1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

28 nm struggles: TSMC & GlobalFoundries

Discussion in 'News' started by qubit, Jan 22, 2012.

  1. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,821 (3.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,480
    Making silicon chips is not easy, requiring hugely expensive fabs, with massive clean-room environments and at every process shrink, the complexity and difficulty of making the things goes up significantly. It looks like TSMC and GlobalFoundries are both having serious yield problems with their 28 nm process nodes, according to Mike Bryant, technology analyst at Future Horizons and this is causing a rash of non-working wafers – to the point of having nothing working with some chip designs submitted for production. It seems that the root cause of these problems are to do with the pressures of bringing products to market, rather than an inherent problem with the technology; it just takes time that they haven't got to iron out the kinks and they're getting stuck: "Foundries have come under pressure to release cell libraries too early – which end up with designs that don't work," Bryant said. In an effort to try and be seen to treat every customer equally, TSMC is attempting to launch ten 28 nm designs from seven companies, but it's not working out too well: "At 45-nm, only NVIDIA was affected. At 28-nm any problems for TSMC will be problems for many customers" said Bryant.

    [​IMG]

    GlobalFoundries are also struggling, although perhaps not quite as badly, according to Bryant: "However, there are recent comments of major yield problems with their 28-nm process actually being even worse than at GF [Globalfoundries]". Their 32 nm & 28 nm nodes are struggling, because they are using problematic gate first processing and this is worsened by the fact that they are using processes from two companies, AMD and IBM. Trying to debug two processes at once is causing serious headaches, compounded by a lack of cooperation between bases in Dresden and the US which appears to be caused by bad management.

    Note that Bryant's assertions are at odds with what TSMC's CEO and chairman Morris Chang said when he spoke to analysts the previous day about the company's fourth quarter financial result: "Our 28-nm entered volume production last year and contributed 2 percent of 4Q11's wafer revenue. Defect density and new progress is ahead of schedule and is better than 40-45-nm at the corresponding stage of the ramp-up. We expect 28-nm ramp this year to be fast and we expect 28-nm will contribute more than 10 percent of total wafer revenue this year." It will soon become apparent who is right.

    Regardkess, the pressure isn't going to let up for these companies, since Intel have been successfully manufacturing at the 32 nm level for a year, making their Sandy Bridge processors. On top of that, in April, Intel will introduce their significantly smaller 22 nm-based process technology in the form of their Ivy Bridge CPUs which have been demonstrated to work very well indeed. These are based on Intel's proprietary Tri-Gate 3D transistor technology too, which gives further performance increases, hence upping competitive pressures significantly.

    Sources: TG Daily, EE Times
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2012
    WarEagleAU, NAVI_Z, 1c3d0g and 4 others say thanks.
  2. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,263 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,484
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    The real reason for 7970 scarcity, 7950 delay and Kepler's Q2 release???
  3. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,824 (1.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    667
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    dang I wanted to get a 7950 hope this doesn't mean more delays or a higher price.
  4. seronx

    seronx

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    Messages:
    993 (0.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    219
    Location:
    USA, Arizona, Maricopa
    But no wait if you read source #2 it says the opposite even though GlobalFoundries isn't in volume production the yields are still better

    The only issue for GF is that volume production starts after Q2 2012(This has been known for sometime and some how the article makes it more grim than it sounds)
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2012
    WarEagleAU and qubit say thanks.
  5. Legacy-ZA

    Legacy-ZA New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Messages:
    20 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Just another reason to raise prices. Pathetic.
  6. SteelSix

    SteelSix

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    230 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    50
    Location:
    Atlanta, USA
    Or to wait for things to shake out. Me, I'm done chasing product launches. It's not been easy, but I'm holding out..
  7. Aleksander

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    3,254 (1.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    304
    Nvidia will again be affected
    Anything to do with SWPA?
  8. Hokum

    Hokum New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2011
    Messages:
    65 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Location:
    Glossop, UK
    Isn't global foundries a spin off of AMD?
  9. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,981 (2.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    800
    Location:
    Italy
    I was somehow expecting something like this, isn't TMSC ALSO manufacturing SoC for smartphones/tablets? I am sure about Apple SoCs.
    The advantage Intel has with the manufacturing process will probably give them an edge when entering on SoC market with Medfield while all the rest struggles with TMSC 28nm problems.

    There isn't the need to jump on 28nm graphics right now, assuming you are talking about graphics of course :), consoles are holding the development and until they get a refresh the "older" 5xx/6xxx series are more than enough for playing.
  10. Dj-ElectriC

    Dj-ElectriC

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,170 (1.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    826
    And they told us there absolutely no problems with 28nm manufacturing processes, way to go...
    1c3d0g says thanks.
  11. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,617 (13.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,013
    So.. according to TMSC:

    As far as Glo-Fo goes, there is nothing but "rumor" according to TechEye that they are having problems.

