1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Could Place x86 and ARM Cores on the Same Silicon: Report

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Oct 24, 2012.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,855 (11.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,714
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Following last week's 15% workforce cut that came with the company's Q3 2012 results, AMD plans to consolidate its workforce and eliminate "bureaucracy." According to a VR-Zone report, the company plans to announce its future strategy next week, on October 29. This strategy could ride heavily on recent moves the company made in the area of "heterogeneous computing," and a working alliance it built with the likes of ARM, MediaTek, Qualcomm, Samsung and TI, under the heterogeneous system alliance (HSA).

    According to the report, AMD's future looks to be heading towards building highly versatile SoCs for devices in the post-PC era. It's not far-fetched to imagine, for example, that AMD could integrate ARM IP onto APUs with x86 cores, with the ARM cores based on recent micro-architectures such as Cortex-M5, performing specific kinds of tasks (such as data-encryption). Down the line, AMD could also integrate baseband components into the APU, beating Intel to the punch on similar efforts.

    [​IMG]

    Source: VR-Zone
     
    Ikaruga says thanks.
  2. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,855 (11.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,714
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Maybe they should start with a RISC core dedicated to calculating Pi. AMD's market-share will shoot up in no time. :rolleyes:
     
  3. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,432 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,253
    I f they just created a app for trans coding applications into OpenCL on all those beautiful unused cores.........
     
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  4. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,098 (4.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,280
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    I'm sure they'll do that...as soon as nVidia makes CUDA/Phys-X work on CPUs properly. :p
     
  5. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    15,008 (3.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,877
    won't do much good. gpus/opencl are really really bad at branching (if .. then .. else ..)
     
    NHKS says thanks.
  6. suraswami

    suraswami

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    6,251 (1.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    837
    Location:
    Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
    AMD always thinks ahead of time and dreams for it too, but the problem is do they release the product ahead of time? And if they do, is it the way it should be?

    Hopefully PC industry don't die with all these stupid hand held devices (they are nice, but gaming on PC is better).
     
  7. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,413 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    572
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    could end up as something very usefull to amd to counter intels ssmall business advantage in chips ie an arm core as a hypervisor checking for viria in the background completely unobtrucively on thin clients (apus) or for low power advantages ,could be a good move reversed too, with a low tpd chip with an arm core for main use and a steamy core to push heavy loads on a handheld ,all tied to world leading gfx ip mmm
     
    More than 25k PPD
  8. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,432 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,253
    What can we do to fix them? :laugh:

    I'm not certain but I believe Super PI isn't really too heavily branching. However single threaded as it is you would tend to think that a CPU core running at 4Ghz would be faster at processing division than it is. Unless of course you have cache issues still.
     
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  9. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    7,756 (2.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,481
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    Yes, hearing "Post PC era" makes me sadfaced :ohwell:
     
    suraswami and jmcslob say thanks.
  10. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,643 (3.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,831
    This arm thing might have some merit even if I don't see it. Why do I feel like I am going to hear something even more rediculous like amd making an amd nvidea hybrid gpu...
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  11. Cortex

    Cortex New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    44 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    3

    Three types of processors on single chip GCN/ARM/x86 Faildozer. Why?







    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    Which company makes the iPhone?

    Is that a trick question?
    Apple or Foxconn?:rolleyes:
     
  12. Xzibit

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,125 (1.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    254
    This was hinted at way back when AMD bought SeaMicro at the start of the year and has been making the rounds when talking about ARM servers.

    Applied Micro which is leading the ARM server charge

    This could be a good medium. Having both bases covered while the industry decides which or if it moves or stays with one or the other.
     
  13. Ikaruga

    Ikaruga

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    871 (0.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    183
    I don't want to argue with you about this since I'm not a CUDA developer, but why is it that tech documents what I read from Nvidia used to state that this is incorrect. They say that you just have to code your stuff differently and the performance loss will be minimal. There is a huge body of research going on to "cure" branching and branch divergence problems, it's not like how it was at the beginning.

    Is that nothing but meaningless PR talk to programmers?
     
  14. Assimilator

    Assimilator

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    623 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    105
    Location:
    South Africa
    Eliminate bureaucracy? They'd have to fire some of their CxOs to do that, not engineers.

    As for ARM, I'm really not seeing how this partnership is going to help AMD. AMD is so heavily invested in x86, does it really have the capability/time to become skilled at producing good ARM chips as well? If this is an attempt for AMD to compete with the upcoming Intel Clovertrail (Atom CPUs for tablets) and Haswell, I'm not sure what benefit there is in having heterogeneous instruction sets in a single CPU package.
     
  15. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,643 (3.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,831
    I got it. Amd will then be able to say it runs Android apps natively.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  16. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    15,008 (3.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,877
    http://www.gamedev.net/topic/413859-need-explanation-of-efficiency-issues-with-dynamic-branching/
    post 2 and 6 in that thread have good explanations on why gpus suck at branching

    wikipedia "branch prediction" should have some good info on the complexities and what cpu makers have been doing to improve it
     
    Ikaruga and Vinska say thanks.
  17. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,202 (5.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,985
    Location:
    Home
    So Intel is forcing x86 down, while AMD is sidestepping the problem. This is going to be interesting, especially when Intel has the firepower to change route while AMD is do or die.
     
  18. Ikaruga

    Ikaruga

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    871 (0.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    183
    Thanks for the link, it was interesting to read, but it's from 2006, and a lot of progress could have been made in the last 6 years. I'm not saying that it's any close CPU solutions, but iirc it's not that hopeless anymore. I will try to dig up some docs tomorrow, and get back to you on this one.
     
  19. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    7,756 (2.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,481
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    I think it's more hedging than sidestepping... though there's a lot more to the story. Since most mobile solutions have sub-chips that perform discreet tasks that have specific host protocols already built in, they are looking to take off-the shelf parts and create a hybrid, or it certainly sounds like it.
     
  20. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,202 (5.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,985
    Location:
    Home
    Hedging is probably a better word, but either way silicon real estate is not cheap.
     
  21. suraswami

    suraswami

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    6,251 (1.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    837
    Location:
    Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
    Don't worry, Intel will be forced to follow AMD's innovation (if not already). AMD innovates and Intel follows :rockout:
     
  22. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,413 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    572
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    they are not hedgeing in anyway, the whole starting point and ethos of their current Ic design plan is modularity and pop in Ip ,they have made all of their chips this way over the last few years, an evolution on one core is then easily transfered to other asic's, and differentiated Ip can be added into there chip designs with minimal fuss, Pop in Ip is instrumental to there push in the embedded segment ;) an area Amd wish to gain further revinue from and i suspect its there Pop in Ip flexability that added weight to the next gen console decisions.
     
    More than 25k PPD
  23. horizon2600

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Messages:
    163 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    The lobotomized machine gun. Although excusable if you are 9 or 10 years old xD

    Still sig worthy.
     
  24. turtile New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Messages:
    29 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    AMD is using the ARM core for ARM's TrustZone security. It was announced months ago...

    Intel bought out McAfee to develop its own solution.
     
  25. Thefumigator

    Thefumigator

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2008
    Messages:
    417 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    66
    There will always be PC, it will never die.
    Its just about adding extensions to it.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page