1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

7970 Not a problem this time

Discussion in 'AMD / ATI' started by Shurakai, Mar 8, 2012.

  1. Shurakai

    Shurakai New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    233 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Location:
    Australia, SA
    Hey guys n' gals.

    Just thought I would post some observations between the drivers AMD are releasing these days for the 7970

    I'll get right to the point and suggest you use RC11 unless there's a problem between them and your card, because they are far and away the best for gaming. I'll provide some examples below, just Saints Row for the moment until I do some more driver shuffling.

    Latest 12.2 WHQL
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Old faithful RC11 (Apart from texture/landmass disappearing in TERA)
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    A bit odd nighttime is only increased by 4fps, but look at that daytime difference, 20fps, that's just sad. I chose this location due to it being a fairly intensive safe house for fps, while driving around RC11 sticks to 55-60, while 12.2 sinks to 30-45.

    If anyone else would like to post comparisons, feel free, I'll get to work on some more examples.
  2. WiL11o6 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    6 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    What resolution is that? Just wondering because I've never played Saints Row and 55-60 seems kind of low when BF3 Ultra'd gets low 40fps (min) and 65fps (avg) in 1080p and that's the most intensively graphical game at the moment.

    But back on topic, yes I still think the RC11 are the best and is what I am using for my 7970s. It has worked fine since the day I bought my cards, albeit it took me 2 full days to get the drivers to work, but it as worked flawlessly ever since then. New beta drivers have been coming out and I've been ignoring them all since it's working fine now. Every game has been 60fps+ with no stutter so that's all that matters to me. Until an official driver comes that improves the games I play then I'll make a switch.
  3. Shurakai

    Shurakai New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    233 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Location:
    Australia, SA
    1920x1080 :)

    I don't have an opinion on it, but SRTT is labeled as a fairly mediocre console port, plus this kinda fps is a breeze for the 560Ti in my mates comp with very similar specs.
  4. FierceRed

    FierceRed New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    224 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    42
    Location:
    Toronto, ON
    Hey guys,

    Just wanted to say regarding Saints 3rd, I've played it multiple times and asking what resolution you're playing it at is the wrong question.

    First off, Saints 3rd has a plethora of DX10+ graphical options and since the people labeling it a mediocre port don't know anything about what's necessary to insert DX10-11 features into a DX9 game, it's best not to believe the judgment of the masses unless you're interested in looking into PC port history and then judging it yourself. Straight FPS upon load aren't everything and Saints 3rd is an above average port, at least in this display options context.

    Secondly, I've personally verified that Saints 3rd will auto-adjust your settings (usually Shadows) in order to shoot for and maintain 60FPS if you set the profile to "Custom" and then attempt to set each factor yourself. I've seen this when I wanted "Ultra" settings but with AA @ 4x rather than the preset 8x. It changed Shadows from High to Medium on me after about 10 mins of play.

    I mention this because it's possible that the game simply hadn't seen you move yet (since your screenshots are in Cribs) and adjusted whatever it adjusts in the background to get your FPS up. So whether you're using the "Ultra" or "Custom" presets might be a factor in all this.

    I'm not sure if they patched this out on Feb. 22nd as I haven't seen the auto-adjustments since then (though I haven't really been looking), but if you're interested in another datapoint, I'd like to see the WHQL 12.2 in Saints 3rd again, both when you load up into your Crib... then grab a VTOL and fly a quick lap in your Cribs sector, getting low to the ground and letting trees, cars and people render... then back to the Crib and the same window. There might be changes in the FPS and your Custom settings (if you're using Custom) that you wouldn't expect.

    Cheers.
  5. claylomax

    claylomax

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,574 (1.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    255
    Location:
    London
    Are you saying that the drivers provided with the card at release are better than the latest WHQL ones?
  6. Shurakai

    Shurakai New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    233 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Location:
    Australia, SA
    Good idea, I'll make a little recording of them both. Both screenshots are set to Ultra (got this card to max it all out so I see no reason for custom :p)

    The ones supplied with my card were even lower version that RC11, but I never really look back on those after RC11 due to such a huge performance boost (I have one of the very first batch ASUS 7970 DCII)

    Edit: I don't record often, is there a way for FRAPS to record the fps while recording? Doesn't seem to have an option :(
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2012
  7. FierceRed

    FierceRed New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    224 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    42
    Location:
    Toronto, ON
    Doesn't MSI Afterburner do ingame recording better than FRAPS? I've just heard this, I can't help you with the actual execution.
  8. Shurakai

    Shurakai New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    233 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Location:
    Australia, SA
    Well I haven't had any luck recording the fps, but I did remember fraps has a benchmarking mode, completely forgot about it.

    Took me awhile to get these due to the amount of times I had to practice the course and making sure each run had the same time of day.

    Saints Row the Third

    12.2 WHQL (Funny story, these show up as 12.3 if you look under information in CCC)
    Frames 5801
    Time (ms) 120000
    Min 34
    Max 98
    Avg 48.342
    RC11
    Frames 7281
    Time (ms) 120000
    Min 42
    Max 100
    Avg 60.675

    I also tested with Skyrim but the difference is so small it isn't work mentioning, so I guess SRTT doesn't like something changed in the latest drivers. :(

    Anyway, thanks for having a read, any suggestions/comments/etc are awesome.

