• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Sapphire Radeon RX 7700 XT Pure

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,142 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Sapphire's Radeon RX 7700 XT Pure comes with a great-looking white cooler design that makes it a top choice for every white build. Compared to the Pulse you get a more powerful cooler that has three fans instead of two, with whisper-quiet noise levels and good temperatures.

Show full review
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
7,170 (1.45/day)
Location
Rīga, Latvia
System Name HELLSTAR
Processor AMD RYZEN 9 5950X
Motherboard ASUS Strix X570-E
Cooling 2x 360 + 280 rads. 3x Gentle Typhoons, 3x Phanteks T30, 2x TT T140 . EK-Quantum Momentum Monoblock.
Memory 4x8GB G.SKILL Trident Z RGB F4-4133C19D-16GTZR 14-16-12-30-44
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse RX 7900XTX + under waterblock through Kryosheet
Storage Optane 900P[W11] + WD BLACK SN850X 4TB + 750 EVO 500GB + 1TB 980PRO[FEDORA]
Display(s) Philips PHL BDM3270 + Acer XV242Y
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow V3 - Yellow Switch
Software FEDORA 40
It's your finger on the die shot or it came like that from the factory? :D
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
2,121 (0.43/day)
That OC graph is remarkable. It shows that the core clock is'nt in effect in higher performance when oc'ing, it's purely memory bandwidth. This pulse OC'ed at avg 3.05Ghz scores less then a reference AMD card at avg 2.7Ghz.

It's such a weird launch - i'd say the 6700XT still holds this crown value in regards of performance, features and in particular the use of MorePowerTools thats not functional on these 7x00 series.
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
4,110 (2.59/day)
Location
Ex-usa | slava the trolls
The memory clock for video playback is ridiculous. Let's hope they will fix it, because it's unbearable. :banghead:

1694804633173.png


1694804662563.png


36 watts is not ok.

When the RX 6700 XT does it in only 16 watts.

1694804710992.png


And RX 6600 XT does it in only 10 watts.

1694804748656.png
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
7,487 (3.88/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
This card shouldn't exist; it's the castrated version of the 7800XT that loses too much performance to justify the price, or the capability of the cooler strapped to it.

When the 7700XT falls to $399, this model will still be a hard sell because it's still going to have that $20 premium and the only reason you'd be looking at a 7700XT is because the budget is already tight, likely ruling out premium versions of any SKU.

The review is helpful though, as it's the first proper teardown I've seen of the Sapphire PURE cooler and that's just about guaranteed to be identical for the 7800XT PURE.
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2021
Messages
1,372 (1.49/day)
Location
Mississauga, Canada
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PRO (WiFi 6)
Cooling Noctua NH-C14S (two fans)
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) Reference Vega 64
Storage Intel 665p 1TB, WD Black SN850X 2TB, Crucial MX300 1TB SATA, Samsung 830 256 GB SATA
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG27, and Samsung S23A700
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME TITANIUM 850W
Mouse Logitech
VR HMD Oculus Rift
Software Windows 11 Pro, and Ubuntu 20.04
That OC graph is remarkable. It shows that the core clock is'nt in effect in higher performance when oc'ing, it's purely memory bandwidth. This pulse OC'ed at avg 3.05Ghz scores less then a reference AMD card at avg 2.7Ghz.

It's such a weird launch - i'd say the 6700XT still holds this crown value in regards of performance, features and in particular the use of MorePowerTools thats not functional on these 7x00 series.
There's no reference card in the overclocking table. It still gets about 15% additional performance after overclocking so it's making good use of the additional clock.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
2,657 (0.56/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600@80W
Motherboard MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling ZALMAN CNPS9X OPTIMA
Memory 2*8GB PATRIOT PVS416G400C9K@3733MT_C16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Pulse 12GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 128GB, Kingston A2000 NVMe 1TB, Samsung F1 1TB, WD Black 10TB
Display(s) AOC 27G2U/BK IPS 144Hz
Case SHARKOON M25-W 7.1 BLACK
Audio Device(s) Realtek 7.1 onboard
Power Supply Seasonic Core GC 500W
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 Ultimate 64bit/Win 10 pro 64bit/Manjaro Linux
This card shouldn't exist; it's the castrated version of the 7800XT that loses too much performance to justify the price, or the capability of the cooler strapped to it.

When the 7700XT falls to $399, this model will still be a hard sell because it's still going to have that $20 premium and the only reason you'd be looking at a 7700XT is because the budget is already tight, likely ruling out premium versions of any SKU.

The review is helpful though, as it's the first proper teardown I've seen of the Sapphire PURE cooler and that's just about guaranteed to be identical for the 7800XT PURE.
You probably underestimate the budget restricted pc owners/builders/users. Once this GPU drops to $400 or below, it will sell faster than produced. And after a few days, not even weeks, nVidia will start to heavily discount 4060Tis. Just a simple prediction based on market's product positioning of today.
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2021
Messages
1,372 (1.49/day)
Location
Mississauga, Canada
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PRO (WiFi 6)
Cooling Noctua NH-C14S (two fans)
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) Reference Vega 64
Storage Intel 665p 1TB, WD Black SN850X 2TB, Crucial MX300 1TB SATA, Samsung 830 256 GB SATA
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG27, and Samsung S23A700
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME TITANIUM 850W
Mouse Logitech
VR HMD Oculus Rift
Software Windows 11 Pro, and Ubuntu 20.04
Thanks for the review @W1zzard . I hope you had a great vacation. Adding the average clock for the benchmark used to measure overclocking to the "Energy Efficiency" section would help to see how much the clock increased by in that particular case.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
3,546 (0.85/day)
System Name Skunkworks
Processor 5800x3d
Motherboard x570 unify
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory 32GB 3600 mhz
Video Card(s) asrock 6800xt challenger D
Storage Sabarent rocket 4.0 2TB, MX 500 2TB
Display(s) Asus 1440p144 27"
Case Old arse cooler master 932
Power Supply Corsair 1200w platinum
Mouse *squeak*
Keyboard Some old office thing
Software openSUSE tumbleweed/Mint 21.2
This card shouldn't exist; it's the castrated version of the 7800XT that loses too much performance to justify the price, or the capability of the cooler strapped to it.

When the 7700XT falls to $399, this model will still be a hard sell because it's still going to have that $20 premium and the only reason you'd be looking at a 7700XT is because the budget is already tight, likely ruling out premium versions of any SKU.

The review is helpful though, as it's the first proper teardown I've seen of the Sapphire PURE cooler and that's just about guaranteed to be identical for the 7800XT PURE.
I think that's a little harsh. The 7700xt is the speed of a 6800, which was $580 at launch. It's about 15-20% faster then the 6700xt, a $480 part. It really only looks bad due to the 7800xt's price being good, the same problem the 7900 xt had.

At $399 its a decent improvement over the previous generation in perf/$. Compared to the garbage 8GB nvidia options it's the only viable mid ranger out there.
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2022
Messages
261 (0.43/day)
Processor Ryzen 5 7600X
Motherboard Asus Proart B650
Cooling Noctua U12S
Memory Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 5600MHz C36 AMD Expo
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7800 XT Nitro+
Storage Samsung 990 Pro 1Tb
Case Fractal Design Pop Silent
Audio Device(s) Edifier r1900tII
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Platinum 650W
580€ in Germany... Ridiculous.
For 450€ I would probably order it. For 400€ without delay. But for 500+ I just won't.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2023
Messages
2,306 (4.96/day)
Location
Russian Wild West
System Name DLSS / YOLO-PC
Processor i5-12400F / 10600KF
Motherboard Gigabyte B760M DS3H / Z490 Vision D
Cooling Laminar RM1 / Gammaxx 400
Memory 32 GB DDR4-3200 / 16 GB DDR4-3333
Video Card(s) RX 6700 XT / RX 480 8 GB
Storage A couple SSDs, m.2 NVMe included / 240 GB CX1 + 1 TB WD HDD
Display(s) Compit HA2704 / Viewsonic VX3276-MHD-2
Case Matrexx 55 / Junkyard special
Audio Device(s) Want loud, use headphones. Want quiet, use satellites.
Power Supply Thermaltake 1000 W / FSP Epsilon 700 W / Corsair CX650M [backup]
Mouse Don't disturb, cheese eating in progress...
Keyboard Makes some noise. Probably onto something.
VR HMD I live in real reality and don't need a virtual one.
Software Windows 10 and 11
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
791 (0.63/day)
Processor E5-2690 v4
Motherboard VEINEDA X99
Video Card(s) 2080 Ti
Storage NE-512 KingSpec
Display(s) G27Q
Case DAOTECH X9
Power Supply SF450
Not all that bad. 7700 with OC is a 4070. not to mention in starfield. 499 in Ger actually, 529, 569 for pusle and nitro. But yeah that's insane and MLid said there is enough supply. 7800 Xt at 599 only lasted a day and that leaves 7700 as the only alternative for the same price.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
7,487 (3.88/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
I think that's a little harsh. The 7700xt is the speed of a 6800, which was $580 at launch. It's about 15-20% faster then the 6700xt, a $480 part. It really only looks bad due to the 7800xt's price being good, the same problem the 7900 xt had.

At $399 its a decent improvement over the previous generation in perf/$. Compared to the garbage 8GB nvidia options it's the only viable mid ranger out there.
IMO we shouldn't be using MSRPs to compare anything these days; Their relevance went out of the window back in 2017 with the first ETH mining boom. There have been different EXTERNAL factors to the GPU market that impacted price wildly since 2017, and unlike the relative stability of GPU pricing for the two decades before that, the last 6 years have seen three major events that have caused price swings of insane magnitude. It was normal (I didn't say it was a good idea) to buy and sell RX 5700 cards for over $1000 for the best part of a year in 2020. That had a 2019 MSRP of $349. Same deal for 3080 and 3090 cards - their MSRP was meaninglessly low, and then briefly made sense in comparison to the actual selling prices earlier this year - two years too late for the MSRP to mean anything.

An MSRP is only valid as a snapshot of the market pricing at that point in time. A 6800 at $580 ETH-boom pricing today is a rip-off, nobody would touch it, and it would get left on shelves, making its launch MSRP invalid in the current market.

The current sale price of a brand new 6800 is $430 because that is what people are willing to pay for them. At $470 this 7700XT is just 6% cheaper than several decent 7800XT cards, which are 15-20% faster and have better performance/Watt. 6% isn't enough of a discount to make anyone even blink, If they can afford the $20 premium over the 7700XT base model, they can definitely afford to just get a 7800XT in the first place!
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
4,110 (2.59/day)
Location
Ex-usa | slava the trolls
I think that's a little harsh. The 7700xt is the speed of a 6800, which was $580 at launch. It's about 15-20% faster then the 6700xt, a $480 part. It really only looks bad due to the 7800xt's price being good, the same problem the 7900 xt had.

At $399 its a decent improvement over the previous generation in perf/$. Compared to the garbage 8GB nvidia options it's the only viable mid ranger out there.

What about compared to the 16 GB options? 12 GB vs 16 GB is also not desirable.

The RX 6800 16GB is a better buy because of the VRAM longevity, future proofing and fine wine.

12 GB is also garbage. Especially that there are 24GB, 20GB and 16GB options.

12 GB is 50% of 24 GB, so today having a card with 12 GB is like it was with having a 4 GB card when the 8 GB cards were top notch.
 