    Looks like it is definitely a bunch of FUD.
    WarEagleAU and qubit say thanks.
  12. GC_PaNzerFIN

    GC_PaNzerFIN

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    505 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    469
    Location:
    Finland
    I recently downgraded to GTX 460 from GTX 580 because I plan to upgrade to some even faster 28nm card. Although I wouldn't really NEED one right now (I can play everything I have now just fine, at decreased quality settings tho) I can't wait to get my hands on one. HD 7970 looks pretty tempting, especially the DC2 card, but I would really prefer NVIDIA. GK104 is definately coming first but that really isn't what I am looking for either, I am waiting for the GK100. Too bad it looks like I have to wait till H2 this year... :(
  13. seronx

    seronx

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    Messages:
    993 (0.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    219
    Location:
    USA, Arizona, Maricopa
    Of the foundries AMD owned + More

    Fab 1 - Dresden, Germany
    Fab 8 - Luther Forest Technology Campus, Saratoga County, New York, USA

    Are the only two that AMD use to have ownership on

    http://www.globalfoundries.com/manufacturing/300mm.aspx
    http://www.globalfoundries.com/manufacturing/200mm.aspx

    Everything else was Chartered Semiconductor

    http://www.globalfoundries.com/manufacturing/fab8_overview.aspx

    Take note of this:

    If I had anything to speculate I would be saying GlobalFoundries is perfecting the process before going into volume rather than releasing the process in an unoptimized way

    My guesses:
    28nm-SHP => 28nm FD-SOI UTBOX HKMG eSiGe (Kaveri APU/Steamroller CPU)
    28nm-HPP => 28nm Bulk HKMG eSiGe
    28nm-HP => 28nm Bulk HKMG eSiGe
    28nm-SLP => 28nm Bulk HKMG eSiGe
    28nm-LPH => 28nm FD-SOI UTBOX HKMG eSiGe (Wichita/Krishna APUs(The current Bobcat is getting an extension on 40nm while these APUs are releasing next year))

    Bold = Q2 2012 and later
    Red Bold= Q4 2012 and later
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2012
    Lipton says thanks.
  14. badtaylorx

    badtaylorx

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Messages:
    474 (0.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    152
    so much for the early summer price war :cry:
  15. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,821 (3.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,480
    Yes, quite, thankyou. I'd meant to fix that bit before I published the article, so I'm not sure what happened. Fixed now. :toast:

    Yup, I'd meant to add that bit in too (TSMC's CEO statement). Fixed. :)
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2012
  16. a_ump

    a_ump

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,598 (1.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    367
    Location:
    Smithfield, WV
    i really am never surprised about this when new process nodes are released. Every single one for the last 3 nodes or so seem to run into hiccups, i just accept it as that's how it'll always work. nothing new imo
  17. OneCool

    OneCool

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Messages:
    844 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    66
    Location:
    Look behind you!!
    Seems that the 28nm process is a mother... how long has this been giving them issues now 6-8 months?

    You know Intel is sitting back laughing :rolleyes:
  18. seronx

    seronx

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    Messages:
    993 (0.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    219
    Location:
    USA, Arizona, Maricopa
    Most of the issues for GloFo is Gate First while TSMC doesn't have the same excuse
    Once 28nm becomes full volume production it will mostly roll out
    GF 28nm > TSMC 28nm

    I would actually wait and see Intel has been getting some backlash about lying about tidbits of their 22nm Tri-gate process
  19. ice_v

    ice_v

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2010
    Messages:
    110 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12
    Location:
    Italy
    lol true

    of all the chip players, Intel is one of the few that can actually relax for at least the entire Q1.
  20. Protagonist

    Protagonist

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    718 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    123
    Damn, but I'm not in a harry to get new graphic card, too bud for TSMC they've been having this issue for a while now.

    While Intel seem to be yanking out new process with less strain than TSMC or any other fab.

    And there was an article here stating that Intel has 14nm chips already being tested in their labs as of last year, and its not due till 2014 i think, that's how Intel does it, If they are to release new nanometer they start preparing years in advance.
  21. dude12564 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    472 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    216
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    That should be correct, i think it's Broadwell (Shrink of Haswell) and Airmont (Successor of Silvermont, which is then the successor of Medfield) coming out, if Intel keeps their Tick-Tock going.
    1c3d0g says thanks.
  22. Protagonist

    Protagonist

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    718 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    123
    You seem to know the details. I've had this info before, do you by any chance know where i can find Intel's read map, i used to find them on their website but nowadays i cant seem to see them, so if you can find the road map please post it or post a link preferably PDF
  23. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,133 (1.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    458
    It said that they were testing early forms of it. It's not like they have tons of those sitting around. Intel goes out of their way to find the best engineers they can. GF has been doing a lot of talent hunting in the past year or so for a plant they are openning in NY as well, but Intel is definitely top dog.
  24. seronx

    seronx

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    Messages:
    993 (0.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    219
    Location:
    USA, Arizona, Maricopa
    Capacity: 1st. Intel 2nd. GlobalFoundries & Samsung
    Development: 1st. Intel 2nd. Anyone part of the SOI Consortium(IBM, GlobalFoundries, STMicroelectrics, etc.
    Production of the Highest End: 1. GlobalFoundries 2. Intel

    GlobalFoundries 32nm-SHP should be the most expensive process yet it is cheaper than Intel's 32nm high-end process

    There is no way 315.8mm² of 32nm-SHP actually costs $245- and 32nm from Intel at 200-295mm² costs $285+
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2012
  25. largon New Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,778 (0.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    432
    Location:
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    And I thought AMD actually had to buy fabbing from a subsidiary. (Sorry for the sarcasm.)
    I guess by "development" you only meant the lenght of the development cycle, not technological advancement, shrinkage of fab processes, etc.
    Yet, AMD's chips are slower and consume considerably more power.
    [​IMG]

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page