    Edit: Some Crysis benchmarks

    12.2 WHQL
    10/03/2012 4:47:05 PM - Vista 64
    Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
    DX10 1920x1080, AA=8x, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
    Demo Loops=5, Time Of Day= 9
    Global Game Quality:
    Custom Quality Values:
    VolumetricEffects=VeryHigh
    Texture=VeryHigh
    ObjectDetail=VeryHigh
    Sound=VeryHigh
    Shadows=VeryHigh
    Water=VeryHigh
    Physics=VeryHigh
    Particles=VeryHigh
    Shading=VeryHigh
    PostProcessing=VeryHigh
    GameEffects=VeryHigh
    ==============================================================
    TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
    !TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
    Play Time: 28.05s, Average FPS: 71.29
    Min FPS: 52.65 at frame 1958, Max FPS: 93.84 at frame 995
    Average Tri/Sec: -21098708, Tri/Frame: -295958
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -3.10
    !TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
    Play Time: 25.81s, Average FPS: 77.50
    Min FPS: 52.65 at frame 1958, Max FPS: 93.84 at frame 995
    Average Tri/Sec: -22213298, Tri/Frame: -286625
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -3.20
    !TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
    Play Time: 25.71s, Average FPS: 77.78
    Min FPS: 52.65 at frame 1958, Max FPS: 93.84 at frame 995
    Average Tri/Sec: -22250348, Tri/Frame: -286055
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -3.20
    !TimeDemo Run 3 Finished.
    Play Time: 25.68s, Average FPS: 77.88
    Min FPS: 52.65 at frame 1958, Max FPS: 94.36 at frame 990
    Average Tri/Sec: -22298614, Tri/Frame: -286335
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -3.20
    !TimeDemo Run 4 Finished.
    Play Time: 25.70s, Average FPS: 77.83
    Min FPS: 52.65 at frame 1958, Max FPS: 94.36 at frame 990
    Average Tri/Sec: -22262024, Tri/Frame: -286032
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -3.20
    TimeDemo Play Ended, (5 Runs Performed)
    ==============================================================

    Completed All Tests

    <><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

    10/03/2012 4:47:05 PM - Vista 64

    Run #1- DX10 1920x1080 AA=8x, 32 bit test, Quality: ~~ Overall Average FPS: 77.7475
    RC11
    10/03/2012 4:31:21 PM - Vista 64
    Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
    DX10 1920x1080, AA=8x, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
    Demo Loops=5, Time Of Day= 9
    Global Game Quality: VeryHigh
    ==============================================================
    TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
    !TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
    Play Time: 28.24s, Average FPS: 70.82
    Min FPS: 52.66 at frame 1961, Max FPS: 93.38 at frame 997
    Average Tri/Sec: -20896048, Tri/Frame: -295072
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -3.11
    !TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
    Play Time: 25.74s, Average FPS: 77.69
    Min FPS: 52.66 at frame 1961, Max FPS: 93.58 at frame 134
    Average Tri/Sec: -22273448, Tri/Frame: -286713
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -3.20
    !TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
    Play Time: 25.70s, Average FPS: 77.83
    Min FPS: 52.66 at frame 1961, Max FPS: 93.58 at frame 134
    Average Tri/Sec: -22303068, Tri/Frame: -286561
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -3.20
    !TimeDemo Run 3 Finished.
    Play Time: 25.68s, Average FPS: 77.90
    Min FPS: 52.66 at frame 1961, Max FPS: 95.98 at frame 105
    Average Tri/Sec: -22314102, Tri/Frame: -286461
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -3.20
    !TimeDemo Run 4 Finished.
    Play Time: 25.68s, Average FPS: 77.87
    Min FPS: 52.66 at frame 1961, Max FPS: 95.98 at frame 105
    Average Tri/Sec: -22343490, Tri/Frame: -286914
    Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -3.19
    TimeDemo Play Ended, (5 Runs Performed)
    ==============================================================

    Completed All Tests

    <><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

    10/03/2012 4:31:21 PM - Vista 64

    Run #1- DX10 1920x1080 AA=8x, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 77.8225
    Edit2: Heaven benchmarks

    12.2 WHQL
    [​IMG]
    RC11
    [​IMG]
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2012
  9. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    11,579 (4.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,267
    Only thing i can really say is if ur pal u keep on referring to is running a diff os such as 7 64bit u might wanna change. Also unstable overclocks can cause troubles.
  10. Shurakai

    Shurakai New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    233 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Location:
    Australia, SA
    That Crysis benchmark says Vista just because it's old and wasn't updated after Win7's release, and the test is running in 32bit due to the steam version of Crysis not having a 64 executable :(, also my tiny overclock on my CPU is all i have and that's stable as a rock. Nice fresh OS install too due to me liking fresh installs after SSD firmware updates; man that crucial update was awesome, so much performance increase (Yeah, bit slow I know, been out for ages)
  11. claylomax

    claylomax

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,574 (1.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    255
    Location:
    London
    Really? Oh man, that's an epic fail.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page