• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Need some feedback and advice for optimizing our website

Do you think www.wearecapicua.com has a fast load time?

  • No, its not fast, you should consider another hosting

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I Don't know.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    4
  • Poll closed .
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
576 (0.10/day)
System Name Epsilon
Processor A12-9800E 35watts
Motherboard MSI Grenade AM4
Cooling Stock
Memory 2x4GB DDR4 2400 Kingston Hyper X
Video Card(s) Radeon R7 (IGP / APU)
Storage Samsung Spinpoint F1
Display(s) AOC 29" Ultra wide
Case Generic
Power Supply Antec Earthwatts 380w
Software Windows 10
Hello community,
I recently posted in the non-sense forum about the translation to english of our site.
(You can see that here if you are interested)

However, my other concern is also the performance of the site. It seems to me, its a little bit "heavy" and its load time is quite long... maybe... or maybe not, depends on where I'm connected.
So my question is,

Should we use an optimizer? which one would you recommend?
What's the best way of improving the load time of a website?

check it here: www.wearecapicua.com

I get 10 sec aprox to load the main elements.

Thank you in advance
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
18,930 (2.86/day)
Location
Piteå
System Name Black MC in Tokyo
Processor Ryzen 5 5600
Motherboard Asrock B450M-HDV
Cooling Be Quiet! Pure Rock 2
Memory 2 x 16GB Kingston Fury 3400mhz
Video Card(s) XFX 6950XT Speedster MERC 319
Storage Kingston A400 240GB | WD Black SN750 2TB |WD Blue 1TB x 2 | Toshiba P300 2TB | Seagate Expansion 8TB
Display(s) Samsung U32J590U 4K + BenQ GL2450HT 1080p
Case Fractal Design Define R4
Audio Device(s) Line6 UX1 + some headphones, Nektar SE61 keyboard
Power Supply Corsair RM850x v3
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Cherry MX Board 1.0 TKL Brown
VR HMD Acer Mixed Reality Headset
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Rimworld 4K ready!
Nothing like 10 seconds here, but the video up top (or whatever it is) was choppy for a bit.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.94/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
One page load, over 10Mb of transferred data. I would make that more bandwidth friendly. It loaded "quickly" for me but I also have over 100Mbps downstream and it took over 10 seconds to fully load. I suspect someone with a lesser internet connection would be waiting a little while longer.

My advice: Ditch the animated GIFs and use HTML5 to play compressed video or cut back on the media aspects.

You also should cache the static content as it appears my client takes more time blocking (waiting on Apache) than actually receiving files with the exception of the really big ones but turn-around is still around 250ms before we get data coming back (after the connection is established).

All in all, performance makes sense for how you did things. I would re-think some of your decisions though to make it more friendly for all browsers and types of clients.

Edit: you also have 4 broken links and are using some vendor-specific JS functionality according to Chrome.

Edit2: With this all said, I think it's a slick looking website. I think you just need to make it more efficient. If you're mostly serving up static content, try using Nginx instead of Apache.
 
Last edited:

silentbogo

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
5,474 (1.44/day)
Location
Kyiv, Ukraine
System Name WS#1337
Processor Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard ASUS X570-PLUS TUF Gaming
Cooling Xigmatek Scylla 240mm AIO
Memory 4x8GB Samsung DDR4 ECC UDIMM
Video Card(s) Inno3D RTX 3070 Ti iChill
Storage ADATA Legend 2TB + ADATA SX8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s) Samsung U24E590D (4K/UHD)
Case ghetto CM Cosmos RC-1000
Audio Device(s) ALC1220
Power Supply SeaSonic SSR-550FX (80+ GOLD)
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Modecom Volcano Blade (Kailh choc LP)
VR HMD Google dreamview headset(aka fancy cardboard)
Software Windows 11, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
~9.5-13 secs for me.
You can get an insight on what's holding up the loading time by running a profiler in browser ("Audit" in Chrome).
Other than that:
1) reduce the number of external resources(webfonts, javascript etc)
2) Consolidate some local CSS (too many unused classes)
3) Load the video dynamically after the entire page has been loaded


Quick summary: Design looks awesome.
18 HTML validation errors, 88 CSS errors, 4 javascript errors
 

AsRock

TPU addict
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
18,874 (3.07/day)
Location
UK\USA
Processor AMD 3900X \ AMD 7700X
Motherboard ASRock AM4 X570 Pro 4 \ ASUS X670Xe TUF
Cooling D15
Memory Patriot 2x16GB PVS432G320C6K \ G.Skill Flare X5 F5-6000J3238F 2x16GB
Video Card(s) eVga GTX1060 SSC \ XFX RX 6950XT RX-695XATBD9
Storage Sammy 860, MX500, Sabrent Rocket 4 Sammy Evo 980 \ 1xSabrent Rocket 4+, Sammy 2x990 Pro
Display(s) Samsung 1080P \ LG 43UN700
Case Fractal Design Pop Air 2x140mm fans from Torrent \ Fractal Design Torrent 2 SilverStone FHP141x2
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V677 \ Yamaha CX-830+Yamaha MX-630 Infinity RS4000\Paradigm P Studio 20, Blue Yeti
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TX-750 \ Corsair RM1000X Shift
Mouse Steelseries Sensei wireless \ Steelseries Sensei wireless
Keyboard Logitech K120 \ Wooting Two HE
Benchmark Scores Meh benchmarks.
Did not notice the poll until just and loaded near enough instantly for me.
 
Top