1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Cancels Phenom II X4 960T Quad-Core Processors Based on Thuban Die

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, May 12, 2010.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,553 (11.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,644
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    In what could come as a bad news to enthusiasts looking forward to the AMD Phenom II X4 960T "Zosma" quad-core processor, AMD has scrapped plans to release it, at least to the retail market. The chip could still be available to OEM vendors designing their desktop products around it. In a circular to the press, an AMD representative said "I’ve been asked the question about whether there will be a Phenom II X4 960T “Thuban” quad-core by enough individuals, that I think it is a good idea to proactively share the answer to everyone. While there are indeed engineering CPU samples floating around of a 4-core Thuban 960T, I do not expect that processor will be released for general availability. Perhaps it may make its way to OEMs by special request, but that remains to be seen."

    Phenom II X4 960T was a certain release from AMD until now. Various motherboard vendors released beta BIOS that could support the chip, and some enthusiasts with access to engineering samples were even successful in unlocking its disabled cores. The prospect of unlocking disabled cores to yield a six-core processor at the price of a typical quad-core processor is what garnered interest among some sections of the enthusiasts. For AMD, the adverse effect Zosma could have on the sales of more expensive Phenom II X6 seems to have outweighed propagating its new Turbo Core technology at more mainstream prices.

    Source: Legit Reviews
     
    Kei says thanks.
  2. uber_cookie

    uber_cookie

    Joined:
    May 25, 2005
    Messages:
    122 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    30
    Another CPU will probably replace with un-lockable cores once the x6 made the money’s worth.
    Financially related move by AMD?
     
  3. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,225 (11.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,527
    considering hte price difference between the high end x4's and the lowest x6, there was really no price gap for it to go to.

    likely, they just had very few bad x6's and decided to lower the price on them, instead of making an x4 to fill the gap.
     
    pjladyfox and AlienIsGOD say thanks.
  4. [Ion]

    [Ion] WCG Team Assistant

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    11,787 (6.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,889
    Location:
    North Carolina, United States
    Damn :(
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  5. AlienIsGOD

    AlienIsGOD

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,443 (1.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,491

    Agreed. Im sure the binning process is much better now, so fewer defective cores are being found, resulting in higher yeilds of full X6's.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  6. Baum

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Messages:
    474 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    39
    Location:
    Germany,Hannover
    omg now they got the news on unlocking no more cheap quadcores :laugh:

    learn it keep your mouth shut with mods :D
     
  7. claylomax

    claylomax

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,602 (0.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    259
    Location:
    London
  8. lucasweir

    lucasweir

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,247 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    70
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    Exactly there plan i was thinking they want to make money off there flagship chip and then release some lower end chips they have left over from the "6 core" bin that didnt make the cut.
     
  9. suraswami

    suraswami

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    6,163 (1.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    822
    Location:
    Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
    Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo:cry:
     
  10. naoan New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    304 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    62
    Well I kinda understand their decision, with 1035T coming out it's kinda hard to position 960T, I'm still disappointed though.
     
  11. Gjohnst4

    Gjohnst4 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    223 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Batavia IL
    Damn, guess Ill have to buy the real thing now.....exactly what AMD wants me to do, I hate being manipulated ha
     
  12. lucasweir

    lucasweir

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,247 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    70
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    ha ya i felt the same way but hey everyone needs money
     
  13. Kitkat New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    768 (0.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    77
    95w 955 will be the next quad star. and if they cansel that then it means they finaly got 965 to 95w.
     
  14. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    Shitty guess people have to actually by a 6 cores now i figure that unlockable quads will just be out later on in the life cycle sounds like they have gotten very strong sales on the x6 chips which killed the sales of the 955/965be which means they have stacked a few to many quads up to make another strong seller profitable for the old stock. Let the 45nm c3 chips eol and you will have your zosma release.
     
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
  15. Pyarn

    Pyarn New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Messages:
    37 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    Cardiff
    Hmm,there goes away my dream of hexa core unlocking..
    Looks like I'll just stick with my trustworthy PII 965..
     
  16. naoan New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    304 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    62
    Or not really
    http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/18809/1/

    Granted it's fudzilla but so far I haven't seen their insider article to be false, don't hold your breath though.
     
  17. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    That's what I took out of this. For as little as the 1055 costs, it was pointless to release a high end quad in the same general price bracket.
     
  18. vagxtr

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    180 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Extremeley bad news that they canceled quad core Zosma core but unfortunately not unexpected from amd.

    Most of that engineerenig samples that are floating around could be unlocked to hexacore so it's economicly wise decision cause they would cut their own sales with high demand for 960T model


    When and if 960T will finally be available probably 6core unlock success stories would be in 20-25% margins and with extra high voltages. Most of hexacore chips (based on D0) easily run at 3.2GHz just at 1.200V (at least Opterons ;) )

    :thumbdown: AMD :thumbdown:
     
  19. vagxtr

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    180 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5

    Eeeerm dont count on such low count of damages .... It's 300+mm2 chip fgs even considerably smaller C3 had many rejects.

    It's just strategically wise decision. Big thub down for AMD that they even lure us into thinking they'll schedule Zosma (crippled X6 core) release at the same day as original Thubans. And there's always extra time needed for binninq and requalification of damaged ?lower value? chips. It wouldnt be much of surprise if they release even X2/X3 on Thuban cores after Bulldozer is introduced ;) Thank you but no thanks amd
     
  20. kenkickr

    kenkickr

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2007
    Messages:
    4,822 (1.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,444
    Are you trolling or just anti-amd because they didn't release a $150 dollar quad that could be turned into a $200 x6!?

    I agree with the decision by AMD. Absolutely pointless to release a NEW quad when the x4 965 is already so close to the x6 1055T in price, general everyday performance, and if they are having good yield turnouts on the x6 die.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  21. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,668 (13.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,064
    Keep the conversation civil please. No one needs to make their points in this news post more than once. By the way, there are other reports claiming that AMD will indeed be releasing these processors. Time will tell.
     
  22. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,797 (3.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    546
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    Well guess it is wait and see. I was eager to get an X4 and unlock it to an X6, instead of going 300 for the X6 BE. Will have to wait.
     
  23. Baam New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    Messages:
    93 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Location:
    Trucker..so all over
    I hope they release 960T even if can only get 4 cores, might be worth it over a 965 just for the turbo, especially if your not an overclocker.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page