1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Activision Blizzard Being Sued for Virtual World Infringement

Discussion in 'News' started by TheMailMan78, Apr 13, 2012.

  1. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,140 (7.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,668
    ShackNews is reporting Activision Blizzard is being sued by Worlds Inc., for violating a patent on virtual worlds. The firm claims that games like Call of Duty and World of Warcraft violate its patent, and are requesting "fair compensation." The patent covers a "system and method for enabling users to interact in a virtual space," reports Games Industry International. That may sound broad, but the company did manage to get an undisclosed settlement out of NCSoft for City of Heroes in 2010. "Technologies created by Worlds have helped the businesses of virtual worlds gaming and the sale of virtual goods to grow into a multi-billion dollar industry," said Worlds CEO Thom Kidrin. "While we are pleased to see that the gaming industry and its rapidly growing customer base have enthusiastically embraced our patented technologies, we deserve fair compensation for their use." No response yet from Activision Blizzard.

    Source: ShackNews
     
    theoneandonlymrk and Kreij say thanks.
  2. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,140 (7.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,668
  3. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,965 (3.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,769
  4. Jizzler

    Jizzler

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,434 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    640
    Location:
    Geneva, FL, USA
    Wrong move Worlds Inc. If you thought Trayon Martin brought the "outcry", just wait until millions of WoW players descend on your office to eat the flesh of your employees.
     
  5. Kreij

    Kreij Senior Monkey Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    13,881 (4.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,616
    Location:
    Cheeseland (Wisconsin, USA)
    Crikey ... the abstract alone covers just about every 3D MMO in existance and all dedicated servers for 3D games too.
     
  6. yogurt_21

    yogurt_21

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,419 (1.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    575
    Location:
    AZ
    no crap, if they win this the gaming industry is in deep s.
     
  7. digibucc

    digibucc

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Messages:
    4,925 (2.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,493
    though there is a lot there it does all seem pretty general. ncsoft may have just been paying a nuisance fee. maybe blizzard will do the same but i doubt there's much merit to the claims.
    i would like to see what "Technologies created by Worlds" they are referring to other than the vague and pretty obvious description of how a virtual world could function.
     
  8. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,741 (1.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    980
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    Patent system is a big massive fail and should just die in a current form. What, should i patent vending machines inside games and collect royalties for that? C'mon, get real.
     
    blibba says thanks.
  9. araditus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    172 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Look at the filing date, just months after everquest I think, do you think they had the foresight of knowing just what MMOs would become, if so, I think they deserve all they can get for calling it and putting their claim on it first, imo, (thats the investor professional side of me coming out)

    (now for the gaming human side) I think it sucks that you can patent this way, I mean it seems like they have patented a rudimentary thing. Unless there is a certain coding structure, but this kind of patent reminds me of slide to unlock
     
  10. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    13,015 (4.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,638
    another lame ass claim
     
  11. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,140 (7.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,668
    I agree its lame. But its valid. I mean they did call it almost perfectly (the MMO) back in 1996.
     
  12. yogurt_21

    yogurt_21

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,419 (1.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    575
    Location:
    AZ
    actually that could invalidate the patent based on prior art argument. Were I Activision Blizzard, that's exactly what I would do.
     
  13. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,140 (7.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,668
    Its not the intellectual property thats in question. Its the concept of execution.

    In simple terms its not the design of the car thats in question. Its the idea of the car itself.

    Its a tough legal fight from both sides IMO. I can't believe I'm rooting for Activision......but I am. However I do believe Worlds Inc. is right in their claim sadly.
     
    yogurt_21 says thanks.
  14. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,461 (4.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,264
    dumb.
     
    Mussels, AsRock and digibucc say thanks.
  15. xBruce88x

    xBruce88x

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,420 (1.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    584
    ... sounds like a virtual Rambus to me
     
    More than 25k PPD
  16. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,792 (3.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,348
    Even if it's valid they shouldn't have waited so long. But they did and now it's to late.
     
  17. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    13,015 (4.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,638
    all these companies that we never heard of pull this shit all the time because they just want to cash in on someone elses success
     
    Isenstaedt says thanks.
  18. Sp33d Junki3

    Sp33d Junki3

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2012
    Messages:
    200 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13
    Stupid claim. only reason to sue Blizzard/Activision is they are a very big money company.
    They might as well sue, Sony, Square Enix, Microsoft, Codemasters, Funcom, Gravity, Turbine... and many others that all have MMO games.

    This is a wasted lawsuit, that they 100% will lose.
     
  19. Inceptor

    Inceptor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    497 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    119
    The lesson here, create a company, file a patent with a broad application, then sue other companies for patent infringement in order to make money.
    Only in the United States of America would patent trolling be allowed and considered a legitimate form of business.
    What a waste.
     
    tomkaten says thanks.
  20. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,140 (7.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,668
    I'm not so sure its a broad description. Its honestly pretty detailed. It gonna be a challenge if Activision Blizzard fight it.
     
  21. Kreij

    Kreij Senior Monkey Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    13,881 (4.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,616
    Location:
    Cheeseland (Wisconsin, USA)
    Well yeah, doesn't make sense to sue a very small money company. :D

    They probably will.

    Depends on the courts and those involved.
     
  22. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,140 (7.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,668
    Exactly. This is a precedence case. If they win this case the others will be easy pickings.
     
  23. Mistral

    Mistral

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2008
    Messages:
    410 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    58
    Location:
    Montreal
    BS. MUD, Ultima Online and tons of others would like to call "previous art" on a lot of the "points" in that patent. Slapping the Z axis as your claim to fame is far more than simply lame.

    Frigging US patent system needs a very serious overhaul.
     
  24. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,140 (7.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,668
    Ultima Online didn't come out until 1997. MUD doesn't use 3d environments. Meridian 59 might be able to make an argument but the studio no longer exists. (Archetype Interactive) Who ever owns that IP will be good shape. Other people.....not so much.
     
    Last edited: Apr 13, 2012
  25. Inceptor

    Inceptor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    497 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    119
    They 'won' against City of Heroes, they already have precedent, that's why they're going after the giant in the MMO industry that is Activision Blizzard. If they win that one, all other lawsuits vs the other MMO companies will likely go to private settlements as soon as the lawsuits are filed.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page