviewing a nVidia card you say: It doesn't support AVIVO. Geez...
AMD and ATI are freely allowed to use CUDA but they refuse to. Hence its a negative point.
DrPepper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2009, 03:50 PM   #25
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 15,651 (6.88/day)
Thanks: 676
Thanked 4,020 Times in 2,974 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mudkip View Post
* Dual slot cooler

When the HD4850 was released everybody was complaining about how hot the card was and that it would be bad for the card to get that warm. Now AMD listened to their customers and they placed a bigger cooler and now you're complaining about the size?

Again a shit negative point
There are still people out there that frown on dual-slot coolers.

The HD4850 needed a dual slot cooler, the single slot cooler was simply not enough to keep the core, memory, and vregs cool. This card does not need a dual-slot cooler, the core runs much cooler, the memory doesn't even need cooling, and the vregs don't need cooling either.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: Celeron E3200@4.0GHz / eVGA 780i A1 / 8GB G.Skill DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT240 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 500GB Seagate 7200.10 + 2x1.5TB Seagate LP in RAID0
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX465 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD Overclockers Club AthlonX2 techPowerUp! Club Forum 2777 Dec 30, 2010 09:21 PM
"AMD Processor model unknown" tylerward General Hardware 8 Apr 17, 2009 08:01 PM
GET up to 34% performance increase in DX10 games saikamaldoss AMD / ATI 149 Mar 22, 2009 10:15 PM
AMD Gives ATI Radeon HD 4600 Series Graphics Cards to the Masses malware News 3 Sep 11, 2008 12:54 AM
I've moved to the Darkside does anyone have this motherboard trt740 Overclocking & Cooling 27 May 23, 2007 06:10 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts