Discussion in 'General Software' started by AthlonX2, Dec 18, 2010.
heres my score. GPU and CPU overclocked. PhysX on CPU
It's a discussion thread & not a benchmark scores thread
Post your score there... NEW - 3DMark 11 Compilation
so what exactly do higher scores tell? Bragging rights only? My 4870 and e8400 still have no problem running any game out there on max. How are the results quantified in real world experience?
It means their e-pen1s is 3-6X longer than yours Other than that. its bragging rights.
realistically it means that they can tessellate and run CPU physics better than your rig.
I like the idea of this thread. I get lousy scores in my opinion and I think its due to my cpu, but then I see guys with 80x's at 5ghz and a gtx580 get only 3k more then my setup so it doesnt make sense that it would be my cpu. i think scaling for the cards I have sucks.
How does GTA IV run for you or bad company 2? Metro 2033?
Not my genre, so I dont know ;D
yup good catch, there is no PhysX in this bench. I believe Bullet is the physics that runs in this bench.
when nvidia out sli driver in 3dmark11
Yeah.. that take long. Other use modified quadro driver for sli fix
Is anyone aware of why they run most of the phsics on the cpu for this ? ( as far as I'm aware NO cpu gets decent frames during these tests) even though the soft body phsics runs on the gpu? ( the flags)
nvidia 266 beta driver still no sli in 3dm11?
It think thats suppose to cover the traditional 3dmark cpu test. Seeing that they want to stick with their 'gamer's benchmark' moniker, they might have opted not to do a dedicated test for gpu computation, instead did a 'gpu dependent', 'cpu dependent', and 'mix' tests, as what most games nowadays are exhibiting.
hopefully when 11-1 ccc comes im hoping it runs better in crossfire then 10-12 preview does, 10-12 preview blows chunks
Separate names with a comma.