1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

3DMark (2013)

Discussion in 'General Software' started by natr0n, Feb 4, 2013.

  1. d1nky

    d1nky

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    Messages:
    3,687 (6.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,274
    I really need a new cpu/mobo to get scoring bigger points!!
  2. SIGSEGV

    SIGSEGV

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    506 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    107
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2013
  3. natr0n

    natr0n

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,895 (1.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    972
  4. SIGSEGV

    SIGSEGV

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    506 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    107
    i'm so sorry, i'm just copying from previous poster. :eek:
  5. 15th Warlock

    15th Warlock

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,712 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    994
    Location:
    Visalia, CA
    My score for the first two tests is really low, but the 3rd one seems OK... I don't understand, can anyone help?

    15th Warlock|45477|31966|14301|2xGTX Titan 6GB|i7 3930K|1019/1502|4802 MHz

    [​IMG]
  6. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,289 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,510
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    ... Dont know whether to congratulate or scratch head. 2 Titans in sli only score two hundred points above dual 7970's (clocked up past 1200 mind).

    I keep getting reasons not to buy one..... Can you overclock yours more to see what it can do at absolute maximum?
  7. 15th Warlock

    15th Warlock

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,712 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    994
    Location:
    Visalia, CA
    I'm pretty sure something's messed up with my scores, did you notice the first two scores? They are much lower than anything else in the table, the third one looks kinda OK compared to other systems (highest score so far it seems?) but considering the other two low scores I'm not even sure that score is alright... Something's fishy, I'm using release driver 314.09 btw.

    Will try installing other bench programs, I have my son with me today, and just had the chance to run this program once :)

    Anyone has any idea what could be wrong?
  8. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,492 (3.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,043
    Location:
    Mexico
    You can't have infinite points :laugh:


    No, seriously, SLI issue?
    15th Warlock says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  9. 15th Warlock

    15th Warlock

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,712 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    994
    Location:
    Visalia, CA
    Thanks, I thought that too, it's either that or a driver issue, will try other benchies tonight, has anybody else tried 314.09?

    Another thing I noticed is both first benchmarks hit a 305 FPS hard limit for most of their runs... I thought that was kinda strange.

    Weird thing is both Crysis 3 and new dawn run much better than with my 680s, anyways, will try Vantage, and '11 to see how it goes, thanks :)
  10. HammerON

    HammerON The Watchful Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,487 (3.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,593
    Try running w/out SLI enabled to see what one card does.
    If you can use Afterburner to see what GPU usage you get during your runs w/out and w/ SLI it would help us to determine how well the bench is utilizing the GPU(s).
    I haven't used EVGA Precision in a while so I am not sure if it has something similar.
    [​IMG]

    I personally do not care about the first two scores as Fire Strike is the one that really pushes high-end systems. I would also say that Nvidia needs to release some new drivers for those amazing cards:)
    15th Warlock says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  11. 15th Warlock

    15th Warlock

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,712 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    994
    Location:
    Visalia, CA
    Thank you, I'll try and disable SLI, just ran 3DMark11 and got 22872, I believe that's faster and the fastest triple 7970 setup in the table, so I really don't know what's going in with the 2013 version, guess I'll try disabling one of my cards like you guys propose ;)
  12. HammerON

    HammerON The Watchful Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,487 (3.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,593
    Don't forget to use an app to track GPU usage while running the test. You have enough screen room:)
    15th Warlock says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  13. 15th Warlock

    15th Warlock

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,712 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    994
    Location:
    Visalia, CA
    I just checked, both GPUs are hovering at 15~20% for the first two tests, and around 90% for the third one, something's definitely broken in this benchmark, I think it doesn't like Titan :p even with OCing I'm still hitting a hard 305 FPS limit for both the first benches...
  14. n0tiert

    n0tiert

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    925 (0.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    404
    Location:
    Frankfurt/Main - Germany
    [​IMG]

    n0tiert|115611|19339|6297|Radeon HD 7950|AMD FX-8350|1000/1375|4,400 MHz
  15. MetalRacer

    MetalRacer

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2007
    Messages:
    861 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    699
    Location:
    The Lone Star State
    MetalRacer| 0 | 0 |10516|GTX Titan|Intel Core i7-3930K|1048/1722|4500 MHz

    [​IMG]
    HammerON and 15th Warlock say thanks.
  16. 15th Warlock

    15th Warlock

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,712 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    994
    Location:
    Visalia, CA
    Thanks for posting your score :)

    Can I ask you a question? Did you have any issues running the first two tests on your Titan? I'm having some issues with those tests, please let me know about your experience, thank you :)
  17. MetalRacer

    MetalRacer

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2007
    Messages:
    861 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    699
    Location:
    The Lone Star State
    I didn't run the whole test with a single card but SLI seems ok.

    MetalRacer|183060 |36580 |14483|GTX Titan|Intel Core i7-3930K|928/1502|4500 MHz

    http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/324499
    [​IMG]
    15th Warlock says thanks.
  18. 15th Warlock

    15th Warlock

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,712 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    994
    Location:
    Visalia, CA
    15th Warlock|0 |0 |15405|SLI GTX Titan|Intel Core i7-3930K|1137/1543|5000MHz

    http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/326022
    [​IMG]

    Thanks for your post and running the benchmark, appreciate you taking the time to run the full benchmark, at least I know the score that matters is in the same ballpark as yours, not gonna waste time on the previous two benchmarks anymore :p
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2013
  19. Locksmith

    Locksmith

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2009
    Messages:
    178 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    28
    Location:
    Bolton, England.
  20. natr0n

    natr0n

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,895 (1.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    972
    Updated.
    Let me know if data looks correct.
    Locksmith says thanks.
  21. bpgt64

    bpgt64

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,434 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    193
    Location:
    ATL, GA
    http://www.3dmark.com/fs/264176

    bpgt64|n/a|n/a|10378 | Geforce Titan | Intel Core i7-3930k | 1200/1500| 4,400MHz

    3930k i7 at 4.4ghz
    EVGA Geforce Titan at 1200mhz core clock/5000mhz mem
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2013
  22. ChristTheGreat

    ChristTheGreat

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    922 (0.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    364
    Crunching for Team TPU
  23. Durvelle27

    Durvelle27

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,539 (3.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    632
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    Durvelle27 | | | | | |


    Maxed on my Samsung Galaxy S II

    :D

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
    Crunching for Team TPU
  24. BigMack70

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
    Messages:
    498 (0.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    111
    Anyone else find it weird that this bench favors AMD's cards so much that the Titan barely beats the 7970?

    That seems like a bit of a fail on Futuremark's part if the goal is to represent gaming performance...
  25. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,289 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,510
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    Speaking from experience...

    My 2 7970's got a pretty decent score in crossfire but the experience wasn't smooth. The final Firestrike test was awful, despite it getting a high score.

    My single Titan performed the same test with lower fps but was a hell of a lot smoother. I think 3DMark (2013) is optimised for absolute raw speed but it lacks finesse.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page