1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD A-Series "Kaveri" Performs Better with Dual-Rank DIMMs: Report

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jan 23, 2014.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,201 (11.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,572
    Location:
    Bangalore, India
    AMD's A-Series "Kaveri" APUs perform tangibly better on system with dual-rank memory modules, according to an investigative report by ComputerBase.de. According to the report, the chip yields its best memory bandwidth when both its memory channels are populated with 2-rank DIMMs each. Either that, or four modules with one rank each. The report also found out that Kaveri can take advantage of DDR3-2400 as advertised. There was a 15.2 percent jump in performance between DDR3-1866 and DDR3-2400.

    An unreliable way of checking whether a DIMM has two ranks is by looking at whether both sides of its PCB has DRAM chips; a reliable way of doing that, however, is using software such as AIDA64 (Motherboard\SPD tab), which lists out number of ranks, and number of banks per rank; and of course, looking up the specs sheet. The reason visual inspection of a DIMM is not reliable these days is because of the way modern DRAM chips are designed. There are instances of DIMMs with chips on just one side, yet 2 ranks. Find more performance numbers at the source.

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Source: ComputerBase.de
  2. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,382 (3.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,934
    Location:
    Mexico
    I suppose Radeon memory is guaranteed to be 2 rank then.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  3. medo New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2013
    Messages:
    14 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    What ???

    Sorry but i am IT personnel for 2 years, and i always know that Single RANK RAM is much better + stable + pricier + best option for servers, cause the data flow circuits only one lap instead of 2.

    And another way of finding out single RANK, is looking at the spec for this term 1Rx8 (single rank, 8 chips so if its an 4 GB, each chip will be 512MB ), while Dual RANK will be 2Rx16 (16 chips with 256MB)

    So sorry this report done by ComputerBase.de is load of bullocks, cause dual rank RAM are cheaper, and are preferred for desktop people, and most manufacturers use dual rank, the maximum single rank single DIMM currently is 4 GB, and bare in mind most 4 GB are dual RANK, you need to search really hard for Single RANK, also Single RANK RAM sticks to its stable non oc freq, so is will be DDR3 1333 1.5 9-9-9-24, cause you wont be able to find OC single rank more than 1600, trust me, and if you dont head to Kingston website, and to a detail reading on there DImms, they have great support and PDF file for each DIMM.
  4. LeonVolcove

    LeonVolcove

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2014
    Messages:
    130 (0.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    I dont really understand what is this article is all about, can somebody tell me?
  5. Sihastru

    Sihastru

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    354 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    67
    Location:
    You are here.
    Apparently, AMD CPUs (APUs, whatever) do a little better with memory that has chips on both sides of the module, usually 2 x 8 = 16 chips, then with memory that has chips on only one side of the module, usually 1 x 8 = 8 chips. And, unless there's something wrong with the AMD memory controller inside their CPUs (APUs, whatever) this shouldn't be happening.

    When there's a surplus of high density chips manufacturers will switch to single sided modules, but usually, they stick to double sided. For example there are some Kingston modules that can do really well frequency wise because they are in fact high density and single sided.
    LeonVolcove says thanks.
  6. grndzro7 New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2011
    Messages:
    7 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Wow 2 years IT pro....Have you considered that perhaps Kaveri has more rank selectors to use the DDR channels? It is a brand new on die chipset and IMC U know.
    NeoXF says thanks.
  7. LeonVolcove

    LeonVolcove

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2014
    Messages:
    130 (0.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    i am really noob about this thing, to make it simple do you mean 2 stick 8 GB is better than 1 stick 8 GB? then how about 2 stick 4 GB?
  8. Exceededgoku

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    409 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    24
    Oh dear, 1 stick with 4GB of memory on each side of the physical RAM (on an 8GB DDR RAM stick)... So it's basically saying double-sided RAM stick works more efficiently with these APU's.

    Most high capacity memory these days is this way anyway...
    LeonVolcove says thanks.
  9. LeonVolcove

    LeonVolcove

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2014
    Messages:
    130 (0.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    +1 Thanks buddy, i stick with 2 stick 4 GB 1866MHz for now until have enough money for upgrade
  10. Vinska

    Vinska

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,381 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,186
    Location:
    Kaunas, Lithuania
  11. micropage7

    micropage7

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    5,564 (3.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,272
    Location:
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    if your ram has 2 sided memory chips, on the front and on the back of pcb
    so your ram has 8 memory chips on the front and 8 memory chips on the back, overall you have 16 memory chips on your ram
    you will have better performance
  12. Vinska

    Vinska

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,381 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,186
    Location:
    Kaunas, Lithuania
    Not necessarily – these days many Dual-Rank DIMMs have only 8 chips and all on one side. As the OP noted:
    Crunching for Team TPU
  13. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,163 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    170
    ......yeah......next amd will announce that their apu's operate better /faster/longer/cooler when used with closed loop water coolers as opposed to the standard h.s.f.
    Jizzler says thanks.
  14. _Flare

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2010
    Messages:
    12 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Single vs. Dual Rank

    Retrieved from "Single Sided" and "Dual Sided" memory, many users have already heard. The terminology expresses whether the memory chip is fitted on both sides with storage modules, or only one side. Single Rank and Dual Rank in contrast, can not visually recognize. Decisive here is the internal structure - and can be "dual rank" in both single as well as double-sided modules "Single Rank" or. A visual cue does not exist.

