1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

6 Gbps SATA Drives Could Arrive as Early as Q2 2009

Discussion in 'News' started by alexp999, Jan 7, 2009.

  1. alexp999

    alexp999 Staff

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    8,045 (3.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    862
    Location:
    Dorset, UK
    According to reports by TechConnect Magazine, the third generation of the SATA interface could be introduced as early as the second quarter of this year. The Serial ATA International Organization (SATA-IO), who have developed the technology, are expected to finalize specifications, with the launch of products sporting the new interface at the same time. The first backwards compatible drives to feature the new interface are expected to be solid state drives (SSD), followed by hard disk drives (HDD) shortly after. The main advancement is doubling the bandwidth from 3Gbps to 6Gbps, but until the official announcement of the final specifications are released, we will not know what further changes are in store.

    Source: TechConnect
     
  2. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,065 (6.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,123
    What is the point when drives aren't even hitting 1.5Gb/s, and they definitely aren't even coming close to 3.0Gb/s?
     
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  3. insider Guest

    RAID performance with multiple drives?
     
  4. oli_ramsay

    oli_ramsay

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    3,476 (1.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    569
    Location:
    UK
    The newer intel SSDs hit way over 1.5Gbps (about 250MB/s read speed) and a faster SATA standard would allow them and others to design an even faster drives, I dread to think how much they would cost though. Hopefully by the time motherboards with SATA 6Gbps are released, SSDs will have come down in price.
     
  5. cool_recep

    cool_recep

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2005
    Messages:
    344 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    63
    Location:
    Istanbul/Turkey
    1.5 Gbps is equal to 187.5 MB/s

    3.0 Gbps is equal to 375 MB/s

    SSDs have reached these speeds. BTW there may be improvements with the response time too.
     
  6. Sonido

    Sonido New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2008
    Messages:
    357 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    86
    Location:
    USA
    SSDs are coming extremely close close to the limit of 3.0Gb/s. It's not there yet, but it could be. It's more of a preemptive strike. When PATA was the standard, it was getting beat before the newer revisions were out.

    HDDs, however, are barely struggling on the 1.5Gb/s SATA. Next gen HDDs will be within the current SSD read/write levels. I actually prefer a HDD to a SDD.
     
  7. Exavier

    Exavier New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007
    Messages:
    982 (0.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    81
    Location:
    Bath, UK
    oh joy..my 2x 1TB HDDs just became obselete in theory /cry
     
  8. Woody112

    Woody112 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    Messages:
    562 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    74
    Location:
    Florida
    I seriously doubt their will ever be a next generation HDD. Due to the fact their is really nothing else they can do to make an individual drive any faster than it already is. Density is being pushed to the max as it is, we already have perpendicular magnetic recording. Really what else can they do? SSD's the sky is the limit, newer faster memory is always right around the corner.
     
  9. spearman914

    spearman914 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,339 (1.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    502
    Location:
    Brooklyn, New York 11223
    6GPBS = 750MBps. That's fast!!! But I doubt the drives will really do 750MBps.
     
  10. a_ump

    a_ump

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,617 (1.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    376
    Location:
    Smithfield, WV
    agree, i give SSD's ~5-10years before they're standard and HDD are to SSD's like CD drives are to DVD drives
     
  11. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,065 (6.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,123
    Intel's high end SSD drives have not even come close to reaching these speeds. Burst speeds are only hitting 250MB/s, and sustained read speeds are only 230MB/s. No where near the 375MB/s given by SATA 3.0Gb/s. And it is unlikely we will see SSD drives breaking the 375MB/s mark.

    I doubt it, SSD drives still have horribly short life spans and that won't change any time soon. I'm not going to pay $500+ for a 32GB drive only to have it fail after a year of use.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  12. a_ump

    a_ump

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,617 (1.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    376
    Location:
    Smithfield, WV
    hey the best ones are only $300 :p but i hear you i won't buy an SSD until they're prices around 250gb fro 100-120. True SSD's won't change anytime soon, but 5-10years is a good amount of time especially in the computing world.
     
