1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

1090T x6 -> i5 2400 (quad) upgrade log :D

Discussion in 'Project Logs' started by Mussels, Dec 22, 2013.

  1. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,731 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,949
    scored an i5 and mobo cheap, and its faster than what i currently have as far as gaming goes, so i'm doing my usual thang and throwing up some benchmarks.

    my 7970 is OC'd via sapphire TRIXX to: 1000/1750 at 1.068v. while it can do upto 1.2GHz, it gets loud and its plenty fast at 1GHz.

    1090T was at 3.6GHz with turbo disabled, and 4x2GB of DDR3, running at 1333Mhz 9-9-9-24. rams rated at 1600 7-7-7-20 @ 1.65v but it clocked very poorly on this setup.


    Benchmarks and power consumption:

    1090T "real men use real cores" system

    Windows Idle: 140W

    Wprime:
    32M: 8.38s (50.28 per core)
    1024M: 248s (1488s per core) - 251W

    3Dmark 11:
    P8226: 388W in test 1, all other tests lower (cpu limited?)
    X3231: 374W (CPU limited for sure)

    (on hold as i swap mobos and reinstall OS)



    i5 system @ 3.6GHz with ram at XMP timings (1600 7-7-7-20):

    Windows Idle: 89W (51W less)

    Wprime:
    32M 10.734s (42.93s per core)
    1024M (208W 20% less power) 338s (1352 per core - 10% faster)

    3dmark11
    x3275 @ 292W (GPU at stock gotta install trixx and retest)
     
    Last edited: Dec 22, 2013
    marsey99 and PHaS3 say thanks.
  2. SKBARON

    SKBARON

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2013
    Messages:
    195 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Location:
    Chisinau, Moldova
    I wish I could get my hands on an i5 for cheap :D, anything would be better than my Pentium G. Looking forward to see what you come up with benchmark wise :)
     
  3. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    11,040 (3.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,533
    I got my Xeon for €110, new. Woooooop.

    In any case, ncie!
     
  4. GreiverBlade

    GreiverBlade

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,665 (2.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,007
    Location:
    Ovronnaz, Wallis, Switzerland
    i got a i5-2400 + a Z77 Extreme 4 for 140$ then i remplaced it by a Xeon E3-1275v2 found at 200$~ (i sold the i5-2400 for 130$ alone :D )
    it's always happy time when you upgrade, tho my setup came from a Phenom II X6 1035T (non BE) then a Phenom II X4 955 BE @ 4.1ghz

    gratz on the upgrade :clap:

    edit i forgot the delivery for the Xeon :D
     
  5. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,906 (0.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    393
    Location:
    Singapore
    Why not clock the x6 higher?
     
  6. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,731 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,949
    didnt clock well. lots of voltage, lots of heat, lots of noise.


    this system is using 25W less than the x6, and the x6 was at idle while this is installing windows updates...
     
  7. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,731 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,949
    some initial results are in - pure CPU power is up 10%, with power usage down 20% (measured at the wall)


    this is 3.6GHz vs 3.6GHz.
     
  8. puma99dk|

    puma99dk|

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    3,581 (1.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    823
    nice using less powah in idle :D

    but erm one question Mussels how did u get your "Gigabyte 890FXA-UD5" to accept the Intel Core i5-2300 cpu? ^^;
     
    Mussels says thanks.
  9. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,731 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,949
    used a banhammer.
     
    marsey99, BUCK NASTY and puma99dk| say thanks.
  10. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,731 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,949
    great success!


    3.7GHz at load, 3.9GHz turbo
    [​IMG]

    3dmark11 physics test is 30.8% faster, despite two cores less :)
     
    Last edited: Dec 23, 2013
    Vario says thanks.
  11. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,731 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,949
    check the voltage ;) - 127W at full load on CPU, 82W idle

    [​IMG]
     
  12. repman244

    repman244

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,129 (0.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    462
    Noooo.....you may have got more performance but you aren't a man anymore!








    :laugh:
     
  13. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,731 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,949
    i5 has no HT, so its all real cores baby ;)
     
    AlienIsGOD and repman244 say thanks.
  14. VulkanBros

    VulkanBros

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Messages:
    1,423 (0.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    344
    Location:
    The Pico Mundo Grill
    Still a shame :)

    I did it the other way - my i5 3570K (the hole PC) got stolen - bought a FX-9590 instead.....maybe a lot more power-hungry,
    but man - a hole lot faster at decoding movies :)
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  15. Melvis

    Melvis

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,609 (1.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    537
    Location:
    Australia
    So far Im seeing that the i5 is slower but using alot less power? Im half asleep here lol.

    What program do you use for decoding movies with? as I have found this to be also true with my 8350, kicked the pants of my i7 940 at decoding movies.
     
  16. Live OR Die

    Live OR Die

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    4,153 (1.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    451
    Download x264 FHD Benchmark will tell you which is faster or even Asus real bench.
     
  17. Melvis

    Melvis

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,609 (1.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    537
    Location:
    Australia
    Im not a fan of benchmark programs like that, Id rather use real world programs as I have tested alot of different CPU's from Quad core, Six core, 8 Core AMD CPU's, and 12Threaded, and 8 Threaded Intel CPU's. :)
     
  18. AlienIsGOD

    AlienIsGOD

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,565 (1.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,636
    Location:
    Kingston, Ontario Canada
    i must say that i have been very satisfied with my i5 2400 since the day i bought it. I may put the Silverstone Argon on it in place of the Hyper 101i and see if i can get it higher than 3.4ghz on all 4 cores. I know 3.4 isnt much, but i value stability over higher speeds for my 2400 as its my 24/7 WCG rig and the crappy cooler doesnt help things much.
     
    Mussels says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  19. VulkanBros

    VulkanBros

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Messages:
    1,423 (0.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    344
    Location:
    The Pico Mundo Grill
    In danger of being decapitated by Mussels for hijacking his thread :) Sorry Mussels - it wont happen again ;)
    I use various programs - some taking advantage of CUDA some of CPU cores.

    - Handbrake
    - Audials One
    - Freemake Video Converter
    - DVDFab
     
    Melvis says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  20. BUCK NASTY

    BUCK NASTY F@H Mod & 4P Enthusiust Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2007
    Messages:
    4,807 (1.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,326
    Location:
    Tallahassee, FL. U.S.A.
    I lol'd. Have you noticed the system being more responsive?
     
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  21. marsey99

    marsey99

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,799 (0.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    392
  22. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,731 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,949
    funnily enough one of the CPU's i got at the same time had 12 bent pins, works great now they're straight :p
     
  23. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,731 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,949
    so in the end the 3.7GHz/3.9 turbo is the fastest i can get the chip, and it runs great at low voltages. ram sits happy at 1650Mhz.


    overall a great upgrade that benchmarks didnt really show would be as great as it was - so much bad information on the net about overclocking non-k CPU's.
     
  24. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,731 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,949
    i'm doing this on the stock cooler. you can clock to 3.6-3.7 and undervolt.

    handbrake is the bomb.
     
    AlienIsGOD says thanks.
  25. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    5,045 (3.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,329
    Undervolting cpu's is just as much fun as overclocking sometimes. I am undervolting a 2ghz Ive bridge Celeron right now.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page