Last edited:

Space Lynx

Astronaut
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
16,495 (4.69/day)
Location
Kepler-186f
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D -30 uv
Motherboard AsRock Steel Legend B650
Cooling MSI C360 AIO
Memory T-Create 32gb 6000 CL 30
Video Card(s) MERC310 7900 XT -60 uv +150 core
Display(s) NZXT Canvas IPS 1440p 165hz 27"
Case NZXT H710 (Red/Black)
Audio Device(s) SHP-9500, custom tube amp, Modi 3 dac
Power Supply Corsair RM850W
Not all that bad. 7700 with OC is a 4070. not to mention in starfield. 499 in Ger actually, 529, 569 for pusle and nitro. But yeah that's insane and MLid said there is enough supply. 7800 Xt at 599 only lasted a day and that leaves 7700 as the only alternative for the same price.

yeah Starfield is great. it's what pushed me over the edge in getting my 7900 XT, no regrets, been rock solid and having a blast all summer.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
5,425 (0.97/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k -> 12600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0 -> Gigabyte Z690 Auros Elite DDR4
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120 -> Custom Watercoolingloop
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz -> Crucial (8x2) 16gb 3600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480 -> RX7800XT
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb -> 2tb MVMe SSD
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television) -> Dell S3220DGF
Case antec 600 -> Thermaltake Tenor HTCP case
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
it is a pretty solid product, just priced too high, 400 euro with a game (but rather not starfield....) and it would be a pretty solid purchase.

Though personally I would want to see it even lower, 380 - 360 or so.
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
4,110 (2.59/day)
Location
Ex-usa | slava the trolls
it is a pretty solid product, just priced too high

Wrong marketing number, should be RX 7700 with 16 GB VRAM.
And the 16GB RX 7800 XT whould be RX 7700 XT 16GB.

Then, I agree.
 
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
1,805 (0.42/day)
Location
Netherlands
System Name TheDeeGee's PC
Processor Intel Core i7-11700
Motherboard ASRock Z590 Steel Legend
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory Crucial Ballistix 3200/C16 32GB
Video Card(s) Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti 12GB
Storage Crucial P5 Plus 2TB / Crucial P3 Plus 2TB / Crucial P3 Plus 4TB
Display(s) EIZO CX240
Case Lian-Li O11 Dynamic Evo XL
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster ZxR / AKG K601 Headphones
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME Fanless TX-700
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Keychron Q6
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
Benchmark Scores None, as long as my games runs smooth.
Man, AMD is really stuck in the stoneage when it comes to efficiency.
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
4,110 (2.59/day)
Location
Ex-usa | slava the trolls
Yeah, the efficiency graph shows that the node shrink didn't work.
AMD is a generation behind with RDNA 3.

1694882972268.png
 

Space Lynx

Astronaut
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
16,495 (4.69/day)
Location
Kepler-186f
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D -30 uv
Motherboard AsRock Steel Legend B650
Cooling MSI C360 AIO
Memory T-Create 32gb 6000 CL 30
Video Card(s) MERC310 7900 XT -60 uv +150 core
Display(s) NZXT Canvas IPS 1440p 165hz 27"
Case NZXT H710 (Red/Black)
Audio Device(s) SHP-9500, custom tube amp, Modi 3 dac
Power Supply Corsair RM850W
Man, AMD is really stuck in the stoneage when it comes to efficiency.

its a matter of money. Nvidia could be even more efficient with a refresh of 3nm gpu ti versions next year, but they can't, cause Apple bought all the 3nm node from TSMC for next year. same goes for AMD, Nvidia is richer company and bought all the 4nm node, so they had to stick with 5 and 6nm.

It's all just who is richest and can get best node first from TSMC, that's all this is from what I can observe anyway.
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
4,110 (2.59/day)
Location
Ex-usa | slava the trolls
its a matter of money. Nvidia could be even more efficient with a refresh of 3nm gpu ti versions next year, but they can't, cause Apple bought all the 3nm node from TSMC for next year. same goes for AMD, Nvidia is richer company and bought all the 4nm node, so they had to stick with 5 and 6nm.

