[Ion]
WCG Team Assistant
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2009
- Messages
- 13,391 (2.51/day)
- Location
- Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
System Name | Niedersachsen / Ribe / Minsk |
---|---|
Processor | i3 3240 / i7-3520M / 4x Opteron 6376 @ 2.86GHz |
Motherboard | BIOSTAR H61M / HP Q77 / Supermicro H8QG7 |
Cooling | Stock / Stock / 4x 1U G34 |
Memory | 1x8GB / 2x4GB / 4x4GB |
Video Card(s) | GTX260 / Intel HD 4000 / nVidia GT310 |
Storage | 80GB Intel SSD / 256GB Intel SSD / 2x 60GB SSD (RAID1) |
Display(s) | Dell 3007 + HP 2245w / 12.1" 1366x768 / None |
Case | Antec NSK3480 / HP / Supermicro 1U |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard |
Power Supply | Enermax 500W / HP 130W / Supermicro Gold 1400W |
Keyboard | IBM Model M |
Software | Windows 7 (Niedersachsen/Ribe) / Linux Mint 17.2 (Minsk) |
I've found that RICE tends to have the fewest issues if a PC is suddenly powered off without a shutdown. It starts right back where it was, and remembers the amount of runtime put into each work unit. On the other side, HFCC always re-starts the WU, but remembers where it last was :shadedshu
For this reason, I'm switching exclusively to RICE, I'm tired of loosing all of the progress when my computer unexpectedly gets turned off
For this reason, I'm switching exclusively to RICE, I'm tired of loosing all of the progress when my computer unexpectedly gets turned off