1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Aiming for 30% Market Share

Discussion in 'News' started by Jimmy 2004, Mar 7, 2007.

  1. Jimmy 2004

    Jimmy 2004 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2005
    Messages:
    5,491 (1.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    267
    Location:
    England
    AMD has reiterated that its main aim at the moment is to achieve a 30% market share in order to break Intel’s monopoly. Speaking at the Morgan Stanley Technology Conference in San Francisco today, Hector Ruiz (chief executive of AMD) said “The environment is very competitive, very competitive. We need to break the monopoly, and for that we’ve got to get above 30% [market share].” Ruiz also announced that AMD was looking likely to fall below its first-quarter sales guidance of between $1.6 billion and $1.7 billion. By the end of 2006, Intel accounted for 74.4% of the overall processor market, with AMD in control of 25.3%, whilst Intel made up 77.7% of server chip sales. AMD has a strong challenge on its hands in the form of Intel’s Core 2 Duo processor, which is becoming more popular among consumers allowing Intel to gradually claw back some of its market share.

    Source: Xbit Labs
     
  2. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    21,047 (6.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,044
    I don't see AMD gaining much market share any time soon.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  3. tigger

    tigger I'm the only one

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    10,187 (3.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,402
    all i can say is,in their dreams
     
  4. Sh00t1st

    Sh00t1st New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    371 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Austin,Texas
    but where does the future lie except within our dreams
     
  5. pt

    pt not a suicide-bomber

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    8,981 (2.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    208
    Location:
    Portugal
    they are selling more on laptops and budget systems, this is very possible :)
     
  6. bruins004 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,480 (0.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    75
    They need to come out with something soon
     
  7. Sh00t1st

    Sh00t1st New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    371 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Austin,Texas
    i think history has shown never to count something out of the fight unless its beat and from what i can see amd isn't beat.
     
  8. Sh00t1st

    Sh00t1st New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    371 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Austin,Texas
    I also think if they just moved to the vertical transistor they could trump intel with innovation alone.
     
  9. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,750 (4.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,571
    intel gained just about all the market share back that amd took from it the past few years. unless amd can comeout with a truly superior product it will never get close.
     
  10. Sh00t1st

    Sh00t1st New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    371 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Austin,Texas
    wouldn't it be funny if intel was cooking the books. and that amd was the leader. jk of coarse
     
  11. J0N

    J0N New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2007
    Messages:
    448 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    England
    More and more companys are putting AMD CPU's in their systems. I'd say 30% is definately possible!
     
  12. HousERaT New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    109 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Clever marketing and corporate doubletalk isn't going to get AMD their 30%. They'll either come out with a superior product which helps them cut into Intel's market or they'll continue to service a very niche audience.
     
  13. JC316

    JC316 Knows what makes you tick

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    9,364 (2.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    914
    I dont know, AMD has not been marketing very well. The Brisbanes came out and hardly anyone knew. With the price drops, budget systems, and better marketing, I think they can get their 30%.
     
  14. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    21,047 (6.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,044
    AMD's only hope for 30% is the contract with Dell. Other than that, they don't really have a chance at making it, but it is good to set goals, it gives them something to shoot for.

    AMD needs to learn that they can't compete based on performance anymore, so they need to start competing in price. Charging $500 for an X2 6000+ that is beat by a $300 E6600 isn't competing in price.

    They are making the same mistakes Intel was when they lost the performance crown, they are still pricing their products like they perform better. Which will cause them to lose market share, not gain it.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  15. Grings

    Grings

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    2,303 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    187
    Location:
    Blighty
    i'd say they could do it IF the new chips perform well, prior to core 2 duo they had a fair share of the ENTHUSIAST market(i.e. gamers etc), probably well over 50% (please note the enthusiast part, obviously intel sold FAR more business & crappy oem stuff)
     
  16. Scavar

    Scavar New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Messages:
    573 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ft Lauderdale, FL
    They can do it with competitive pricing, better advirtisment(Even a fw of the AMD fanboys I know didn't know AMD had a new processor) and coming out with something that completely beats the Core 2 at stock.
     
  17. ChaoticBlankness

    ChaoticBlankness New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    492 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    Location:
    A small crate floating in the Pacific..
    Fellow techPowerUp members, all I can say is this. If the K10 (formerly the K8L) flops... god help AMD.

    If it doesn't flop, we may see a new era of head-to-head fighting between AMD and Intel that can only lead in cheaper faster parts.
     
  18. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,812 (3.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    547
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    I see AMD getting the 30% very soon. Its not too hard for them to do that and eventually Gain more.
     
  19. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (7.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    I agree with WarEagle. You have to remember, most of us are enthusiasts. We see things a bit differently. Our point of view cuts out OEM, server, and budget systems. There's a lot more to be had in those categories, as compared to the gamers and enthusiasts.
     
  20. JC316

    JC316 Knows what makes you tick

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    9,364 (2.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    914
    No God help us. If AMD/ATI goes under, that leaves Intel/Nvidia completely uncontested, so they can charge whatever they want.
     
  21. ChaoticBlankness

    ChaoticBlankness New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    492 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    Location:
    A small crate floating in the Pacific..
    I don't see AMD going under, especially with owning ATi now. However they could return to the status they had back with the K5 and K6... close, but no cigar.
     
  22. Ketxxx

    Ketxxx Heedless Psychic

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    11,510 (3.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    570
    Location:
    Kingdom of gods
    30% is more than possible. AMD just have to be faster off the bat with products and make a big fanfair about what it releases, playing the trump point for each product. For example with the Brisbane, they could of hyped the .065nm process claiming faster, better overclocks with less heat output.
     
  23. AshenSugar

    AshenSugar New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,998 (0.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    ashentech.com
    g2 are better clockers then first gen 65nm chips.

    amd is already moving to 45nm and never planed a long stay at 65nm, they are also working on implementing new tech into the chips that they and ibm developed in conjunction.

    and amd isnt going to go under, their cpu buisness is only part of what they sell, they have other markets they service, just as intel and most other large companys do.

    and 30% is easy, they just get a couple more OEM's to ramp up shipments of amd based systems to dealers.

    HP/COMPCRAP
    emachiens
    dell
    acer(last i checked)

    and other OEM's already use amd chips, these hold FAR more market share then home builds and stuff like we build.

    i do agree the 6000+ is overpriced, but meh, thats what you get with new top end chips, from bouth companys.

    i will hold out for k10 kuma and rana :)
     
  24. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,750 (4.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,571
    i dont know if a lot of you guys are seeing the big picture. the only way amd will attain 30 percent or higher is if they can make a product that performs better than intels in comparison and is cheaper and more effecient (ie. uses less power = lower electric bill)

    when do you guys see that happening? especially with intel dropping prices and rolling out more low power cpus that are equal to amds.
     
  25. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (7.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    It really doesn't have everything to do with performance, it does have everything to do with marketing. Remember, the average user isn't likely to notice a difference between, and I'm just pulling an example out of my arse here, an AMD 3800+ X2 and say an Intel E6400 in computers with otherwise identical specs. For surfing and office apps, it just isn't that big of a deal. Gamers, enthusiasts, and a/v content producers are the only ones that will notice a huge difference. (AKA: The people frequenting this forum, and others like it) And last I checked, AMD still had the lead in energy efficiency and price, which can be a huge selling point for the average user. That's not even taking into consideration the OEM and Server markets. It will all boil down to nothing more than marketing strategy on AMD's part.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page