It's all just who is richest and can get best node first from TSMC, that's all this is from what I can observe anyway.

The "best node" can be neutralised by good pricing. If they offer 6nm and 5nm chips, then price them accordingly. As everyone already said - AMD's prices are too high for what it's worth.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
3,546 (0.85/day)
System Name Skunkworks
Processor 5800x3d
Motherboard x570 unify
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory 32GB 3600 mhz
Video Card(s) asrock 6800xt challenger D
Storage Sabarent rocket 4.0 2TB, MX 500 2TB
Display(s) Asus 1440p144 27"
Case Old arse cooler master 932
Power Supply Corsair 1200w platinum
Mouse *squeak*
Keyboard Some old office thing
Software openSUSE tumbleweed/Mint 21.2
What about compared to the 16 GB options? 12 GB vs 16 GB is also not desirable.

The RX 6800 16GB is a better buy because of the VRAM longevity, future proofing and fine wine.

12 GB is also garbage. Especially that there are 24GB, 20GB and 16GB options.

12 GB is 50% of 24 GB, so today having a card with 12 GB is like it was with having a 4 GB card when the 8 GB cards were top notch.
That's not how VRAM works.

8GB of VRAM is insufficient for modern games. We have seen multiple games in which 8GB cards have severe stuttering issues, failure to load textures, and other major issues that do not affect 16, 12, or even 10GB cards.

Consoles play a major factor in this. The xbox series X is the baseline, with 10GB of high speed RAM. This will largely be used for graphics, where the smaller 6GB "slow" ram will be used more for system processes, audio, ECE. This is why the 10GB 3080s are still working pretty well. Until the series X is replaced, the 12GB cards of today will be sufficient. The same way 512MB cards were fine with games at 720p, and 1GB cards were plentiful for 1080p, until the PS4/xbone came out. The only time 10GB cards have shown to be insufficient was at 4k, which is a higher rez then consoles run at.

Buying 16GB over 12GB, for 1080p/1440p is rather pointless today, as 12GB cards are not running out of VRAM and wont for this console generation. And before you go "but muh series S" yes, that only has 8GB, and games on that console typically run like total trash compared to series X, with sub 1080p resolution with dithering, poor framerates, and muddy textures.

So yeah. 12GB is fine. And the 7700xt is a 6700xt replacement, which was a 12GB card.
IMO we shouldn't be using MSRPs to compare anything these days; Their relevance went out of the window back in 2017 with the first ETH mining boom. There have been different EXTERNAL factors to the GPU market that impacted price wildly since 2017, and unlike the relative stability of GPU pricing for the two decades before that, the last 6 years have seen three major events that have caused price swings of insane magnitude. It was normal (I didn't say it was a good idea) to buy and sell RX 5700 cards for over $1000 for the best part of a year in 2020. That had a 2019 MSRP of $349. Same deal for 3080 and 3090 cards - their MSRP was meaninglessly low, and then briefly made sense in comparison to the actual selling prices earlier this year - two years too late for the MSRP to mean anything.

An MSRP is only valid as a snapshot of the market pricing at that point in time. A 6800 at $580 ETH-boom pricing today is a rip-off, nobody would touch it, and it would get left on shelves, making its launch MSRP invalid in the current market.

The current sale price of a brand new 6800 is $430 because that is what people are willing to pay for them. At $470 this 7700XT is just 6% cheaper than several decent 7800XT cards, which are 15-20% faster and have better performance/Watt. 6% isn't enough of a discount to make anyone even blink, If they can afford the $20 premium over the 7700XT base model, they can definitely afford to just get a 7800XT in the first place!
That's a load of semantics that is totally pointless. The 6800 could jump up in price tomorrow and make the whole conversation moot. Which is why MSRPs are used for comparison.
 
Last edited:

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
4,110 (2.59/day)
Location
Ex-usa | slava the trolls
12GB cards of today will be sufficient

12GB cards are not running out of VRAM and wont for this console generation

Wishful thinking without connection with the reality. You will not tell anyone how to use their cards and at what settings, ok?!

