1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Bulldozer A Surprisingly Sell-Out Sales Success. Victims: Phenom II & Athlon II

Discussion in 'News' started by qubit, Dec 3, 2011.

  1. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,821 (4.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,480
    AMD's new Bulldozer "FX" series of processors may be very lacklustre performers in reviewer's benchmarks and have garnered considerable scorn in enthusiast circles, but they're a very good performer for AMD's bottom line. Incredibly, they are selling out as soon as shops get them in stock - and they are not even priced very competitively against Intel's offerings, so perhaps the "It's an 8 core CPU!!" marketing is working well on the uninformed "enthusiast" after all? Mind you, what enthusiast, however uninformed, wouldn't know exactly how these products perform? Every tech website and computer magazine has covered these chips by now. The mind boggles.

    [​IMG]

    Unfortunately, the victims of this unwarranted success are the decent Phenom II & Athlon II processors, which have always been priced very well, giving good value for money and are good sellers. The reason is that the manufacturing plants share equipment between these old 45 nm products and the new 32 nm ones, creating a conflict between them, so one must go. It therefore makes sound business sense for AMD to discontinue selling the old product in favour of the new, expensive one which is flying off the shelves. AMD will stop shipping all Athlon II's and Phenom II's to distributors, but with one exception. The "Zosma" 6 core Phenom II X4 960T will continue to be available until stocks run dry. This has two cores disabled, making it a "quad" core CPU, but with luck they might be unlockable. To state the obvious, if one is considering buying one of these discontinued chips, then they'd better not wait long.

    Source: Nordic Hardware
    Chicken Patty, nt300 and Super XP say thanks.
  2. xtremesv

    xtremesv

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2010
    Messages:
    115 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    Sometimes it's a matter of brand loyalty or novelty curiosity. I value the performance of Intel's CPUs but I keep my sympathy to AMD (it was my first CPU).
  3. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,743 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    538
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    It took me a while to pick up a FX-8120 at a great price. Anywhere you look, these things are selling out fast. They are not bad chips, just mis-understood :D
    Good move for AMD and consumers.
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
  4. naoan New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    304 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    62
    Whatever the reason for this peculiarity, I hope this make Intel feels threatened.
    Yo_Wattup and Super XP say thanks.
  5. JustaTinkerer New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2011
    Messages:
    272 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    71
    Location:
    Scotland

    Hmmm



    More Hmmm

    Note: nothing to do with qubit posting both hes just copying news.
    just incase I get flamed
  6. AthlonX2

    AthlonX2 HyperVtX™

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    7,135 (2.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,642
    Intel doesnt give a shit about what AMD does
    Isenstaedt, Proph3t and El_Mayo say thanks.
  7. D4S4

    D4S4

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    697 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    75
    Location:
    Zagreb, Croatia
    bulldozer lives!!!1!



    i just had to.
  8. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,411 (3.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,947
    Location:
    Mexico
    The FX CPUs managed to beat even the i7-2600K in some benchmarks so I'm pretty sure that for some people the FX are a better buy. Heck, their gaming and general performance isn't bad.

    I don't get where all this disdain comes from. AMD always said that BD was aimed at Core i5 performance, they NEVER said that BD was going to tear Intel a new one but everyone and their mother assumed that when they branded the new CPUs as FX.

    As I've stated in other threads about this, AMD's marketing is the weak link. They must have anticipated that by going by the FX name everyone's expectations would get up considerably, way waaaaaaaayyyy above reality,even if AMD ALWAYS stated that it wasn't the case.

    And this is coming from an ATintel fanboy.
    JrRacinFan and WarEagleAU say thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  9. KieranD

    KieranD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Messages:
    8,003 (3.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    813
    Location:
    Glasgow, Scotland
    The AMD hate is strong with this news poster.
    de.das.dude says thanks.
  10. TheLaughingMan

    TheLaughingMan

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    5,073 (2.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,292
    Location:
    Marietta, GA USA
    My FX-8150 runs great. I don't know what the issue was. The chip may benchmark like crap, but the only real issue is the latest BIOS broke my older Valve games. Lucky for me I gots the Skyrim and BF3 which run like butter baby.
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2011
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
  11. [H]@RD5TUFF

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    5,615 (3.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,707
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    It could just mean supplies are limited, not that people are buying them at record levels, as their performance is crap.
    xenocide says thanks.
  12. GLD

    GLD

    Joined:
    May 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,352 (0.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    136
    My first few rigs were Intel's, long ago. Then I built a oc'ed Barton 2500+ rig and there is no going back for me. AMD is my only choice.
  13. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,411 (3.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,947
    Location:
    Mexico
    That's what I mean. The suckers work, not as fine as people liked to imagine that they would, though, but they don't have show stopping bugs or anything and their performance is good for most tasks. It isn't like your PC is being thrown back a decade or anything.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  14. Kantastic

    Kantastic

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    5,140 (2.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    993
    Wasn't the case back in the Athlon 64 days.
  15. Fx

    Fx

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    500 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    ofcourse they are selling well. we the enthusiasts are the minority. too many people forget this
  16. TRWOV

    TRWOV

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,411 (3.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,947
    Location:
    Mexico
    AMD announced the discontinuation about a month before BD shipped, if I recall correctly. This decision has no direct correlation to their current status.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  17. PaNiC New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    Messages:
    40 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    fanboys are retards, they buy a bad product just because they don't like other company. The bulldozer will make more AMD fanboys then ever be for cause that's how fanboys starts, they buy a bad product, defend it and hate the other company for releasing something better. :laugh:
    WarEagleAU and 1c3d0g say thanks.
  18. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,166 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    181
    limited supplies = easier to sell out & Hey I got an 8 core
    Still ...the bottom line is its your money, buy what ever makes you happy.
    [H]@RD5TUFF says thanks.
  19. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,700 (6.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,861
    I think their weak link was letting a computer design a new processor from the ground up for them instead of just taking what they already had(Phenom II) and shrinking it to 32nm and adding 2 more cores. They would have save themselves huge amounts of R+D money, and huge amounts of time that they could have used to get the processor out at least close to the launch of SandyBridge(or even earlier). They might have even been able to get a processor out that competed with Sandybridge before Sandybridge was even out...
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  20. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,166 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    181
    :wtf:
  21. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,821 (4.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,480
    I don't actually hate AMD or any other company for that matter... ;) Except Rambus. Those f* patent trolls can crash and burn.
    LifeOnMars says thanks.
  22. Fx

    Fx

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    500 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    does being a loyal fan to AMD because Intel uses shady practices make me a fanboy? if so, I guess I can live with that. but if that is so then I can think of lots of names to call Intel fanboys...

    I guess having morals costs me to miss out on some performance- I can live with that just fine. furthermore, it is because of AMD fanboys that AMD has stayed afloat all of these years which has influenced your precious Intel to keep it's ASPs much lower for the majority of their chips

    I get disgusted with people with no backbone
    WarEagleAU and de.das.dude say thanks.
  23. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,821 (4.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,480
    It's my belief that AMD are no better than Intel ethically. They simply have either not been caught or didn't have the opportunity. In short, in Intel's shoes I think they'd be just as ruthless and underhanded, maybe even worse.

    My suggestion is not to let these moral issues get in the way of you buying an Intel CPU to get better performance.
  24. Fx

    Fx

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    500 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I tend to go with my gut especially upon seeing hard evidence laid bare

    I also tend to go for the underdogs. besides if we were all Intel fans then all of our wallets would probably be fucked
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
  25. PaNiC New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    Messages:
    40 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    It takes bigger man to say he got ripped off then to defend it his whole life
    1c3d0g says thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page