1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

9-watt Sempron 2100+ on the way

Discussion in 'News' started by Jimmy 2004, May 31, 2007.

  1. Jimmy 2004

    Jimmy 2004 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2005
    Messages:
    5,491 (1.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    267
    Location:
    England
    Ok, a Sempron is never going to win any prizes for performance, but AMD’s latest addition its embedded processor line is a new Sempron 2100+ with a TDP rating of a mere 9-watts. The embedded CPU uses socket S1 and will be ideal for low-cost fanless systems that require moderate processing power without overheating or running up a huge power bill. Admittedly it won’t be of much use in gaming machines or servers, but it should be capable of simple office tasks and web browsing, plus it’s the first embedded CPU to feature AMD64 technology which may give it a slight edge in some environments. The new processor is compatible with AMD’s M690T chipset, with AAEON and Arbor offering boards that are compatible with the CPU. No details of pricing or availability are given, although this will be mainly intended for manufactures to integrate into products rather than end users.

    Source: DailyTech
     
  2. KennyT772

    KennyT772 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2005
    Messages:
    3,585 (1.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    103
    9W!? god...why cant they do that with the r600's...
     
  3. kwchang007

    kwchang007 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,979 (1.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    Location:
    Severn, MD, USA.
    wow....6-7 hours on a standard 6 cell batteries for laptops doesn't look to far off.
     
  4. mandelore

    mandelore New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,251 (1.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    152
    Location:
    UK-small Village in a Valley Near Newcastle
    bloody hell.. thought 40+ was good.. nice
     
  5. freaksavior

    freaksavior To infinity ... and beyond!

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Messages:
    8,069 (2.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    907
    Nice!!! :D
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  6. jocksteeluk

    jocksteeluk New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,457 (0.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    46
    Location:
    The 13th room on the 13th floor of the 13th buildi
    for the energy saved on the cpu no doubt the gpu will make up for it.
     
  7. kwchang007

    kwchang007 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,979 (1.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    Location:
    Severn, MD, USA.
    ehh i don't think so. with any sempron stock, it's pretty hard to go and really run a good game. if they do make this into a mobile solution, it's almost guarnteed that it will be integrated graphics, or low end dedicated. this isn't meant to replace the turion, now if it could preform like turion and have a TDP of 9 watts, that would be amazing.
     
  8. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,651 (13.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,042
    This is great, AMD is heading in the right direction! I really can't wait for some full-fledge AMD designed graphics cards!
     
  9. Fox34

    Fox34 New Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,049 (0.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    98
    Location:
    Venice
    Thats crazy, you can build 100% passive cooling system and still run cooler than active air cooled systems. In a budget laptop this would be great! And even though the performance is lacking, you could OC this bad boy without any heat :toast:
     
  10. SkylinGTR26

    SkylinGTR26 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Messages:
    67 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    oh yes, the OCing on this sucker would be AMAZING!
    W/ aircooling you could pull of some extremely crazy stunts :)
     
  11. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,797 (3.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    546
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    Embedded? Does that mean its integrated into the motherboard or is this standard cpu fare?

    also, what socket is S1? is that supposedly their new socket?

    BTW. Nice going AMD. Now, if only you could make your graphics cards that low power consuming
     
  12. Fox34

    Fox34 New Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,049 (0.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    98
    Location:
    Venice
    Dude, imagine that thing on water, send some serious Volts to it, this Sempron has potential, basically just to see how far we can tweak it:toast: (alright some one get it so we can get a thread about tweaking it :D)
     
  13. PVTCaboose1337

    PVTCaboose1337 Graphical Hacker

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    9,513 (3.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,142
    Location:
    San Antonio, Texas
    They are bound to be cheap... so I'm sure you guys will buy two or three and be like "oh man 4000volts was too much?"
     
  14. tkpenalty New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,958 (2.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Location:
    Australia, Sydney
    LOL.

    9W = no need for any cooling :roll:
     
  15. PVTCaboose1337

    PVTCaboose1337 Graphical Hacker

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    9,513 (3.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,142
    Location:
    San Antonio, Texas
    You know stuff is bad when the cooling cost 10x the processor price...
     
  16. FAXA New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Messages:
    236 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    AMD has the upper hand on this Energy efficient thing :D:p
     
  17. mandelore

    mandelore New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,251 (1.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    152
    Location:
    UK-small Village in a Valley Near Newcastle
    hmmm, what about a multi-core solution using this cpu? the thermal output would still be crazy low
     
  18. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    You could squezze 4 cores in there, and still have less heat output than the lowest current dual cores. That would rock! :rockout:
     
  19. FAXA New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Messages:
    236 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Except it wouldn't be as powerful :( but its a nice idea :D.

    Good for a simple server for a house or small business. Hey you could get 8 cores out of that and it would still be lower than a Athlon X2 3800.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page