- Joined
- Jan 23, 2013
- Messages
- 156 (0.04/day)
- Location
- Australia
Processor | Intel Core i7 9700KF @4.4 |
---|---|
Motherboard | Gigabyte Z390M Gaming |
Cooling | Noctua NH-U9S / NA-FC1+Noctua and Be Quiet! Fans |
Memory | Corsair LPX DDR4 32GB 3200MHZ |
Video Card(s) | Asus Dual RTX 3060 12GB |
Storage | Samsung 970 EVO 500GB NVMe |
Display(s) | MSI G244F + Dell P1914S |
Case | Be Quiet! Pure Base 500 Black |
Audio Device(s) | A] Onboard > Logitech Z623 B] Denon DRA-295 > JM Lab Cobalt 810 |
Power Supply | EVGA G+ 650W with APC 1400VA UPS |
Mouse | Asus Strix Carry + Corsair MM300 |
Keyboard | Ducky One 2 TKL MX Silver |
Software | Win 10 64Bit |
I understand that 120fps on 120hz would look best, but unless you have 3 or 4 680's i cant keep 120fps in todays games with high/ultra settings.
So i was thinking if i used nvidias adaptive vsync, at half refresh rate, then games would be capped at 60fps, which is a framerate i can hold with high/ultra settings, but the monitor would be operating at 120hz.
So, is runnning 60fps at 120hz much better then 60fps at 60hz?
Also if my gpu's are processing higher then 60fps, they run hotter, and increase gpu usage, so i wouldnt wanna run 120fps even if i could i reckon.
So i was thinking if i used nvidias adaptive vsync, at half refresh rate, then games would be capped at 60fps, which is a framerate i can hold with high/ultra settings, but the monitor would be operating at 120hz.
So, is runnning 60fps at 120hz much better then 60fps at 60hz?
Also if my gpu's are processing higher then 60fps, they run hotter, and increase gpu usage, so i wouldnt wanna run 120fps even if i could i reckon.