  13. PCpraiser100 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,062 (0.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    68
    OMG does this mean I have to upgrade to another motherboard once it arrives? If upgrading is not as easy as BIOS updates I'm going to go nuts!
     
  14. Nitro-Max

    Nitro-Max New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,476 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    239
    Location:
    Great Yarmouth, United Kingdom.{East Anglian Coast
    Depends on price alot too to be fair if there talking stupid money then it wont catch on as much till prices fall
     
  15. TheScavenger New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    326 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    37
    Location:
    Kansas City, MO
    I wish they would come close to the limit of my wallet :cry:
     
  16. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,401 (11.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,700
    the Gb speeds are misleading. they include signaling data. The real speed of SATA-II is 300MB/s, and there most definately are SSD drives out there doing 250MB/s+

    Within 2 years, its very obvious that SSD's will be outperforming SATA-II's 300MB/s limit, so if they release SATA-III this year it gives time for PC's to upgrade at the same rate as SSD's.
     
  17. p3ngwin New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    11 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    a lot of people here seem to be focussing too much on the synching of the timing of the current SSD speeds and the interface.
    worry less about TODAYS SSD speeds and the interface they use, and instead realise that SSD speeds are increasing incredible fast compared to the interface they use.

    SATA 1.5gb/s=2001
    SATA 3.0gb/s=2005
    SATA 6.0gb/s=2008

    as you can see it takes a while for the transmission standard to evolve (although looks to be evolving faster).
    SSD's have been around in various forms since the 1990's, with the military and specialist companies enjoying the cutting edge technology of the time compared to disk platter based drives.

    compare the SATA spec evolution with the evolution of the SSD speeds. where in just the 1st two years (of "consumer" SSD's), where DELL, Apple and Asus were using them.

    the 1st SSD's 2 years ago barely managed 50/25 (read/write).
    today, regardless of price, we already have SINGLE (not raid) SSD's that can handle nearly 300Mb/s transfers!

    the evolution of the drives is outpacing transfer mechanisms. it seems the tables have turned as for many years single hard drives never approached their interface limits.
    this is why the SATA spec can't evolve fast enough for us.

    it matters less that it seems to be overkill for TODAY's SSD's and is more about future proofing us. it will be another few years before the storage device interface spec evolves to accommodate us, and by then we can only imagine what speeds we'll be transferring.
     
  18. DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    Every SATA drive has the full bandwidth anyway, so it won't matter. Unless you're using multiplexers, which few people actually do. It's only interesting for RAMdrives and future SSD's. Normal harddrives won't get that fast in the coming years.
     
  19. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,401 (11.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,700
    I do! i has a port multiplier.

    Anywho, dan is definately right on single drives, except for SSD's. SSD's are definately already 250MB+, and reaching the limits of SATA-II
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2009
  20. kyle2020 Guest

    6GB Burst / peak? So not 100% of the time like most would like to believe haha.
     
  21. Flyordie

    Flyordie New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,870 (0.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    247
    loool
    SSDs have already successfully gone past the 375MB/s barrier...
    SATA is so slow right now compared to current generation SSDs (only 1 company currently has current gen SSDs, and thats Micron Technology, Intel is still last gen)
    They have a current sustained write speed of over 600MB/s. Add another SSD (they are expandable) and get 1100-1200MB/s sustained Writes...
    So, its coming in line with Micron's release date for their SSDs (1Q-2Q 09).
    Hope ya'll enjoy your el-cheapo Intel SSDs. ;-) Slow pokes.
     
  22. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,401 (11.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,700
    cough. seen your system specs lately? :nutkick:
     
  23. Woody112

    Woody112 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    Messages:
    562 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    74
    Location:
    Florida
    :roll: That shit's funny
     
  24. Jizzler

    Jizzler

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,442 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    644
    Location:
    Geneva, FL, USA
    Lol, I've been reading this argument since ATA33 vs ATA66 ;)
     
  25. Hayder_Master

    Hayder_Master

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,177 (2.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    Location:
    IRAQ-Baghdad
    i think maybe new technology release for ssd maybe like raid give us high bandwidth
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page