There are already games which require more than 12 GB of VRAM.

1694890480926.png


1694890523125.png

 
Joined
Feb 24, 2023
Messages
2,306 (4.96/day)
Location
Russian Wild West
System Name DLSS / YOLO-PC
Processor i5-12400F / 10600KF
Motherboard Gigabyte B760M DS3H / Z490 Vision D
Cooling Laminar RM1 / Gammaxx 400
Memory 32 GB DDR4-3200 / 16 GB DDR4-3333
Video Card(s) RX 6700 XT / RX 480 8 GB
Storage A couple SSDs, m.2 NVMe included / 240 GB CX1 + 1 TB WD HDD
Display(s) Compit HA2704 / Viewsonic VX3276-MHD-2
Case Matrexx 55 / Junkyard special
Audio Device(s) Want loud, use headphones. Want quiet, use satellites.
Power Supply Thermaltake 1000 W / FSP Epsilon 700 W / Corsair CX650M [backup]
Mouse Don't disturb, cheese eating in progress...
Keyboard Makes some noise. Probably onto something.
VR HMD I live in real reality and don't need a virtual one.
Software Windows 10 and 11
Wishful thinking without connection with the reality. You will not tell anyone how to use their cards and at what settings, ok?!

There are already games which require more than 12 GB of VRAM.

View attachment 314005

View attachment 314006
There is the nuance: AMD cards don't handle RT Overdrive, and without it, CP2077 consumes pretty well below 10 gigs. Especially if we talking resolutions and settings these AMD GPUs are capable of pushing beyond 60 FPS. 6700 XT, a 12 GB GPU, runs out of steam at ~7.2 GB VRAM usage (1440p Ultra).

Hogwarts Legacy is close to being unplayable on 7800 XT when the settings are tuned to consume more than 10 GB.

TLOUP1 is the only game which can be considered a VRAM hog and this is kinda misleading.

The 7700 XT's problem ain't 12 GB. It's narrow VRAM bus accompanied with relatively slow GDDR6 which cause 7700 XT to be much more than 9% (not 10% because clocks of 7700 XT are higher) slower than 7800 XT. You need more than 432 Gbps at 1440p. Much more.

the 7700xt is a 6700xt replacement
No, it's not. Based on price, it's a 6650 XT's replacement.
RX 7800 XT is a 6700 XT's replacement, according to $480 VS $500 price tags on them. Considering inflation, the newer one is even cheaper.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
7,487 (3.88/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
The "best node" can be neutralised by good pricing. If they offer 6nm and 5nm chips, then price them accordingly. As everyone already said - AMD's prices are too high for what it's worth.
What point are you trying to make, ARF?

They already are neutralised by good pricing! The $500 7800XT is comfortably ahead of the $600 4070, nipping at the heels of the $800 4070Ti, and that includes testing suites with several raytraced games, too.
The $450 7700XT is vastly superior to anything Nvidia offers at under $600, period.

The feature set arguments for Nvidia are also much weaker with the 7000-series; You get an AV1 encoder, improved HEVC and AVC encoder, HYPR-RX to compete with Reflex and Anti-Lag, FSR3 coming soon to let the 7000-series compete with DLSS3 Frame-gen. I have no doubt that the Nvidia versions of all these will be better, more mature offerings, but it's not like you're completely missing out on these things any more, and if the AMD equivalent is good enough, you really do have to ask yourself why the 4070Ti is selling for $300 more than the 7800XT, whilst still only giving you 12GB VRAM.

That's a load of semantics that is totally pointless. The 6800 could jump up in price tomorrow and make the whole conversation moot. Which is why MSRPs are used for comparison.
We'll agree to disagree then.

MSRPs were all utter nonsense for the entirety of 2020, 2021, and 2022. If you want to use them, fine - but I'll continue to use the actual price things can be bought and sold for.
 
Top