![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
|
Powercolor X1300 Hypermemory 2
To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Powercolor/X1300/
Last edited by D_o_S; Mar 13, 2006 at 06:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cali
Posts: 399 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
nice card for the price, i probly wouldnt get it even if i needed a card and i was low on money...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,066 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 827
Thanked 913 Times in 746 Posts
|
I dunno - the benchmark numbers are rather pathetic for the price, bordering on unuseable... between the GTO and GTO2 cards, there just isn't any comparison. And my old 9800 card (albeit AGP) beats this hands down. I'm curious why the thumbs up, just being nice, or comparing with current trends?
Ok, backpedal a little... it appears "useable" at 1024x768 with no AA or AAF, but thats it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
I have to agree that this card is not very usable at 1600x1200, but it is an OK card for a occasional gamer, who will most probably be fine with playing at 1024x768. Also, it doesn't seem to have any "unnecessary" features: the bundle is simple (no games for example, but does have everything necessary to get the card running), and also, compared to other X1300 cards, the PCB is low profile, for example. Basically, if you need a card to get your PC going (i.e. you've built a system, but are waiting for the next generation of graphics cards), I would reccomend this card - it is not all that expensive, has shader model 3.0, and will run most games OK at a low resolution. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|