    An example: If a memory chip eight memory lines, eight chips are needed to achieve the 64 bit. A single-rank module needs therefore eight chips. If the memory is on the other hand designed as a dual-rank, twice as many chips have to be provided to two times to allow 64 bits. With the same capacity as much module memory chips would be sufficient to double the half-capacity in order to achieve this goal.

    Normally it makes no difference whether installed in a system single-rank, dual-rank or even quad-rank memory. It is only important that the memory controller can address all the benches on all modules.

    The problem for the end user: at Kaveri makes the memory module setup employed a difference - but how the modules are commercially available to detect?

    Not always distinguishable: Single-and dual-rank memory

    If you're lucky, can be found in the name of the module, the name "1R" for single-rank or "2R" for Dual Rank. This is usually not the case. The technical data sheets to the memory module does not always help further partially, however.

    http://translate.google.de/translat...en/2014/amds-kaveri-und-der-speicher/&act=url
  15. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,163 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    170
    e="grndzro7, post: 3053926, member: 95403"]Yea yea we get it you hate AMD and like to troll any positive AMD news.[/quote]

    o_O..... it profits me nothing to hate Amd or to rep any other company. What i find funny, ridiculous or Redundant is just my opinion
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2014
  16. SIGSEGV

    SIGSEGV

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    504 (0.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    107
    It was investigated by computerbase.de not AMD. So please read again before making any useless comment.



    yeah, you're absolutely trolling here...
  17. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,163 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    170
    yeah, you're absolutely trolling here...[/quote]

    ....ok....... just a little.... but don't want to derail a thread so pay me no mind and carry on. And i'm building a Fm2+ system (In my honored Fractal case....waiting on board and c...apu)so no... while i do find Amd Keystone Cop-ish at time I recognize the ideas behind their endeavors and applaud them for that.
  18. grndzro7 New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2011
    Messages:
    7 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    No probs, I'll edit some things now.
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2014
  19. Deadlyraver

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2011
    Messages:
    265 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    23
    Me like.
  20. Patriot

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    159 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14
    Location:
    Republic of Texas


    Server side its easy to detect... as you mentioned the rank is listed on the module...
    Peasant dimms not so much. You would be lucky if it is listed in manufacturer spec.

    Depending on the IMC... 2R could be faster but traditionally hasn't been. (is visualizing SSD and bandwidth per nand chip, more chips more bandwidth. But if same number of chips... )
    1t vs 2t ... now that makes a difference :)

    Now... Here is the issue with their test. It is 4 dimms vs 2. 4 dimms is slower than 2, even if they are SR vs 2x DR. Not very scientific. Let me clarify incase some of you want to jump on that. >1 dimm per channel slows things down.

    If you are running Dual channel... you should run on 2 dimms for optimum performance. I might even place money that 2x SR would be faster than 2x DR... but that would depend on other factors like CAS and 1t vs 2t.

    If you are on servers... you should use ECC for up to 1 dimm per channel and registered if you use >1 dimm per channel for optimum performance.
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2014
  21. Jorge

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2013
    Messages:
    699 (1.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    72
    A couple points in benches or FPS is hardly a tangible performance increase when you're already running at 30+ FPS. The move from 1866 MHz. to 2133 or 2400 MHz. is useful with an APU as the added bandwith helps the GPU segment.
  22. Popocatepetl New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    14 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Why do you even bother posting nonsense like this ? Dual rank modules use separate chip select si9gnals for each rank. This allows them to avoid contention for the memory bus (by driving these signals out of phase with one another), thereby allowing for (slightly) better performance.
  23. Patriot

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    159 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    If this test actually was comparing Apples to Apples you might be able to say that. It is not, it is comparing 2 to 4 DIMMS. In reality ... this is dual rank vs dual rank (dual rank per channel)... all this proves is that 1 dimm/channel is faster than 2 which was already known. Dual rank is still making 2 calls instead of 1... it is not faster than SR.
  24. grndzro7 New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2011
    Messages:
    7 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    If you would notice the charts specify SR/DR(Single rank/Double Rank)
    2 Double rank outperform 2 single rank and 4 single rank.
  25. yogurt_21

    yogurt_21

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,309 (1.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    544
    Location:
    AZ
    memory these days lists the rank on it. you'll see 1R X 8 meaning 1 rank with 8 chips or 2R x 8 2 ranks with 8 chips per rank.

    aida may be faster if the memory is already installed but the memory will say how many ranks it has when you buy it.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page