1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD A-Series APUs Tested Against Sandy Bridge CPUs at Gaming on IGP

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, May 11, 2011.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,224 (11.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,580
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    What happens when you pit Intel's "Visually Smart" Sandy Bridge processors against Radeon-enriched AMD Fusion A-Series accelerated processing units? They do terribly at gaming on integrated graphics. Surprise! That is notwithstanding the fact that AMD is pitching its A-Series Fusion APUs to be a lot more than CPUs with embedded GPUs, they're pitched to be processors that make lower-mainstream graphics pointless, and to alter the software ecosystem to be more GPGPU intensive, so applications could benefit from the over 500 GFLOPs of computation power the 400 stream processor DirectX 11 GPU brings to the table.

    A leaked presentation slide shows AMD's performance projections for the A-Series GPU, tests included GPU-heavy DirectX 10 titles such as Crysis Warhead and Borderlands; as well as DirectX 11 ready titles such as Dirt 2. AMD's quad-core A8-3850, A8-3650 and A8-3450 were included alongside Intel's dual-core Sandy Bridge Core i3-2100, and quad-core Core i5-2300, Core i5-2500K. The Atom-competitive E350 Zacate dual-core was also in the comparision, perhaps to show that it is nearly as good as Intel's much higher segment Core series processors at graphics.

    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    30 frames per second (FPS) is considered "playable" limit by some tech journalists, but AMD created a range between 25 and 30 FPS to define what's playable. Each of the three A-Series chips scored above 25 FPS in every test, while the A8-3650 and 3850 reached/crossed the 30 FPS barrier. Going by the test results, AMD certainly achieved what it set out to, which is to use its immense GPU-engineering potential to lift up its CPU business. The A-Series APUs should make a formidable option for home desktop buyers who require strong graphics for casual gaming, cost the same as Intel's dual-core Sandy Bridge, and give four x86-64 cores for the same price. AMD's new A-Series Fusion APUs will launch in early June.

    Source: DonanimHaber
    Last edited: May 11, 2011
  2. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,157 (5.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,959
    Location:
    Home
    Oh god, I can't believe this is happening ...
  3. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,224 (11.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,580
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    I know, I've been seen levitating farm animals here, too.
  4. WhiteLotus

    WhiteLotus

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    6,530 (2.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    847
    They'll be good in a HTPC if you have no graphics card I guess. Or straight out the box computers like Dell may benefit from these.
  5. devguy

    devguy

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,239 (0.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    171
    Location:
    SoCal
    At what resolution were the playable frame-rates rendered?

    But regardless, I believe these will impact the laptop market most of all. It's amazing how many nice laptops have a "powerful" Intel Core i5/i7, and have no discreet graphics chip alongside them (either due to heat or price). While these APUs will still likely be behind Nehalem in CPU performance, let's be honest in that for >80% of potential computer purchasers, the performance a Phenom II offers is more than sufficient!

    In desktop land, if you say buy a Sandy Bridge prebuilt and later decide you wanna do some gaming, then go buy yourself a PCIe graphics card and install it. No problem. However, in laptop land, if you don't buy your laptop with gaming in mind from the get-go, you're screwed, and have to buy a new one. The Llano chip helps to rectify such problems.
    Last edited: May 11, 2011
  6. yogurt_21

    yogurt_21

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,352 (1.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    549
    Location:
    AZ
    my guess is 720P.
  7. TheLostSwede

    TheLostSwede

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    928 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    163
    Looks fake, there's no i5-2300k....
  8. mamisano New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    43 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Hmm, the second slide indicates the A series APUs will be 25, 35, and 45 watts? Can that be correct??
  9. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,224 (11.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,580
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    I take that's 2500K. AMD press decks are typo-prone.
  10. T3RM1N4L D0GM4

    T3RM1N4L D0GM4

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Messages:
    186 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    38
    :shadedshu useless comparison... do want cpu bench NOW

    :mad:
  11. Harlequin_uk New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Messages:
    123 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Location:
    UK
  12. blibba

    blibba

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    829 (0.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    183
    Location:
    Oxford, UK
    What does the nomenclature mean?

    Is the A8-3650 an 8 core at 3.65GHZ? I presume not...
  13. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,758 (4.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,800
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    I do bleive Fusion is quad CPU with onboard 6550 GPU? I am very interested to see how Crossfire performance works with discrete GPUs...will we get decent Tri-Fire perforamnce now, or will this be restricted to a single discrete VGA?
  14. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,157 (5.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,959
    Location:
    Home
    I don't think AMD has released the naming scheme yet.

    I am not sure which model number it corresponds to, but 400 stream processors correspond to 5570 in 5xxx generation speak, or 6450/6470/6550/6570 depending on how they rescale the graphics card naming system. We will get to play with crossfire though.
  15. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,758 (4.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,800
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    I think they have...

    http://www.techpowerup.com/145064/AMD-Llano-Fusion-APU-to-Feature-Radeon-HD-6550-Graphics.html


  16. devguy

    devguy

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,239 (0.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    171
    Location:
    SoCal
    No octal cores in the Llano lineup. But I agree it is confusing how they named them, why not A2/A3/A4 for dual/tri/quad? But whatever...

    And whether the suffix refers to clock speed remains to be seen. However, I doubt it because having a prefix that makes little sense and a suffix that makes perfect sense makes no sense. :cool:
    Last edited: May 11, 2011
    TheLaughingMan says thanks.
  17. Jonap_1st

    Jonap_1st New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    288 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13
    Location:
    South Green Jakarta
    ohh well, this will decrease boring thread like : "how can i play crysis on my laptop?"

    :eek:

    useless??

    some of us already knew that sandy bridge do well better than Llano on cpu's performance. but the point AMD making this APU is to make balance between general processor execution as well as 3D geometry processing.

    some people do want play a game on playable framerates on their laptop or desktop with IGP, that we already know some of SB's laptops and their desktop IGP line-up still struggle to do it..
  18. D4S4

    D4S4

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    697 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    75
    Location:
    Zagreb, Croatia
    at first i was skeptical about integrating gpus into cpus, but then it struck me - assign physical simulation to them and make at least me happy.
  19. spynoodle New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2010
    Messages:
    27 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    I somehow doubt this. A lot.
  20. meirb111 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    184 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    real test is the price for amd

    real test is the price for amd's apu if a quad apu with 400 shaders will cost less than a quad cpu+6570 for example it could be very successful
  21. OneCool

    OneCool

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Messages:
    843 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    66
    Location:
    Look behind you!!
    I would like to see a dual socket motherboard four these APUs.

    Dual quadcore (or 8 core!!!) CPUs and Crossfire the built in GPUs?


    That sounds like it would sell
  22. Jizzler

    Jizzler

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,393 (1.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    633
    Location:
    Geneva, FL, USA
    +1!

    You sir, are my new friend!
  23. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,886 (0.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Location:
    Singapore
    Darn it AMD I just lost a bet! I was betting that DNF would come before the Fusion APUs!
    Heh joking aside congratulations to the AMD team. I know a lot of people were waiting anxiously for these :D
  24. Easo

    Easo

    Joined:
    May 19, 2009
    Messages:
    823 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    78
    Location:
    Latvia
    Another reason for Intel to kill their crappy gpus...
    NC37 says thanks.
  25. Assimilator

    Assimilator

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    579 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    [H] posted a review of 6990 + 6970 (essentially 6970 tri-fire) a while back and they found it scaled excellently, beating out GTX 580 SLI in a number of scenarios and at a much lower price point.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page