1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD C-60 Gets TurboCore to CPU and GPU

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Apr 18, 2011.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,198 (11.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,569
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    AMD is giving its C-series Fusion APUs for netbooks and embedded systems a feature update with its upcoming model, the C-60. The AMD C-60 will have the same default clock speed as the C-50, at 1.00 GHz, but features the AMD TurboCore technology, which can up clock speed to 1.3 GHz when the two cores are loaded. The embedded Radeon GPU also features GPU TurboCore, which boosts engine speed from 276 MHz to 400 MHz. The new dual-core C-60 does all this, while limiting itself to the 9W TDP. AMD will release the new C-60 APU in Q3, 2011.

    [​IMG]

    Source: Macles, Image Courtesy: TFTS
    Apocalypsee and Jack Doph say thanks.
  2. Lionheart

    Lionheart

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2008
    Messages:
    4,021 (1.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    794
    Location:
    Milky Way Galaxy
    Thats a nice feature while keeping the power low
  3. Jack Doph

    Jack Doph

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    508 (0.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    109
    Location:
    Upright down-under (Brisbane, Australia)
    Now, this is the obvious compulsory comment: will they release a C-64 model?
    :p
  4. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,097 (1.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    559
    So with turbo fully on you get pretty close to E-350 speeds for the watts of a C-50......I'm glad I waited. Sounds like what the C-50 lacked to make it a pretty decent netbook APU had been taken care of. Not that it was really lacking, but the doubling of the GPU clock in turbo mode will take care of anyone who could come up with a complaint about it not being fast enough.

    Just wish someone would put one in a netbook with a 10" screen, 2GB ddr3, and something other then Windows Starter..........:banghead:.......for less then $400 and I'd be in.
  5. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,425 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    872
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    I'd prefer C-4 hehe... ...kaboom...
    Jack Doph says thanks.
  6. ToTTenTranz

    ToTTenTranz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Messages:
    865 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    167
    Location:
    Porto
    400MHz GPU for a 9W part, now here's a game-changer.
  7. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,883 (0.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    375
    Location:
    Singapore
    I am guessing the turbo mode is regulated in software, because it is highly unlikely they had he time to change the core design of the CPU in such a short time. In such a case will you need a cpu driver, will it be done through CCC or will you need to install AMD overdrive?
  8. ToTTenTranz

    ToTTenTranz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Messages:
    865 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    167
    Location:
    Porto
    It could be there from the start, but laser-cut in the initial batch of production units until better yields were achieved.

    I don't think a software driver is reliable enough to overclock the Bobcats and the Cedar while maintaining the 9W TDP.
    A ~10% overclock would be safe enough to keep within a tolerable margin of error (as we used to see in CCC's automatic overclock), but a 30% CPU and 44% GPU overclock is nothing to sneeze at. I wouldn't trust the relatively unreliable Windows to manage that.
  9. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,107 (2.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,123
    OOr it was in the die, but through binning they achieved eenough stock to release it.
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  10. DaJMasta

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2005
    Messages:
    479 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    38
    Location:
    Silver Spring, MD
    Maybe by the time this is released there will be half a dozen products on the market that use the C-50....



    I mean, I know that netbook manufacturers have been tight with intel for a while - they have definitely had the better solutions in most cases... but the c-50 seems like an excellent product (cheap, low power, high multimedia performance, on par CPU performance with the higher end dual core atoms) and I have seen it used in either 1 or two computers so far. I don't know what's holding people back... The E-350 has seen a better reception, but there's still only a handful of models that qualify as netbooks that use it. Quite frankly I saw the fusion platform release as a milestone in netbook computing - the first since the introduction of the atom... and no one's using it.

    I know that the n4xx series chips cannot run HD(720p) video in a flash player on their own... am I the only one that thinks HD playback (and having a screen large enough to show 720p) matters in a netbook?
  11. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,097 (1.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    559
    Are the Thubans software controlled? Then I don't think the C-60 is either.

    Not to mention that this is still another quarter away so (from this announcement) they have had probably a little short of 6 months to fix the bugs out of the APUs so they get a better yield. I would be surprised if turbo wasn't there from the beginning but just wasn't feasible because it was buggy, too hot, some combination of several problems that cause them to be inoperable, maybe even worse case kill the APU, etc.

    Maybe someone can point out a month last year but my foggy memory wants to say that it wasn't too long after TSMC declared their buggy 40nm fixed that these were probably already (like Llano did at the beginning of the month) shipping to OEMs so they could have the E and C lines of APUs by CES. Remember it wasn't until the end of February (roughly in the US) that the scarcity of these APUs finally started being fixed. HP was the only OEM that had an AMD APU system available in the month of January. Acer showed up at the beginning of February with their netbook using the C series.
  12. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,541 (2.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    842
    this is a great feature to add to a APU of this calibre, pending it can definitely stay within 9w, cant wait for them to add this to the 18w models too, i bet theres some headroom there.

    the whole architecture has a lot of promise with die shrinks too, wont be long till we have a quad core APU under 20w I'd imagine.
  13. ToTTenTranz

    ToTTenTranz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Messages:
    865 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    167
    Location:
    Porto
    That's Krishna for you, sir.
    wolf says thanks.
  14. cheesy999

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Messages:
    3,881 (2.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    572
    Location:
    UK
    i'll be happy when i can turn on turbo-core like this

    [​IMG]

    and get a result like this

    [​IMG]
    HalfAHertz and wolf say thanks.
  15. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,883 (0.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    375
    Location:
    Singapore
    My first 486 pc had a turbo button. See? Tech really is going around in circles! :D
  16. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,097 (1.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    559
    20w? I think they can do better then 20w with a quad on 28nm. Can't remember exactly but was thinking it would be closer to half that.

    Talk to Mussels. :D

    Yep. They just moved it from the keyboard to...........somewhere. I bet they hid it on the keyboard inside the CPU. :D
  17. MikeX New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2006
    Messages:
    125 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Who still use 80 amd cores GPU?
    We are back to HD 4350:roll:
    Ion 2 clone, but little better...
  18. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,097 (1.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    559
    The 95% of systems sold who don't game hardcore.
  19. MikeX New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2006
    Messages:
    125 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    @mastrdrver

    I think it is the intimidating price. Regardless, I did buy one of those because, it was so tiny and cheap :roll:

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page